Design Navigator system: A case study in improving product development through improved information management

Proceedings of the ASME International Design Engineering Technical Conferences and Computers and Information in Engineering Conference - DETC2005

Volumn 3 A, Issue , 2005, Pages 291-302

  Karnik, M V ^a   Gupta, S K ^b   Anand, D K ^b   Valenta, F J ^c   Wexler, I A ^c  

^a Iktara and Associates LLC   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND   (United States)

^c NAVAL SURFACE WARFARE CENTER   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ASSEMBLY; COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN; INFORMATION ANALYSIS; INFORMATION RETRIEVAL; INTERFACES (COMPUTER); PRODUCT DEVELOPMENT; QUERY LANGUAGES;

CHANGE-BASED QUERIES; DESIGN NAVIGATOR SYSTEM; FUNCTIONALITY-BASED QUERIES; GEOMETRY-BASED QUERIES;

INFORMATION MANAGEMENT;

EID: 33144481281     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: 10.1115/detc2005-84901     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (36)

1. [Alla01] C. Allauzen, M. Crochemore, and M. Raffinot. Efficient experimental string matching by weak factor recognition. In Proceedings of 12th Annual Symposium on Combinatorial Pattern Matching, pages 51-72, 2001.
2. [Amao94] A. Aamodt, and E. Plazas. Case-based reasoning: foundational issues, methodological variations, and system approaches. AI Communications, 1994:7(1)39-52.
3. [Balm04] L. Balmelli and A. Moore. Requirements Modeling for System Engineering Using SYSML, The Systems Modeling Language. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57751, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004.
4. [Beck03] B. Becker and N. Wang. ERMM: An Engineering Requirements Management Method. In CIE Conference. Paper CIE-48238, Chicago, IL, September 2003.
5. [Bens01] M. Benson and J. Terpenny. A Survey of Methods and Approaches to Knowledge Management in the Product Development Environment. In CIE, Paper CIE-21288, Pittsburgh, PA, September 2001.
6. [Bilg97] T. Bilgic and D. Rock. Product data management systems: state-of-the-art and the future. In DETC and CIE Conference, September 1997, Sacramento, CA.
7. [Bohm04] M. R. Bohm and R. B. Stone. Representing Functionality to Support Reuse: Conceptual and Supporting Functions. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57693, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004.
8. [Card03] A. Cardone, S.K. Gupta, and M.V. Karnik. A survey of shape similarity assessment algorithms for product design & manufacturing applications. Journal of Computing & Information Science in Engineering, 3(2): 109-118, June 2003.
9. [Card04] A. Cardone, S.K. Gupta, and M.V. Kamik. Identifying similar parts for assisting cost estimation of prismatic machined parts. In ASME Design for Manufacturing Conference, Salt Lake City, Utah, September 2004.
10. [Fenv01] S.J. Fenves. A core product model for representing design information. Technical Report, Number NISTIR6736, National Institute of Standards and Technology, Gaithersburg, MD, USA, 2001.
11. [Fisc04] X. Fischer, C. Merlo, J. Legardeur, L. Zimmer, and A. Anglada. Knowledge Management and Support Environment in Early Phases of Design Process. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57791, Salt Lake City, UT, September-October 2004.
12. [Fu03] M. W. Fu and W. F. Lu. Modeling and Management of Design Requirements in Product Deveopment Life Cycle. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-48236, Chicago, IL, September 2003.
13. [Hall80] P. Hall and G. Dowling. Approximate String Matching. ACM Computing Surveys. 12(4):381-402, 1980.
14. [Hirs97] D.S. Hirschberg. Serial computations of Levenshtein distances. Pattern Matching Algorithms, 4:123-142, 1997.
15. [Hirt01] J. Hirtz, R. Stone, D. McAdams, S. Szykman, and K. Wood. A functional basis for engineering design: reconciling and evolving previous efforts. Research In Engineering Design, 13(2):65-82, March 2002.
16. [Hu00] X. Hu, J. Pang, Y. Pang, M. Atwood, W. Sun, and W.C. Regli. A survey on design rationale: representation, capture and retrieval. In 5th DFM Conference, Paper DFM-14008, Baltimore, September 2000.
17. [Karn05] M. Kamik, D.K. Anand, E. Eick, S. K. Gupta, and R. Kavetsky. Integrated Visual and Geometric Search Tools for Locating Desired Part in Part Database. Accepted in CAD'05 Conference, Bangkok, Thailand, June 2005.
18. [Kirs98] C. F. Kirschman and G. M. Fadel. Classifying functions for mechanical design. ASME Journal of Mechanical Design, 120(3)475-482, 1998.
19. [Kolo93] J. L. Kolodner. Case-Based Reasoning, Morgan Kaufmann Publishers, San Mateo, California. 1993.
20. [Lee97] J. Lee. Design Rationale Systems: Understanding the Issues. IEEE Expert, 12(3) 78-85, 1997.
21. [Li04] Z. Li, M. Liu, and K. Ramani. Review of Product Information Retrieval: Representation & Indexing. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57749, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004.
22. [Mahe97] M. L. Maher and P. Pu (eds.). Issues and Applications of Case-based Reasoning in Design, Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Hillsdale, NJ, 1997.
23. [Mock04] G. Mocko, R. Malak, C. Paredis, and R. Peak. A Knowledge Repository for Behavioral Models in Engineering Design. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57746, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004.
24. [Neel03] J. Neelamkavil and M. Kemahan. A Framework for Design Knowledge Reuse. In CIE Conference. Paper CIE-48215, Chicago, IL, September 2003.
25. [Nom04] Y. Nomaguchi, A. Ohnuma, and K. Fujita. Design Rationale Acquisition in Conceptual Design by Hierarchical Integration of Action, Model and Argumentation. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57681, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004.
26. [Panc04] J. H. Panchal, M. G. Fernandez, C. J. J. Paredis, J. K. Allen, and F. Mistree. Designing Design Processes in Product Lifecycle Management: Research Issues and Strategies. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-57742, Salt Lake City, UT, September 2004.
27. [Pena95] F. Pena-Mora, D. Sriram, R. Logcher. Design rationale for computer-supported conflict mitigation. ASCE Journal of Computing in Civil Engineering, 57-72, 1995.
28. [Shah95] J.J. Shah and M. Mantyla. Parametric and Feature-Based CAD/CAM. John Wiley and Sons, New York, 1995.
29. [Ston00] R.B. Stone and K.L. Wood. Development of a functional basis for design. Journal of Mechanical Design, 122(4):359-370, December 2000.
30. [Shoo00] S. Shooter, W. T. Keirouz, S. Szykman and S. Fenves. A model for information flow in design. In ASME Design Theory and Methodology Conference, Baltimore, Maryland, September 2000.
31. [Sunn03] S. Sunnersjo, I. Rask, and R. Amen. Requirement-Driven Design Process with Integrated Knowledge Structures. In CIE Conference, Paper CIE-48218, Chicago, IL, USA, September 2003.
32. [Syca92] K. Sycara, D. NavinChandra, R. Guttal, J. Koning, and S. Narasimhan. CADET: a case-based synthesis tool for engineering design. International Journal of Expert Systems, 4(2) 157-188, 1992.
33. [Szyk01] S. Szykman, R.D. Sriram and W. C. Regli. The role of knowledge in next-generation product development systems. Journal of Computation and Information Science in Engineering, 1(1):3-11, 2001.
34. [Umed96] Y. Umeda, M. Ishii, M. Yoshioka, Y. Shimomura and T. Tomiyama. Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler. Artificial Intelligence for Engineering Design, Analysis and Manufacturing, 10:275-288, 1996.
35. [Varg04] N. Vargas-Hemandez and J.J. Shah. 2nd-CAD: a tool for conceptual systems design in electromechanical domain. Journal of Computing and Information Science in Engineering, 4(3):28-36, 2004.
36. [Xu04] C. Xu, S.K. Gupta, and Z. Yao. A framework for conceptual design of multiple interaction state mechatronic systems. In Tools and Methods of Competitive Engineering Conference, Lausanne, Switzerland, April 2004