Does a failed quit attempt reduce cigarette consumption following resumption of smoking? The effects of time and quit attempts on the longitudinal analysis of self-reported cigarette smoking intensity

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 8, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 415-423

  Knoke, James D ^a   Anderson, Christy M ^a   Burns, David M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ACADEMIC ACHIEVEMENT; ADULT; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; FEMALE; GEOGRAPHIC DISTRIBUTION; HEALTH SURVEY; HUMAN; INTERVIEW; LONGITUDINAL STUDY; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; POPULATION DISTRIBUTION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUESTIONNAIRE; RACE DIFFERENCE; SELF REPORT; SMOKING CESSATION PROGRAM; SMOKING HABIT; SOCIAL STATUS; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; TOBACCO DEPENDENCE; TREATMENT FAILURE; UNITED STATES;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BEHAVIOR, ADDICTIVE; CALIFORNIA; FEMALE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LONGITUDINAL STUDIES; MALE; QUESTIONNAIRES; REGRESSION ANALYSIS; SMOKING CESSATION; TOBACCO USE DISORDER;

EID: 33144490247     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: 1469994X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14622200600672740     Document Type: Article

References (15)

1. Benowitz, N. L. and Hall, S. and Dempsey, D. and Allen, F. and Peng, M. and Jacob, P. (2004). In Safety of a nicotine reduction strategy [pp].
2. Burns, D. M. and Anderson, C. M. and Major, J. M. and Biener, L. and Vaughn, J. and Shanks, T. J. (2000) Cessation and cessation measures among adult daily smokers: National and state-specific data. In Population based smoking cessation: Proceedings of a conference on what works to influence cessation in the general population. Bethesda MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No.12, NIH Publication No.00-4892, pp. 25-98)
3. Burns, D. M. and Major, J. M. and Shanks, T. G. and Thun, M. J. and Samet, J. M. (2001) Smoking lower yield cigarettes and disease risk. In Risks associated with smoking cigarettes with low machine-measured yields of tar and nicotine. Bethesda MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, National Institutes of Health, National Cancer Institute. (Smoking and Tobacco Control Monograph No.13, NIH Publication No.02-5074, pp.65-158)
4. Gritz, E. R. (1980) Smoking behavior and tobacco abuse. In Advances in substance abuse. Greenwich CT: JAI Press. (Vol. 1, pp. 91-158)
5. Hatsukami, D. K. and Hecht, S. (2005). In Hope or hazard? What research tells us about "potentially reduced-exposure" tobacco products. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Transdisciplinary Tobacco Use Research Center.
6. Hatsukami, D. K. and Henningfield, J. E. and Kotlyar, M. (2004) Harm reduction approaches to reducing tobacco-related mortality. Annual Review of Public Health, 25, pp. 377-395.
7. Knoke, J. D. and Anderson, C. M. and Koch, G. G. (2006) Analyzing repeated measures marginal models on sample survey data. Journal of Statistical Software, 15((8)), pp. 1-13.
8. Koch, G. G. and Landis, J. R. and Freeman, J. L. and Freeman, D. H., Jr. and Lehnen, R. C. (1977) A general methodology for the analysis of experiments with repeated measurement of categorical data. Biometrics, 33, pp. 133-158.
9. Koch, G. G. and Reinfurt, D. W. (1971) The analysis of categorical data from mixed models. Biometrics, 27, pp. 157-173.
10. Shao, J. (1996) Resampling methods in sample surveys (with discussion). Statistics, 27, pp. 203-254.
11. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1988). In The health consequences of smoking: Nicotine addiction. A report of the surgeon general. Rockville MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control, Center for Health Promotion and Education, Office on Smoking and Health. (DHHS Publication No. CDC 88-8406)
12. University of California at San Diego. 1991. California Tobacco Survey, 1990-1991. Retrieved from http://ssdc.ucsd.edu/ssdc/pub/cpc00001.html
13. University of California at San Diego. 1996. California Tobacco Survey, 1996. Retrieved from http://ssdc.ucsd.edu/ssdc/pub/cpc00004.html
14. University of California at San Diego. 1999. California Tobacco Survey, 1999. Retrieved from http://ssdc.ucsd.edu/ssdc/pub/cpc00006.html
15. Waksberg, J. (1978) Sampling methods for random digit dialing. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 73, pp. 40-46.