Concealed questions and specificational subjects

Linguistics and Philosophy

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 687-737

  Romero, Maribel ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 33144461001     PISSN: 01650157     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s10988-005-2654-9     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Akmajian, A.: 1970, 'On Deriving Cleft Sentences from Pseudocleft Sentences', Linguistic Inquiry 1, 140-168.
2. Beck, S. and H. Rullmann: 1999, 'A Flexible Approach to Exhaustivity in Questions', Natural Language Semantics 7, 249-298.
3. Bošković, Z.: 1997, 'Pseudoclefts', Studia Linguistica 51, 235-277.
4. Brisson, C.: 1998, Distributivity, Maximality, and Floating Quantifiers, Rutgers Ph.D. dissertation.
5. Büring, D.: 1998, 'Identity, Modality, and the Candidate Behind the Wall', in D. Strolovitch and A. Lawson (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory VIII, CLC, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, pp. 36-54.
6. Caponigro, I.: 2004, 'The Semantic Contribution of Wi-words And Type-Shifts: Evidence from Free Relatives Crosslinguistically', in R. Young (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV, CLC, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, pp. 38-55.
7. Caponigro, I. and D. Heller: 2003, 'The Non-Concealed Nature of Free Relatives: Implications for Connectivity', talk at the Workshop on Direct Compositionality, Brown University. To appear in P. Jacobson and C. Barker (eds.), Direct Compositionality.
8. Cecchetto, C.: 2000, 'Connectivity and Anti-connectivity in Pseudoclefts', in M. Hirotani, A. Coetzee, N. Hall and J.-Y. Kim (eds.), Proceedings of the North East Linguistic Society 30, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA, pp. 137-151.
9. Chomsky, N.: 1986, Knowledge of Language: Its Nature, Origin and Use, Praeger, New York.
10. den Dikken, M., A. Meinunger, and C. Wilder: 2000, 'Pseudoclefts and Ellipsis', Studia Linguistica 54, 41-89.
11. Donnellan, K.: 1966, 'Reference and Definite Descriptions', Philosophical Review 75, 281-304.
12. Farkas, D.: 1993, 'Modal Anchoring and NP Scope', Linguistics Research Center working paper LRC-93-08, UC Santa Cruz.
13. Groenendijk, J. and M. Stokhof: 1984, Studies on the Semantics of Questions and the Pragmatics of Answers, Ph.D. thesis, University of Amsterdam.
14. Halvorsen, P. K.: 1978, The Syntax and Semantics of Cleft Constructions, Ph.D. dissertation, University of Texas, Austin.
15. Heggie, L.: 1988, The Syntax of Copular Structures, USC Ph.D. dissertation.
16. Heim, I.: 1979, 'Concealed Questions', in R. Bäuerle, U. Egli, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Semantics from Different Points of View, Springer, Berlin, pp. 51-60.
17. Heim, I.: 1994, 'Interrogative Semantics and Karttunen's Semantics for Know', in R. Buchalla and A. Mittwoch (eds.), Proceedings of the Israeli Association for Theoretical Linguistics I, Jerusalem.
18. Heim, I. and A. Kratzer: 1998, Semantics in Generative Grammar, Blackwell, Oxford.
19. Heller, D.: 2002, 'On the Relation of Connectivity and Specificational Pseudoclefts', Natural Language Semantics 10, 243-284.
20. Heycock, C. and A. Kroch: 1999, 'Pseudocleft Connectedness: Implications for the LF interface level', Linguistic Inquiry 30, 365-397.
21. Heycock, C. and A. Kroch: 2002, 'Topic, Focus, and Syntactic Representations', in L. Mikkelsen and C. Potts (eds.), Proceedings of WCCFL 21, Cascadilla Press, Somerville MA, pp. 141-165.
22. Higgins, R.: 1973, The Pseudocleft Construction in English, Ph.D. Dissertation, MIT [revised version published by Garland, New York, 1979; page references are to this version].
23. Jacobson, P.: 1994, 'Binding Connectivity in Copular Sentences', in M. Harvey and L. Santelmann (eds.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory IV, CLC, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, pp. 161-178.
24. Karttunen, L.: 1977, 'Syntax and Semantics of Questions', Linguistics and Philosophy 1, 3-44.
25. Kratzer, A.: 2002, 'Facts: Particulars or Information Units?', Linguistics and Philosophy 25, 655-670.
26. Link, G.: 1983, 'The Logical Analysis of Plurals and Mass Terms', in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 302-323.
27. Mikkelsen, L.: 2004, Specifying Who: On the Structure, Meaning, and Use of Specificational Copular Clauses, UCSC Ph.D. dissertation.
28. Moltmann, F.: 1997, 'Intensional Verbs and Quantifiers', Natural Language Semantics 5, 1-52.
29. Moro, A.: 1997, The Raising of Predicates: Predicative Noun Phrases and the Theory of Clause Structure, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
30. Partee, B.: 2000, 'Copula Inversion Puzzles in English and Russian', in K. Kusumoto and E. Villalta (eds.), UMOP 23: Issues in Semantics and its Interface, GLSA, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA, pp. 198-208.
31. Partee, B. and M. Rooth: 1983, 'Generalized Conjunction and Type Ambiguity', in R. Bäuerle, C. Schwarze, and A. von Stechow (eds.), Meaning, Use and Interpretation of Language, Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, pp. 361-383.
32. Percus, O.: 2000, 'Constraints on Some Other Variables in Syntax', Natural Language Semantics 8, 173-229.
33. Romero, M.: 2004a, 'Intensional Noun Phrases with Know and Be', Catalan Journal of Linguistics 3, 147-178.
34. Romero, M.: 2004b, 'Tense and Intensionality in Specificational Copular Sentences', in R. Young (ed.), Proceedings of Semantics and Linguistic Theory XIV, CLC, Cornell University, Ithaca NY, pp. 271-288.
35. Romero, M.: To appear, 'Connectivity in a Unified Analysis of Specificational Subjects and Concealed Questions', in P. Jacobson and C. Barker (eds.), Direct Compositionality.
36. Ross, J. R.: 1972, 'Act', in D. Davidson and G. Harman (eds.), Semantics of Natural Language, Reidel, Dordrecht, pp. 70-126.
37. Ross, J. R.: 2000, 'The Frozenness of Pseudoclefts - Towards an Inequality-Based Syntax', ms. University of North Texas.
38. Schlenker, P.: 2003, 'Clausal Equations (A Note on the Connectivity Problem)', Natural Language and Linguistic Theory 21, 157-214.
39. Sharvit, Y.: 1999, 'Connectivity in Specificational Sentences', Natural Language Semantics 7, 299-339.
40. Sharvit, Y.: 2003, 'Tense and Identity in Copular Constructions', Natural Language Semantics 11, 363-393.
41. Williams, E.: 1983, 'Semantic vs. Syntactic Categories', Linguistics and Philosophy 6, 423-446.
42. Zimmermann, E.: 1993, 'On the Proper Treatment of Opacity in Certain Verbs', Natural Language Semantics 1, 149-179.
43. Zimmermann, E.: 2005, 'Coercion vs. Indeterminacy in Opaque Verbs', in R. Kahle (ed.), Intensionality, Association for Symbolic Logic, UC San Diego, pp. 217-265 [available at http://web.uni-frankfurt.de/fb10/zimmermann/; page references are to this version].