How flag states lost the plot over shipping's governance. Does a ship need a sovereign?

Maritime Policy and Management

Volumn 33, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 75-81

  Kovats, Laszlo J ^a  

^a LAWSON HEALTH RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

SHIPPING; SOVEREIGNTY;

EID: 33144454999     PISSN: 03088839     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/03088830500513311     Document Type: Note

References (14)

1. Drucker, PF.(1977) Management. Pan Books.
2. (2005) The Sea. London: The Mission to Seafarers. Issue 176
3. Draft Code for the Implementation of [Mandatory] IMO Instruments.
4. Ships, Slaves and Competition, International Commission on Shipping, 2000. Charlestown, Australia 2290 - paragraphs 2.24-2.26 and 10.46-10.48 relate specifically to flag states. The previous quote, at the beginning of the paragraph is from evidence submitted to the commission no. 120 on the above website
5. Loughlin, M.(2003) The Idea of Public Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
6. and quoting from M. Oakshott, 1975, 'On the Civil Condition', in his On Human Condition (Oxford: Clarendon Press), p. 218
7. Rawls, J.(1999) A Theory of Justice. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
8. Ibid.
9. Ibid.
10. Ibid.
11. Ibid.
12. Sub-Group of High Level Tripartite Working Group on Maritime Labour Standards (First Meeting). Geneva2000. In [pp.].
13. Standing, Guy.(2002) Beyond the New Paternalism. (Verso)
14. ILO publication.(). Recommendation 193, Recommendation Concerning the Promotion of Co-operatives. Geneva20 June2002. In adopted by the Conference at its Ninetieth Session [pp.].