Isolation and characterization of microsatellite loci from the Australasian sea snake, Aipysurus laevis

Molecular Ecology Notes

Volumn 5, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 879-881

  Lukoschek, Vimoksalehi ^a,b   Waycott, Michelle ^a   Dunshea, Glenn ^a  

^a JAMES COOK UNIVERSITY   (Australia)

^b UNIVERSITY OF AUCKLAND   (New Zealand)

Author keywords

Aipysurus laevis; Elapid; Hydrophid; Microsatellites; Sea snakes

Indexed keywords

AIPYSURUS LAEVIS; ELAPIDAE; HYDROPHIIDAE;

EID: 33244469007     PISSN: 14718278     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2005.01094.x     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Glenn TC, Cary T, Dust M et al. (2000) Microsatellite Isolation 2000. In: Biology 656 Summer Class Manual, pp. 1-28. University of South Carolina, Columbia.
2. Hamilton MB, Pincus EL, Di Fiore A, Fleisher RC (1999) Universal linker and ligation procedures for construction of genomic DNA libraries enriched for microsatellites. BioTechniques, 27, 500-507.
3. Heatwole H (1999) Sea Snakes, 2nd edn. University of New South Wales, Sydney.
4. Hoffman JI, Amos W (2005) Microsatellite genotyping errors: detection approaches, common sources and consequences for paternal exclusion. Molecular Ecology, 14, 599-612.
5. Peakall R, Smouse PE (2001) GENALEX Version 5: Genetic Analysis in Excel. Population Genetic Software for Teaching and Research. Australian National University, Canberra, Australia.
6. Raymond M, Rousset F (1995) An exact test for population differentiation. Evolution, 49, 1280-1283.
7. Sambrook J, Russell DW (2001) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, 3rd edn. Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, Cold Spring Harbor, New York.
8. Scott IAW, Hayes CM, Keogh JS, Webb JK (2001) Isolation and characterisation of novel microsatellite markers from the Australian tiger snakes (Elapidae: Notechis) and amplification in the closely related genus Hoplocephalus. Molecular Ecology Notes, 1, 117-120.
9. Sefc KM, Payne RB, Sorenson MD (2003) Microsatellite amplification from museum feather samples: effects of fragment size and template concentration on genotyping errors. Auk, 120, 982-989.