Influence of the remaining coronal structure on the resistance of teeth with intraradicular retainer

Brazilian Dental Journal

Volumn 16, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 197-201

  Pereira, Jefferson Ricardo ^a,b   Neto, Tatiany De Mendonça ^a   Porto, Vinícius De Carvalho ^a   Pegoraro, Luiz Fernando ^a   Do Valle, Accácio Lins ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SÃO PAULO   (Brazil)

^b NONE   (Brazil)

Author keywords

Composite resins; Fracture strength; Posts and core technique

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144485028     PISSN: 01036440     EISSN: 01036440     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1590/s0103-64402005000300005     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Assif D, Gorfil C. Biomechanical considerations in restoring endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1994;71:565-567.
2. Cohen BI, Pagnillo M, Condos S, Deutsch AS. Comparison of torsional forces at failure for seven endodontic post systems. J Prosthet Dent 1996;74:350-357.
3. Guzy GE, Nicholls JI. In vitro comparison of intact endodontically treated teeth with and without endo-post reinforcement. J Prosthet Dent 1979;42:39-44.
4. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Ferrule design and fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:529-536.
5. Hopwood WA, Wilson NH. Clinical assessment of split-shank post system in permanent molar and pre-molar teeth. Quintessence Int 1990;21:907-911.
6. Stockton LW. Factors affecting retention of post systems: a literature review. J Prosthet Dent 1999;81:380-385.
7. Torbjorner A, Karlsson S, Odman PA. Survival rate and failure characteristics for two post designs. J Prosthet Dent 1995;73:439-444.
8. Assif D, Oren E, Marshak BE, Aviv I. Photoelastic analysis of stress transfer by endodontically treated teeth to the supporting structure using different restorative techniques. J Prosthet Dent 1989;61:676-678.
9. Fraga RC, Chaves BT, Mello GS, Siqueira JF Jr. Fracture resistance of endodontically treated roots after restoration. J Oral Rehab 1998;25:809-813.
10. Abdalla AI, Alhadainy HA. 2-year clinical evaluation of class I posterior composites. Am J Dent 1996;9:150-152.
11. Bex RT, Parker MW, Judkins JT, Pelleu GB Jr. Effect of dentinal bonded resin post-core preparations on resistance to vertical fracture. J Prosthet Dent 1992;67:768-772.
12. Bowen RE, Cobb EN. A method for bonding to dentin and enamel. J Am Dent Ass 1983;107:1070-1076.
13. Loney RW, Kotowics WE, Mcdowell GC. Three-dimension photoelastic stress analysis of the ferrule effect in cast post and cores. J Prosthet Dent 1990;63:506-546.
14. Isidor F, Brondum K, Ravnholt G. The influence of post length and crown ferrule on the resistance to cyclic loading of bovine teeth prefabricated titanium post. Int J Prosthodont 1999;12:79-82.
15. Sorensen JA. Preservation of tooth structure. Can Dent Ass J 1988;5:15-21.
16. Goodacre CJ. Five factors to be considered when restoring treated teeth. Pract Proced Aesthet Dent 2004;16:455-460.
17. Morgano SM, Rodrigues AHC, Sabrosa CE. Resoration of endodontically treated teeth. Dent Clin N Amer, 2004;48:397-416.
18. Gegauff AG. Effect of crown lengthening and ferrule placement on static load failure of cemented cast post-cores and crowns. J Prosthet Dent 2000;84:169-179.
19. Sorensen JA, Engelman MJ. Effect of post adaptation on fracture resistance of endodontically treated teeth. J Prosthet Dent 1990;64:419-424.
20. Lyons MF. A preliminary electromyographic study of bite force and jaw-closing muscle fatigue in human subjects with advanced tooth wear. J Oral Rehab 1990;17:311-318.