Evaluation of the fighting back initiative

New Directions for Evaluation

Volumn 2005, Issue 105, 2005, Pages 15-38

  Sherwood, Kay E ^a  

^a Independent Consultant and Writer   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144473332     PISSN: 10976736     EISSN: 1534875X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/ev.142     Document Type: Article

References (9)

1. Beveridge, A., and others.“Monitoring Archival Indicators of Alcohol and Other Drug Harm: A Fighting Back Progress Report.“May 2, 1997.
2. Hallfors, D., Cho, H., Livert, D., and Kadushin, C., “Fighting Back Against Substance Abuse: Are Community Coalitions Winning?“American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 2002, 23(4), 237-245.
3. Hollister, R. G., and Hill, J., “Problems in the Evaluation of Community-Wide Initiatives.“In J. P.Connell, A. C.Kubisch, L. B.Schorr and C. H.Weiss (eds.), New Approaches to Evaluating Community Initiatives: Concepts, Methods, and Contexts.Washington, D.C.: Aspen Institute, 1995.
4. Jellinek, P. S., and Hearn, R. P., “Fighting Drug Abuse at the Local Level.“Issues in Science and Technology, 1991, 7(4), 78-84.
5. Patton, M. Q., Utilization-Focused Evaluation.(3rd ed.)Thousand Oaks, Calif.: Sage, 1997.
6. Robert Wood Johnson Foundation.Annual Report 2000: The Challenge of Substance Abuse: Ten Years of Grantmaking.Princeton, N.J.: Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, n.d.
7. Saxe, L., Reber, E., Hallfors, D., and Stirratt, M. J., “Taking the Long View: Evaluating Community-Based Efforts to Reduce Substance Abuse.“In L. Saxe and others, “Fighting Back Evaluation Mid-Project Report.“Aug. 30, 1996.
8. Saxe, L., and others.“Fighting Back Evaluation: Interim Report.“Nov. 22, 1995.
9. Saxe, L., and others.“Think Globally, Act Locally: Assessing the Impact of Community-Based Substance Abuse Prevention.“Evaluation and Program Planning, 1997, 20(3), 357-366.