‘Pho’ Phai and faux phais: The market for fakes and the appropriation of a Vietnamese national symbol

Ethnos

Volumn 64, Issue 2, 1999, Pages 232-248

  Taylor, Nora A ^a  

^a ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Cultural production; Forgeries; Orientalism; Preservation; Vietnam

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144486802     PISSN: 00141844     EISSN: 1469588X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/00141844.1999.9981600     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Benjamin, Walter. 1970. “ The Work of Art in the Age of Mechanical Reproduction. ”. In Illuminations, Edited by: Arendt, Hannah. 219–226. London: J. Cape.
2. Boudarel, Georges. 1991. Cent fleurs éclosent dans la nuit du Vietnam., Paris: Jacques Bertoin.
3. Bourdieu, Pierre. 1979. La distinction: Critique sociale du jugement., Paris: Editions de Minuit.
4. Boudarel, Georges. 1992. Les règies de l'art., Paris: Éditions du Seuil.
5. Clifford, James. 1986. Writing Culture., Berkeley: University of California Press.
6. Clunas, Craig. 1992. “ Connoisseurs and Aficionados: The Real and the Fake in Ming China (1368–1644). ”. In Why Fakes Matter, Edited by: Jones, Mark. 151London: The British Museum.
7. Tuong, Duong. 1990. “ There Exists a Phaian World. ”. In Bui Xuan Phai:From the Collection of Tran Hau Tuan, Edited by: Quan, Nguyen. Hanoi: Red River Publishing House.
8. Errington, Shelley. 1998. The Death of Authentic Primitive Art and Other Tales of Progress., Berkeley: University of California Press.
9. Gopnik, Adam. 1997. Doubting Vincent. The New Yorker., July
10. Hantover, Jeffrey. 1991. Uncorked Soul., Hong Kong: Plum Blossoms.
11. Jamieson, Neil. 1995. Understanding Vietnam., Berkeley: University of California Press.
12. Jones, Mark. 1990. Fake? The Art of Deception., London: The British Museum.
13. Jamieson, Neil. 1992. Why Fakes Matter., London: The British Museum.
14. Kris, Ernst, and Kurz, Otto. 1979. Legend, Myth and Magic in the Image of the Artist, New Haven: Yale University Press.
15. MacClancy, Jeremy. 1988. A Natural Curiosity: The British Market in Primitive Art. RES., 15: 163–176.
16. Marr, David G., 1981. Vietnamese Tradition on Trial 1920–1945, Los Angeles: University of California Press.
17. Myers, Fred R., 1994. Culture-Making: Performing Aboriginality at the Asia Society Gallery. American Ethnologist, 21(4): 679–699.
18. Marr, David G. 1998. Uncertain Regard: An Exhibition of Aboriginal Art in France. Ethnos, 63(1): 7–47.
19. Quan, Nguyen, ed. 1990. Bui Xuan Phai: From the Collection of Tran Hau Tuan., Hanoi: Red River Publishing House.
20. Norindr, Panivong. 1996. Phantasmatic Indochina., Durham: Duke University Press.
21. Price, Richard, and Price, Sally. 1995. Enigma Variations., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
22. Taylor, Nora. 1994. Art Market Tainted by Forgeries. Vietnam Investment Review, April 4: 1
23. Price, Richard, and Price, Sally. 1997. The Artist and The State: The Politics of Painting and National Identity in Hanoi, Vietnam 1925–1995, Cornell University. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation
24. Taylor, Nora. 1999. “ Framing the National Spirit: Viewing and Reviewing Painting under the Revolution. ”. In The Country of Memory: Remaking the Past in Late Socialist Vietnam, Edited by: Tai, Hue-Tarn Ho. Berkeley: University of California Press.
25. Ba Van, Thai. 1994. Masters of Vietnamese Painting: To Ngoc Van, Nguyen Gia Tri, Nguyen Sang, Bui Xuan Phai., Hanoi: Fine Arts Publishing House.
26. Thomas, Nicholas. 1991. Entangled Objects: Exchange, Material Culture, and Colonialism in the Pacific., Cambridge: Harvard University Press.