On the relation of connectivity and specificational pseudoclefts

Natural Language Semantics

Volumn 10, Issue 4, 2002, Pages 243-284

  Heller, Daphna ^a  

^a RUTGERS UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144481482     PISSN: 0925854X     EISSN: 1572865X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/A:1022152007523     Document Type: Article

References (41)

1. Akmajian, Andreas: 1970, 'On Deriving Cleft Sentences from Pseudocleft Sentences', Linguistic Inquiry 1, 140-168.
2. Bach, Emmon and Barbara H. Partee: 1980, 'Anaphora and Semantic Structure', in J. Kreiman and A. Ojeda (eds.), CLS Parasession on Anaphora, pp. 7-28. Chicago Linguistic Society, Chicago.
3. Berman, Ruth and Alexander Grosu: 1976, 'Aspects of the Copula in Modern Hebrew', in P. Cole (ed.), Studies in Modern Hebrew Syntax and Semantics, pp. 265-285. North Holland, Amsterdam.
4. Chierchia, Gennaro: 1984, Topics in the Syntax and Semantics of Infinitives and Gerunds, PhD dissertation, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
5. Chomsky, Noam: 1981, Lectures on Government and Binding. Foris, Dordrecht.
6. Chomsky, Noam: 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin, and Use. New York, Praeger.
7. Dahl, Östen: 1981, 'Binding Relations in Dislocated Constituents', talk presented at the Sloan Workshop on Alternatives to Transformational Grammar, Stanford University.
8. Danon, Gabi: 2001, 'The Hebrew Object Marker as a Type-shifting Operator', in E. Aim, K. Gerdes, and H. Yoo (eds.), Proceedings of the 6th Doctorate Meeting in Linguistics, pp. 41-46. Université Paris 7, Paris.
9. Doron, Edit: 1983, Verbless Predicates in Hebrew, PhD dissertation, University of Texas at Austin.
10. Dowty, David and Pauline Jacobson: 1989, 'Agreement as a Semantic Phenomenon', in J. Powers and K. de Jong (eds.), Proceedings of the Fifth Eastern States Conference on Linguistics (ESCOL '88), pp. 95-108. The Ohio State University, Columbus.
11. Engdahl, Elisabeth: 1986, Constituent Questions. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
12. Greenberg, Yael: 1994, Hebrew Nominal Sentences and the Nature of the Stage-Individual Level Distinction, MA thesis, Bar-Ilan University.
13. Greenberg, Yael: 1998, 'An Overt Syntactic Marker for Genericity in Hebrew', in S. Rothstein (ed.), Events and Grammar, pp. 125-143. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
14. Grodzinsky, Yosef and Tanya Reinhart: 1993, 'The Innateness of Binding and Coreference', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 69-101.
15. Groenendijk, Jeroen and Martin Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Academisch Proefschrift, University of Amsterdam.
16. Groos, Anneke and Henk van Riemsdijk: 1981, 'Matching Effects with Free Relatives: A Parameter of Core Grammar', in A. Belleti, L. Brandi, and L. Rizzi (eds.), Theories of Markedness in Generative Grammar, pp. 171-216. Scuola Normale Superiore di Pisa, Pisa.
17. Grosu, Alexander: 1994, Three Studies in Locality and Case. Routledge, London.
18. Heller, Daphna: 1999, The Syntax and Semantics of Specificational Pseudoclefts in Hebrew, MA thesis, Tel Aviv University.
19. Heycock, Caroline and Anthony Kroch: 1999, 'Pseudoclefts Connectivity: Implications for the LF Interface Level', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 365-397.
20. Higgins, F. Roger: 1973, The Pseudocleft Construction in English, PhD dissertation, MIT [revised version published by Garland, New York, 1979].
21. Hornstein, Norbert: 1984, Logic as Grammar. MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.
22. Iatridou, Sabine and Spyridoula Varlokosta: 1998, 'Pseudoclefts Crosslinguistically', Natural Language Semantics 6, 3-28.
23. Jacobson, Pauline: 1994, 'Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences', in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of SALT 4, pp. 161-178. Cornell University, Ithaca, N.Y.
24. Jacobson, Pauline: 1999, 'Towards a Variable-Free Semantics', Linguistics and Philosophy 22(2), 117-185.
25. Partee, Barbara H.: 1986, 'Ambiguous Pseudoclefts with Unambiguous BE', in S. Berman, J.-W. Choe, and J. McDonough (eds.), Proceeding of NELS 16, pp. 354-366. GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst.
26. Peters, Stanley and Emmon Bach: 1968, 'Pseudo-Cleft Sentences', unpublished ms., University of Texas, Austin.
27. Pollard, Carl and Ivan A. Sag: 1992, 'Anaphors in English and the Scope of the Binding Theory', Linguistic Inquiry 23, 261-303.
28. Rapoport, Tova Rebecca: 1987, Copular, Nominal and Small Clauses: A Study of Israeli Hebrew, PhD dissertation, MIT.
29. Reinhart, Tanya: 1997, 'Quantifier Scope - How Labor is Divided between QR and Choice Functions', Linguistics and Philosophy 20, 335-397.
30. Reinhart, Tanya and Eric Reuland: 1993, 'Reflexivity', Linguistic Inquiry 24, 657-720.
31. Ross, J. R.: 1972, 'Act', in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language. Reidel, Dordrecht.
32. Ross, J. R.: 1997, 'That Is the Question', paper presented at the University of Pennsylvania.
33. Rothstein, Susan: 1995, 'Small Clauses and Copular Constructions', in A. Cardinaletti and M.T. Guasti (eds.), Small Clauses, pp. 27-48, Academic Press, New York.
34. Rothstein, Susan: 2000, Predicates and Their Subjects. Kluwer, Dordrecht.
35. Schlenker, Philippe: to appear, 'Clausal Equations (A Note on the Connectivity Problem)', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory.
36. Sharvit, Yael: 1997, The Syntax and Semantics of Functional Relative Clauses, PhD dissertation, Rutgers University.
37. Sharvit, Yael: 1999, 'Connectivity in Specificational Sentences', Natural Language Semantics 7, 299-339.
38. Sichel, Ivy: 1997, 'Two Pronominal Copulas and the Syntax of Hebrew Nonverbal Sentences', in R.C. Blight and M.Y. Moosally (eds.), Proceedings of the 1997 TLS Conference, pp. 295-306. Dept. of Linguistics, University of Texas at Austin.
39. Szabolcsi, Anna: 1987, 'Comparative Superlatives', in N. Fukui et al. (eds.), Papers in Theoretical Linguistics (MITWPL 8), pp. 266-280. MIT, Cambridge, Mass.
40. Williams, Edwin: 1983, 'Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories', Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 423-446.
41. Zimmermann, Thomas Ede: 1993, 'On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs', Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179.