Analysis of internal drive train dynamics in a wind turbine

Wind Energy

Volumn 9, Issue 1-2, 2006, Pages 141-161

  Peeters, Joris L M ^a   Vandepitte, Dirk ^a   Sas, Paul ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF LEUVEN   (Belgium)

Author keywords

Drive train; Dynamic loads; Gearbox; Multibody system; Wind turbine

Indexed keywords

BEARINGS (MACHINE PARTS); DYNAMIC LOADS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROTATION; SPUR GEARS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL); WIND TURBINES;

DRIVE TRAINS; EIGENMODES; GEARBOX; MULTIBODY SYSTEM;

HELICAL GEARS;

BEARINGS (MACHINE PARTS); DYNAMIC LOADS; HELICAL GEARS; MATHEMATICAL MODELS; ROTATION; SPUR GEARS; VIBRATIONS (MECHANICAL); WIND TURBINES;

MECHANICS; WIND TURBINE;

EID: 33244458922     PISSN: 10954244     EISSN: 10991824     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/we.173     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (20)

1. Molenaar D-P, Dijkstra S. State of the art of wind turbine design codes: main features overview for cost-effective generation. Wind Engineering 1999; 23: 295-311.
2. Deutsches Institut für Normung. Calculation of Load Capacity of Cylindrical Gears. DIN 3990, 1987.
3. Deutsches Institut für Normung. Rolling Bearings: Dynamic Load Ratings and Rating Life. DIN ISO 281, 1990.
4. DADS Revision 9.6 Documentation. LMS International Leuven, 2000.
5. Kahraman A. Effect of axial vibrations on the dynamics of a helical gear pair. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 1993; 115: 33-39.
6. Kahraman A. Dynamic analysis of a multi-mesh helical gear train. Journal of Mechanical Design 1994; 116: 706-712.
7. Lin J, Parker RG. Analytical characterization of the unique properties of planetary gear free vibration. Journal of Vibration and Acoustics 1999; 121: 316-321.
8. Parker RG, Agashe V, Vijayakar SM. Dynamic response of a planetary gear system using a finite/contact mechanics model. Journal of Mechanical Design 1994; 122: 304-310.
9. Kahraman A. Planetary gear train dynamics. Journal of Mechanical Design 1994; 116: 713-720.
10. Peeters J, Vandepitte D, Sas P, Lammens S. Comparison of analysis techniques for the dynamic behaviour of an integrated drive train in a wind turbine. Proceedings of the International Conference on Noise & Vibration Engineering ISMA2002. Leuven, 2002; 1397-1406.
11. Peeters J, Vandepitte D, Sas P. Dynamic analysis of an integrated drive train in a wind turbine. Proceedings of the European Wind Energy Conference EWEC2003. Madrid, 2003. (CD-ROM).
12. Gold PW. DRESP 7.0 Documentation. IME-RWTH Aachen/FVA: Aachen, 1998.
13. Lin J, Parker RG. Structured vibration characteristics of planetary gears with unequally spaced planets. Journal of Sound and Vibration 2000; 233: 921-928.
14. Hurty WC, Dynamic analysis of structural systems using component modes. AIAA Journal 1965; 3: 678-685.
15. Craig Jr RR. Structural Dynamics. Wiley: New York, 1981.
16. Craig Jr RR. A review of time-domain and frequency-domain component-mode synthesis methods. International Journal of Analytical and Experimental Model Analysis 1987; 2: 59-72.
17. Craig Jr RR. Substructure methods in vibration. Journal of Mechanical Design 1994; 117: 207-213.
18. Spanos JT, Tsuha WS. Selection of component modes for flexible multibody simulation. Journal of Guidance Control and Dynamics 1991; 14: 278-286.
19. Craig Jr RR, Bampton MCC. Coupling of substructures for dynamic analyses. AIAA Journal 1968; 6: 1313-1319.
20. Baumjohann F, Hermanski M, Diekmann R, Kroning J. 3D-multi body simulation of wind turbines with flexible components. DEWI Magazin 2002; 21: 63-66.