What frege meant when he said: Kant is right about geometry

Philosophia Mathematica

Volumn 14, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 44-75

  Merrick, Teri ^a  

^a AZUSA PACIFIC UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33244473489     PISSN: 00318019     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1093/philmat/nkj013     Document Type: Article

References (44)

1. Anderson, L. [2005]: 'Neo-Kantianism and the roots of anti-psychologism', British Journal for the History of Philosophy 13, 287-323.
2. Beaney, M., ed. [1997]: 'Introduction', in The Frege Reader. Oxford: Blackwell, pp. 1-46.
3. Burge, T. [2001]: 'Frege on apriority', in [Newen et al., 2001], pp. 53-87
4. Carl, W. [2001]: 'Frege: A Platonist or neo-Kantian?', in [Newen et al., 2001], pp. 3-18.
5. Cassirer, E. [1953] (1910 and 1921): Substance and Function and Einstein's Theory of Relativity. W. C. Swabey and M. C. Swabey, trans. New York: Dover Publications.
6. Coffa, A. [1991]: The Semantic Tradition from Kant to Carnap. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
7. Cohen, H. [1871]: Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. 1st ed. Berlin: F. Dummler.
8. Cohen, H. [1876]: 'Introduction', in Friedrich Lange, Geschichte des Materialismus. Leipzig: Baedeker (1902).
9. Cohen, H. [1883]: Das Princip der Infinitesimal-Methode und seine Geschichte. Berlin: F. Dummler.
10. Cohen, H. [1885]: Kants Theorie der Erfahrung. 2nd ed. Berlin: Dummler.
11. Ewald, W., ed. [1996]: From Kant to Hilbert: A Source Book in the Foundations of Mathematics. Vol. II. Oxford: Clarendon Press.
12. Frege, G. [1970] (1879): 'Begriffsschrift' in [van Heijenoort, 1970], pp. 1-82.
13. Frege, G. [1980] (1884): The Foundations of Arithmetic. J. L. Austin, trans. Evanston: Northwestern University Press.
14. Frege, G. [1971]: On the Foundations of Geometry and Formal Theories of Arithmetic. E. Kluge, ed. and trans. New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. Frege, G. [1979]: Posthumous Writings. H. Hermes, F. Kambartal, and F. Kaulbach, eds. P. Long and R. White, trans. Oxford: Basil Blackwell.
16. Friedman, M. [1997]: 'Helmholtz's Zeichentheorie and Schlick's Allgemeine Erkenntnislehre: Early logical empiricism and its nineteenth-century background,' Philosophical Topics 25, 19-50.
17. Friedman, M. [2000a]: A Parting of the Ways. Chicago: Open Court.
18. Friedman, M. [2000b]: 'Geometry, construction, and intuition in Kant and his successors', in G. Sher and R. Tieszen, eds., Between Logic and Intuition. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, pp. 186-218.
19. Hankel, H. [1875]: Die Elemente der Projectivischen Geometrie in Synthetischer Behandlung. Leipzig: L. Voss.
20. Hatfield G. [1990]: The Natural and the Normative. Cambridge, Mass.: MIT Press.
21. Helmholtz, H. [1868]: 'Recent progress in the theory of vision', reprinted in [Helmholtz, 1971], pp. 145-222.
22. Helmholtz, H. [1894]: 'The origin and correct interpretation of our sense impressions', in [Helmholtz, 1971], pp. 501-512.
23. Helmholtz, H. [1971]: Selected Writings of Hermann von Helholtz. R. Kahl, trans. Middletown, Conn.: Wesleyan University Press.
24. Helmholtz, H. [1977] (1876): 'On the Origin and Significance of the Axioms of Geometry' reprinted in R. Cohen and Y. Elkana, eds, Hermann von Helmholtz: Epistemological Writings, pp. 1-38. M. Lowe, trans. Dordrecht: D. Reidel.
25. Helmholtz, H. [1996a] (1878): 'Origin and meaning of geometrical axioms', reprinted in [Ewald, 1996], pp. 685-689.
26. Helmholtz, H. [1996b] (1878): 'The Facts in Perception,' reprinted in [Ewald, 1996], pp. 689-727.
27. Kant, I. [1965] (1781/1787): Critique of Pure Reason. Norman Kemp Smith, trans. New York: St. Martin's Press.
28. Kluback, W. [1987]: The Idea of Humanity. Lanham, Maryland: University Press of America.
29. Kohnke, K. [1991] (1986): The rise of neo-Kantianism: German academic philosophy between idealism and positivism. R. J. Hollingdale, trans. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
30. Kolb, D. [1981]: 'Editor's Introduction to Natorp [1981]', Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 12, 245-246.
31. Kuhn, T. [1970]: Structure of Scientific Revolutions. 2nd ed. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
32. Merrick, T. [2004]: Frege's Distinction between Concepts and Objects: A descendant of Kant's Distinction between Concepts and Intuitions. Ph.D. dissertation, University of California, Irvine.
33. Natorp, P. [1981] (1887): 'On the objective and subjective grounding of knowledge', L. Phillip and D. Kolb, trans., Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 12, 245-266.
34. Newen, A., U. Normann, and R. Stuhlmann-Laaeisz, eds. [2001]: Building on Frege. Stanford: CSLI Publications.
35. Patton, L. [2004]: Hermann Cohen's History and Philosophy of Science. Ph.D. dissertation, McGill University, Montreal.
36. Poma, A. [1997] (1988): The Critical Philosophy of Hermann Cohen. John Denton, trans. Albany: State University of New York Press.
37. Resnik, M. [1980] Frege and the Philosophy of Mathematics Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
38. Richardson, A. W. [2003]: 'Conceiving, experiencing, and conceiving experiencing: Neo-Kantianism and the history of the concept of experience', Topoi 22, 55-67.
39. Schirn, M. [1996a]: 'Introduction: Frege on the foundations of arithmetic and geometry', in [Schirn, 1996c], pp. 1-42.
40. Schirn, M. [1996b]: 'On Frege's introduction of cardinal objects as logical objects', in [Schirn, 1996c], pp. 114-173.
41. Schirn, M. ed. [1996c]: Frege: Importance and Legacy. New York: Walter de Gruyter.
42. Tappenden, J. [1995]: 'Geometry and generality in Frege's philosophy of arithmetic', Synthese 102, 319-361.
43. van Heijenoort, J., ed. [1970]: Frege and Gödel: Two Fundamental Texts in Mathematical Logic. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press.
44. Wilson, M. [1997] (1992): 'Frege: The royal road from geometry', reprinted in W. Demopoulos, ed., Frege's Philosophy of Mathematics. Cambridge, Massachusetts: Harvard University Press, pp. 108-159.