Analyzing module commonality for platform design in functional and physical domain

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages 383-391

  Hölttä Otto, Katja ^a  

^a AALTO UNIVERSITY   (Finland)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; COST EFFECTIVENESS; PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; SENSORS;

DECISION TOOL; DENDROGRAM; MICRO MACHINES; MODULAR PLATFORM DESIGN;

PRODUCT DESIGN;

EID: 33244480375     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-84801     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Sanderson, S. & Uzumeri, M., 1995, "Managing product families: the case of Sony Walkman", Research Policy, 24, pp. 761-782.
2. Rendell, J., 2001. "VW top, but others are catching up fast", Automotive world, pp. 26-34, September.
3. Baldwin, C. Y. & Clark, K. B., 2000, Design Rules: The Power of Modularity Design, MIT Press, pp.471.
4. O'Grady P., 1999, The age of modularity, Adams and Steele.
5. Ulrich K. & Tung K., 1991, "Fundamentals of Product Modularity", Proc., ASME Winter Annual Meeting Symposium on Design and Manufacturing Integration, pp. 73-79, Atlanta, GA.
6. McGrath, M. E., Anthony, M. T., & Shapiro, A. R, 1992, Product development: success through product and cycle time excellence, Butteworth-Heinemann.
7. Ericsson, A. & Erixon, G, 1999, Controlling design variants: Modular product platforms, ASME press, New York, NY, pp. 145.
8. Ulrich, K. T. & Eppinger, S. D., 2004, Product Design and Development, McGraw-Hill., 3rd edition.
9. Meyer, M. H. & Lehnerd, A. P., 2000, The power of product platforms, The Free Press, New York, NY.
10. Johnson, K. W., Langdon, P.M., & Ashby, M. F., 2002, "Grouping materials and processes for the designer: an application of cluster analysis", Materials Design, 23, pp. 1-10.
11. Pedersen, K., 1999, "Designing platform families: an evolutionary approach to developing engineering systems", Doctoral Thesis, GWW School of Mechanical Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology.
12. Stake, R. B., 2000, "On conceptual development of modular products", Doctoral Thesis, Division of Assembly Systems, Dept. of Production Engineering, Royal Institute of Technology, Stockholm.
13. Jiao, J. & Tseng, M. M., 2000, "Understanding product family for mass customization by developing commonality indices", Journal of Engineering Design, 11, 3, pp. 225-243.
14. Thevenot, H. J. & Simpson, T. W., 2004, "A comparison of commonality indices for product family design", Proc., ASME Design Engineering Technical Conferences, Salt Lake City, UT, September 28- October 2.
15. Fellini, R. Kokkolaras, M., & Papalambros, P. Y., 2003, "A rigorous framework for making commonality and modularity decisions in optimal design of product families", Proc., International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, August 19-21.
16. McAdams, D. A & Wood, K. L., 2002, "A Quantitative Similarity Metric for Design-by-Analogy", ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 124, pp 173-182.
17. Hirtz, J., Stone, R. B., & McAdams, D. A., 2002, "A functional basis for engineering design: Reconciling and evolving previous efforts", Research in Engineering Design, 12, pp. 65-82.
18. Otto, K. & Wood K., 2001, Product Design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ.
19. Antonsson, E. K. & Otto, K. N., 1995, "Imprecision in Engineering Design", ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 117(B).
20. Hölttä K., Tang V., & Seering W., 2003, "Modularizing Product Architectures Using Dendrograms", Proc., International Conference on Engineering Design, Stockholm, August 19-21.