Retrograde cortical and deep venous drainage in patients with intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: Comparison of MR imaging and angiographic findings

American Journal of Neuroradiology

Volumn 26, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 1532-1538

  Kitajima, Mika ^a   Hirai, Toshinori ^a   Korogi, Yukunori ^b   Yamura, Masayuki ^a   Kawanaka, Koichi ^a   Ikushima, Ichiro ^a   Hayashida, Yoshiko ^a   Yamashita, Yasuyuki ^a   Kuratsu, Junichi ^a  

^a KUMAMOTO UNIV SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (Japan)

^b UNIVERSITY OF OCCUPATIONAL AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ANGIOGRAPHY; ARTERIOVENOUS FISTULA; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; CORRELATION ANALYSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DISEASE SEVERITY; FEMALE; HUMAN; MALE; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; BRAIN ANGIOGRAPHY; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM MALFORMATION; COMPARATIVE STUDY; METHODOLOGY; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY; WOUND DRAINAGE;

AGED; CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM VASCULAR MALFORMATIONS; CEREBRAL ANGIOGRAPHY; DRAINAGE; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES;

EID: 32944482545     PISSN: 01956108     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. Vinuela F, Fox AJ, Pelz DM, Drake CG. Unusual clinical manifestations of dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:554-558
2. Cognard C, Gobin YP, Pierot L, et al. Cerebral dural arteriovenous fistulas: clinical and angiographic correlation with a revised classification of venous drainage. Radiology 1995;194:671-680
3. Obrador S, Solo M, Silvela J. Clinical syndromes of arteriovenous malformations of the transvers-sigmoid sinus. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1975;38:436-451
4. Borden JA, Wu KW, Shucart WA. A proposed classification for spinal and cranial dural arteriovenous fistulous malformations and implications for treatment. J Neurosurg 1995;82:166-179
5. Lasjaunias P, Chiu M, terBrugge K, et al. Neurological manifestations of intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations. J Neurosurg 1986;64:724-730
6. Cognard C, Casasco A, Toevi M, et al. Dural arteriovenous fistulas as a cause of intracranial hypertension due to impairment of cranial venous outflow. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 1998;65:308-316
7. Davies M, terBrugge K, Willinsky RA, et al. The validity of classifications for the clinical presentations of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas. J Neurosurg 1996;85:830-837
8. Brown R, Wiebers DO, Nichols D. Intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulae: angiographic predictors of intracranial hemorrhage and clinical outcome in non surgical patients. J Neurosurg 1994;81:531-538
9. Hurst RW, Bagley LJ, Galetta S, et al. Dementia from dural arteriovenous fistulas: the pathologic findings of venous hypertensive encephalopathy. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:1267-1273
10. Ishii K, Goto K, Ihara K, et al. High-risk dural arteriovenous fistulae of the transverse and sigmoid sinuses. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1987;8:1113-1120
11. Awad IA, Little JR, Akrawi WP, Ahl J. Intracranial dural arteriovenous malformations: factors predisposing to an aggressive neurological course. J Neurosurg 1990;72:839-850
12. Barnwell SL, Halbach VV, Dowd CF, et al. Avariant of arteriovenous fistula s within the wall of dural sinuses: results of combined surgical and endovascular therapy. J Neurosurg 1991;74:199-204
13. Willinsky R, Goyal M, terBrugge K, Montanera W. Tortuous, engorged pial veins in intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: correlations with presentation, location, and MR findings in 122 patients. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1999;20:1031-1036
14. Hirai T, Korogi Y, Hamatake S, et al. Three-dimensional FISP imaging in the evaluation of carotid cavernous fistula: comparison with contrast-enhanced CT and spin-echo MR. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 1998;19:253-259
15. Liang L, Korogi Y, Takahashi M, et al. Evaluation of the intracranial dural sinuses with a 3D contrast-enhanced MP-RAGE sequence: prospective comparison with 2D-TOF venography and digital subtraction angiography. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol 2001;22:481-492
16. Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Nitz WR. MP RAGE: a three-dimensional, T1-weighted, gradient-echo sequence: initial experience in the brain. Radiology 1992;182:769-775
17. Fellner F, Holl K, Held P, et al. A T1-weighted rapid three-dimensional gradient-echo technique (MP-RAGE) in preoperative MRI of intracranial tumors. Neuroradiology 1996;38:199-206
18. Brant-Zawadzki M, Gillan GD, Atkinson DJ, et al. Three-dimensional MR imaging and display of intracranial disease: improvements with the MP-RAGE sequence and gadolinium. J Magn Reson Imaging 1993;3:656-662
19. Runge VM, Kirsch JE, Thomas GS, Mugler JP. Clinical comparison of three-dimensional MP-RAGE and FLASH techniques for MR imaging of the head. J Magn Reson Imaging 1991;1:493-500
20. Mirowitz SA. Intracranial lesion enhancement with gadolinium: T1-weighted spin-echo versus three-dimensional Fourier transform gradient-echo MR imaging. Radiology 1992;185:529-534
21. Stevenson J, Knopp EA, Litt AW. MP-RAGE subtraction venography: a new technique. J Magn Reson Imaging 1995;5:239-241
22. Chen J, Tsuruda JS, Halbach VV. Suspected dural arteriovenous fistula: results with screening MR angiography in seven patients. Radiology 1992;183:265-271
23. Vinuela F, Fox A, Debrun G, et al. Spontaneous carotid-cavernous fistulas: clinical, radiological, and therapeutic considerations. J Neurosurg 1984;60:976-984
24. Kiyosue H, Hon Y, Okahara M, et al. Treatment of intracranial dural arteriovenous fistulas: current strategies based on location and hemodynamics, and alternative techniques of transcatheter embolization. Radiographics 2004;24:1637-1653
25. Aoki S, Yoshikawa T, Hori M, et al. Two-dimensional thick-slice MR digital subtraction angiography for assessment of cerebrovascular occlusive diseases. Eur Radiol 2000;10:1858-1864
26. Yoshikawa T, Aoki S, Hori M, et al. Time-resolved two-dimensional thick-slice magnetic resonance digital subtraction angiography in assessing brain tumors. Eur Radiol 2000;10:736-744