Student system level design activities: An empirical pilot study on improving design outcomes

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005

Volumn 5, Issue , 2005, Pages 19-25

  Ruder, Joshua ^a   Sobek II, Durward K ^a  

^a Idaho National Laboratory   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

STATISTICAL METHODS; STUDENTS;

DESIGN OUTCOME QUALITY; STATISTICAL TESTING; SYSTEM LEVEL DESIGN (SLD);

SYSTEMS ANALYSIS;

EID: 33244458940     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-85281     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (8)

1. Pugh Stuart, 1991, Total Design: Integrated Methods for Successful Product Engineering, Addison-Wesley, Wokingham, England.
2. Otto, K. N., & Wood, K. L., 2001, Product Design, Prentice Hall, Upper Saddle River, New Jersey.
3. Pahl, G. & Beitz, W., 1996, Engineering Design: A Systematic Approach, Springer, London.
4. Sobek II, D.K., 2002, "Preliminary Findings from Coding Student Design Journals," 2002 American Society of Engineering Education conference, Montreal, Canada
5. Jain, V. K., 2003, Relating Design Process to Design Outcomes in Engineering Capstone Projects, M.S. thesis, Montana State University, Bozeman, Montana.
6. Wilkening, Samuel, & Sobek II, D.K., 2004, "Relating Design Activity to Quality of Outcome," ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Salt Lake City, USA
7. Costa, Ramon, & Sobek II, D.K., 2004, "How Process Affects Performance," ASME 2004 Design Engineering Technical Conference, Salt Lake City, USA.
8. Carrizosa, Ken, & Sheppard, Sheri. 2000. "The Importance of Learning Styles in Group Design Work," ASEE/IEEE Frontiers in Education Conference. Kansas City, MO. USA.,