Ensemble of linear models for predicting drug properties

Journal of Chemical Information and Modeling

Volumn 46, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 416-423

  Arodź, Tomasz ^a   Yuen, David A ^b   Dudek, Arkadiusz Z ^c  

^a AGH UNIVERSITY OF SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY   (Poland)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^c UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA MEDICAL SCHOOL   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ALGORITHMS; EIGENVALUES AND EIGENFUNCTIONS; LINEAR ALGEBRA; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; MATRIX ALGEBRA; SET THEORY; VECTORS;

CHEMOINFORMATICS; DRUG PROPERTIES; LINEAR DISCRIMINANT ANALYSIS (LDA); LINEAR MODELS;

DRUG PRODUCTS;

DRUG; GLYCOPROTEIN P;

ACTIVE TRANSPORT; ALGORITHM; ARTICLE; CHEMICAL MODEL; CHEMISTRY; COMPUTER SIMULATION; ENZYME SPECIFICITY; HUMAN; METABOLISM; STATISTICAL MODEL; STRUCTURE ACTIVITY RELATION;

ALGORITHMS; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT, ACTIVE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; HUMANS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, CHEMICAL; P-GLYCOPROTEIN; PHARMACEUTICAL PREPARATIONS; STRUCTURE-ACTIVITY RELATIONSHIP; SUBSTRATE SPECIFICITY;

EID: 33244476755     PISSN: 15499596     EISSN: 1549960X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1021/ci050375+     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (47)

1. Gershell, L. J.; Atkins, J. H. A brief history of novel drug discovery technologies. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 321-327.
2. Jorgensen, W. L. The many roles of computation in drug discovery. Science 2004, 303, 1813-1818.
3. Debnath, A. K. Quantitative Structure-Activity Relationship (QSAR) paradigm - Hansch era to new millennium. Mini Rev. Med. Chem. 2001, 1, 187-195.
4. Ekins, S.; Rose, J. In silico ADMF/Tox: the state of the art. J. Mol. Graphics Modell. 2002, 20, 305-309.
5. van de Waterbeemd, H.; Gifford, E. ADMET in silico modelling: towards prediction paradise? Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 192-204.
6. Klopman, G.; Shi, L. M.; Ramu, A. Quantitative structure-activity relationship of multidrug resistance reversal agents. Mol. Pharmacol. 1997, 52, 323-334.
7. Bleicher, K. H.; Bohm, H.-J.; Muller, K.; Alanine, A. I. Hit and lead generation: Beyond high-throughput screening. Nat. Rev. Drug Discovery 2003, 2, 369-378.
8. Farkas, O.; Heberger, K. Comparison of ridge regression, partial least-squares, pairwise correlation, forward- and best subset selection methods for prediction of retention indices for aliphatic alcohols. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 339-346.
9. Galvez, J.; Garcia-Domenech, R.: de Julian-Ortiz, J.; Soler, R. Topological approach to drug design. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1995, 35, 272-284.
10. Murcia-Soler, M.; Perez-Gimenez, F.; Garcia-March, F. J.; Salabert-Salvador, M. T.; Diaz-Villanueva, W.; Castro-Bleda, M. J.; Villanueva-Pareja, A. Artificial neural networks and linear discriminant analysis: A valuable combination in the selection of new antibacterial compounds. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1031-1041.
11. Wold, S.; Sjostrom, M.; Eriksson, L. PLS-regression: a basic tool of chemometrics. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2001, 58, 109-130.
12. Burbidge, R.; Trotter, M.; Buxton, B. F.; Holden, S. B. Drug design by machine learning: Support Vector Machines for pharmaceutical data analysis. Comput. Chem. 2001, 26, 5-14.
13. Svetnik, V.; Liaw, A.; Tong, C.; Culberson, C.; Sheridan, R. P.; Feuston, B. P. Using general regression and probabilistic neural networks to predict human intestinal absorption with topological descriptors derived from two-dimensional chemical structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 1947-1958.
14. Guha, R.; Jurs, P. C. Development of linear, ensemble, and nonlinear models for the prediction and interpretation of the biological activity of a set of PDGFR inhibitors. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2179-2189.
15. Svetnik, V.; Wang, T.; Tong, C.; Liaw, A.; Sheridan, R. P.; Song, Q. Boosting: An ensemble learning tool for compound classification and QSAR modeling. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 786-799.
16. Merkwirth, C.; Mauser, H.; Schulz-Gasch, T.; Roche, O.; Stahl, M.; Lengauer, T. Ensemble methods for classification in cheminformatics. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 2179-2189.
17. He, P.; Xu, C.-J.; Liang, Y.-Z.; Fang, K.-T. Improving the classification accuracy in chemistry via boosting technique. Chemom. Intell. Lab. Syst. 2004, 70, 39-46.
18. Agrafiotis, D. K.; Cedeno, W.; Lobanov, V. S. On the use of neural network ensembles in QSAR and QSPR. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2002, 42, 903-911.
19. Freund, Y.; Schapire, R. A decision-theoretic generalization of online learning and an application to boosting. J. Comput. Syst. Sci. 1997, 55, 119-139.
20. Skurichina, M.; Duin, R. P. W. Boosting in linear discriminant analysis. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2000, 1857, 190-199.
21. Skurichina, M.; Duin, R. P. W. Bagging, boosting and the random subspace method for linear classifiers. Pattern Anal. Appl. 2002, 5, 121-135.
22. Freund, Y.; Schapire, R. A short introduction to boosting. J. Jpn. Soc. Artif. Intell. 1999, 14, 771-780.
23. Meir, R.; Rätsch, G. An introduction to boosting and leveraging. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2003, 2600, 118-183.
24. Ho, T. K. The random subspace method for constructing decision forests. IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 1998, 20, 832-844.
25. Breiman, L. Bagging predictors. Mach. Learn. 1996, 24, 123-140.
26. Kuncheva, L. That elusive diversity in classifier ensembles. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. 2003, 2652, 1126-1138.
27. Arodź, T. Boosting the Fisher Linear Discriminant with random feature subsets. In Computer Recognition Systems, Advances in Soft Computing; Springer: Berlin, Heidelberg, 2005.
28. Kuncheva, L. I.; Whitaker, C. J. Measures of diversity in classifier ensembles and their relationship with the ensemble accuracy. Mach. Learn. 2003, 51, 181-207.
29. Brown, G.; Wyatt, J.; Harris, R.; Yao, X. Diversity creation methods: A survey and categorisation. Inf. Fusion 2005, 6, 5-20.
30. Schapire, R. E.; Freund, Y.; Bartlett, P.; Lee, W. S. Boosting the margin: a new explanation for the effectiveness of voting methods. Ann. Stat. 1998, 26, 1651-1686.
31. Vapnik, V. Estimation of Dependences Based on Empirical Data: Springer Series in Statistics; Springer: New York, 1982.
32. Wessel, M. D.; Jurs, P. C.; Tolan, J. W.; Muskal, S. M. Prediction of human intestinal absorption of drug compounds from molecular structure. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 1998, 38, 726-735.
33. Xue, Y.; Li, Z. R.; Yap, C. W.; Sun, L. Z.; Chen, X.; Chen, Y. Z. Effect of molecular descriptor feature selection in support vector machine classification of pharmacokinetic and toxicological properties of chemical agents. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 1630-1638.
34. Seelig, A. A general pattern for substrate recognition by P-glycoprotein. Eur. J. Biochem. 1998, 251, 252-261.
35. Layton, D.; Key, C.; Shakir, S. A. Prolongation of the QT interval and cardiac arrhythmias associated with cisapride: limitations of the pharmacoepidemiological studies conducted and proposals for the future. Pharmacoepidemiol. Drug Saf. 2003, 12, 31-40.
36. Keating, M. T. The long QT syndrome: A review of recent molecular genetic and physiologic discoveries. Medicine 1996, 75, 1-5.
37. Saucerman, J. J.; Healy, S. N.; Belik, M. E.; Puglisi, J. L.; McCulloch, A. D. Proarrhythmic consequences of a KCNQ1 AKAP-binding domain mutation. Computational models of whole cells and heterogeneous tissue. Circ. Res. 2004, 95, 1216-1224.
38. Ponti, F. D.; Poluzzi, E.; Cavalli, A.; Recanatini, M.; Montanaro, N. Safety of nonantiarrhythmic drugs that prolong the QT interval or induce torsade de pointes: an overview. Drug Safety 2002, 25, 263-286.
39. Gottesman, M.; Pastan, I. Biochemistry of multidrug resistance mediated by the multidrug transporter. Annu. Rev. Biochem. 1993, 62, 385-427.
40. Bakken, G. A.; Jurs, P. C. Classification of multidrug-resistance reversal agents using structure-based descriptors and linear discriminant analysis J. Med. Chem. 2000, 43, 4534-4541.
41. Weston, J.; Perez-Cruz, F.; Bousquet, O.; Chapelle, O.; Elisseeff, A.; Scholkopf, B. Feature selection and transduction for prediction of molecular bioactivity for drug design. Bioinformatics 2003, 19, 764-771.
42. Müller, K.-R.; Rätsch, G.; Sonnenburg, S.; Mika, S.; Grimm, M.; Heinrich, N. Classifying "drug-likeness" with kernel-based learning methods. J. Chem. Inf. Model. 2005, 45, 249-253.
43. Galvez, J.; Garcia-Domenech, R.; de Gregorio Alapont, C.; de Julian-Ortiz, J.; Popa, L. Pharmacological distribution diagrams: a tool for de novo drug design. J. Mol. Graphics 1996, 14, 272-276.
44. Golland, P.; Liang, F.; Mukherjee, S.; Panchenko, D. Permutation tests for classification. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. 2005, 3559, 501-515.
45. Niwa, T. Using general regression and probabilistic neural networks to predict human intestinal absorption with topological descriptors derived from two-dimensional chemical structures. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2003, 43, 113-119.
46. Penzotti, J. E.; Lamb, M. L.; Evensen, E.; Grootenhuis, P. D. J. A computational ensemble pharmacophore model for identifying sub-strates of P-Glycoprotein. J. Med. Chem. 2002, 45, 1737-1740.
47. Mazzatorta, P.; Benfenati, E.; Lorenzini, P.; Vighi, M. QSAR in ecotoxicity - an overview of modern classification techniques. J. Chem. Inf. Comput. Sci. 2004, 44, 105-112.