Differentiation between serological responses to Brucella suis and Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9 after natural or experimental infection in pigs

Epidemiology and Infection

Volumn 134, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 347-357

  Jungersen, G ^a   Sorensen V ^a   Giese, S B ^a   Stack, J A ^b   Riber, U ^a  

^a TECHNICAL UNIVERSITY OF DENMARK   (Denmark)

^b VETERINARY LABORATORIES AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

O ANTIGEN;

AGGLUTINATION TEST; ANIMAL DISEASE; ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ARTICLE; BACTERIAL STRAIN; BLOOD SAMPLING; BRUCELLA SUIS; BRUCELLOSIS; COMPLEMENT FIXATION TEST; CONTROLLED STUDY; CROSS REACTION; ENZYME LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; EXPERIMENTAL INFECTION; FALSE POSITIVE RESULT; FLUORESCENCE POLARIZATION IMMUNOASSAY; NONHUMAN; SEROLOGY; SEROTYPE; YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA; YERSINIOSIS;

ANIMALS; BRUCELLA SUIS; BRUCELLOSIS; DIAGNOSIS, DIFFERENTIAL; ENZYME-LINKED IMMUNOSORBENT ASSAY; FALSE POSITIVE REACTIONS; SEROLOGIC TESTS; SWINE; SWINE DISEASES; YERSINIA ENTEROCOLITICA; YERSINIA INFECTIONS;

EID: 33244477666     PISSN: 09502688     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S095026880500511X     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Caroff M, Bundle DR, Perry MB. Structure of the O-chain of the phenol-phase soluble cellular lipopolysaccharide of Yersinia enterocolitica serotype O:9. Eur J Biochem 1984; 139: 195-200.
2. Bundle DR, Cherwonogrodzky JW, Gidney MA, Meikle PJ, Perry MB, Peters T. Definition of Brucella A and M epitopes by monoclonal typing reagents and synthetic oligosaccharides. Infect Immun 1989; 57: 2829-2836.
3. Weynants V, Gilson D, Cloeckaert A, et al. Characterization of smooth lipopolysaccharides and O polysaccharides of Brucella species by competition binding assays with monoclonal antibodies. Infect Immun 1997; 65: 1939-1943.
4. Kittelberger R, Bundesen PG, Cloeckaert A, Greiser-Wilke I, Letesson JJ. Serological cross-reactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9: IV. Evaluation of the M- and C-epitope antibody response for the specific detection of B. abortus infections. Vet Microbiol 1998; 60: 45-57.
5. Kittelberger R, Hilbink F, Hansen MF, et al. Serological crossreactivity between Brucella abortus and Yersinia enterocolitica O:9 I immunoblot analysis of the antibody response to Brucella protein antigens in bovine brucellosis. Vet Microbiol 1995; 47: 257-270.
6. Spencer SA, Broughton ES, Hamid S, Young DB. Immunoblot studies in the differential diagnosis of porcine brucellosis: An immunodominant 62 kDa protein is related to the mycobacterial 65 kDa heat shock protein (HSP-65). Vet Microbiol 1994; 39: 47-60.
7. Erdenebaatar J, Bayarsaikhan B, Watarai M, Makino SI, Shirahata T. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay to differentiate the antibody responses of animals infected with Brucella species from those of animals infected with Yersinia Enterocolitica O9. Clin Diagn Lab Immunol 2003; 10: 710.
8. Mertens P, Walgraffe D, Laurent T, Deschrevel N, Letesson J-J, De Bolle X. Selection of phase-displayed peptides recognised by monoclonal antibodies directed against the lipopolysaccharide of Brucella. Inter Rev Immunol 2001; 20: 181-99.
9. Godfroid J, Saegerman C, Wellemans V, et al. How to substantiate eradication of bovine brucellosis when aspecific serological reactions occur in the course of brucellosis testing. Vet Microbiol 2002; 90: 461-77.
10. Weynants V, Godfroid J, Limbourg B, Saegerman C, Letesson JJ. Specific bovine brucellosis diagnosis based on in vitro antigen-specific gamma interferon production. J Clin Microbiol 1995; 33: 706-712.
11. Godfroid J. Brucellosis in wildlife. Rev Sci Tech 2002; 21: 277-286.
12. Baily GG, Krahn JB, Drasar BS, Stoker NG. Detection of Brucella melitensis and Brucella abortus by DNA amplification. J Trop Med Hyg 1992; 95: 271-275.
13. MacMillan AP, Starck J. Manual of standards for diagnostic tests and vaccines, 4th edn., Chapters 2.3.1 and 2.6.3. Paris: OIE, 2000.
14. Brinley Morgan WJ, MacKinnon DJ, Gill KPW, Gower SGM, Norris PIW. Brucellosis diagnosis - standard laboratory techniques, 2nd edn. Alnwick: MAFF Publications, 1978.
15. Greiser-Wilke I, Moennig V. Monoclonal antibodies and characterization of epitopes of smooth Brucella lipopolysaccharides. Ann Inst Pasteur Microbiol 1987; 138: 549-560.
16. McGiven JA, Tucker JD, Perrett LL, Stack JA, Brew SD, MacMillan AP. Validation of FPA and CELISA for the detection of antibodies to Brucella abortus in cattle sera and comparison to SAT, CFT, and IELISA. J Immunol Methods 2003; 278: 171-178.
17. Westphal O, Lüderitz O, Bister F. Concerning extraction from bacteria ith phenol/water [in German]. Z Naturforsch Teil B 1952; 76: 148-155.
18. Hassan JO, Barrow PA, Mockett AP, Mcleod S. Antibody response to experimental Salmonella Typhimurium infection in chickens measured by ELISA. Vet Rec 1990; 126: 519-522.
19. Wingstrand A, Nielsen B. Cross-sectional investigation of pig herds for Yersinia enterocolitica O:3. Proceedings of the 14th IPVS Congress, Bologna, Italy 1996.
20. European Community Council Directive. 1990; 90/429/EEC.