U.S. university research parks

Journal of Productivity Analysis

Volumn 25, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 43-55

  Link, Albert N ^a   Scott, John T ^b  

^a UNIVERSITY OF NORTH CAROLINA AT GREENSBORO   (United States)

^b Lamont Doherty Earth Observatory   (United States)

Author keywords

Research park; Science park; Technology transfer; University research

Indexed keywords

EID: 32944480882     PISSN: 0895562X     EISSN: 15730441     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s11123-006-7126-x     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Adams JD (2002) Comparative localization of academic and industrial spillovers. J Econ Geogr 2:253-278
2. Adams JD, Jaffe AB (1996) Bounding the effects of R&D: an investigation using matched establishment-firm data. Rand J Econ 94:700-721
3. Association of University Related Research Parks (AURRP) 1997. Worldwide Research & Science Park Directory 1998. BPI Communications
4. Bozeman B (2000) Technology transfer and public policy: a review of research and theory. Res Policy 29:627-656
5. Bozeman B, Crow M (1991) Red tape and technology transfer in U.S. government laboratories. J Technol Transf 16:29-37
6. Brod AC, Link AN (2001) Trends in cooperative research activity. In Feldman MP, Link AN (eds) Innovation policy in the knowledge-based economy. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Boston
7. Cohen W (2002) Thoughts and questions on science parks, presented at the National Science Foundation Science Parks Indicators Workshop, University of North Carolina at Greensboro, November 2002
8. (Also in A.N. Link. Final Report to the National Science Foundation on Science Park Indicators Workshop, January 2003.)
9. Danilov VJ (1971) The Research park shake-out. Ind Res 13:1-4
10. Feldman MP (1999) The new economics of innovation, spillovers and agglomeration: a review of empirical studies. Econ. Innovation New Technol 8:5-25
11. Feldman MP, Lichtenberg F (2002) Innovation, imitation and distance in the pharmaceutical industry. Johns Hopkins University, mimeographed
12. Griliches Z (1986) Productivity growth, R&D, and basic research at the firm level in the 1970s. Am Econ Rev 76:141-154
13. Hagedoorn J, Link AN, Vonortas NS (2000) Research partnerships Res Policy 29:567-586
14. Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT (2001) Barriers inhibiting industry from partnering with universities: evidence from the advanced technology program. J Technol Transf 26:87-98
15. Hall BH, Link AN, Scott JT (2003) Universities as research partners. Rev Econ Stat 85:485-491
16. Link AN (1981) Basic research and productivity increase in manufacturing: some additional evidence. Am Econ Rev 71:1111-1112
17. Link AN (1995) A Generosity of spirit: The early history of the Research Triangle Park. University of North Carolina Press for the Research Triangle Park Foundation: Research Triangle Park NC
18. Link AN (2002) From seed to harvest: the history of the growth of the research triangle park. University of North Carolina Press for the Research Triangle Park Foundation: Research Triangle Park NC
19. Link AN, Link KR (2003) On the growth of U.S. science parks. J Technol Transf 28:81-85
20. Link AN, Siegel DS (2003) Technolgical change and economic performance, Routledge, London.
21. Link AN, Scott JT (2003a) The growth of Research Triangle Park. Small Bus Econ 20:167-175
22. Link AN, Scott JT (2003b) U.S. science parks: the diffusion of an innovation and its effects on the academic mission of universities. Int J Ind Org 21:1323-1356
23. Mansfield E (1980) Basic research and the productivity increase in manufacturing. Am Econ Rev 70:863-873
24. National Science Board (2002) Science and engineering indicators, 2002. Government Printing Office, Arlington, VA
25. Nekar A, Shane S (2003) When do start-ups that exploit patented academic knowledge survive. Int J Ind Org 21:1391-1410
26. Nelson RR (1993) National innovation systems: a comparative analysis. Oxford University Press New York.
27. Porter M (2001) Clusters of innovation: regional foundations of U.S. competitiveness. Council on Competitiveness Washington, DC
28. Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link AN (1999) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of uni versity technology transfer offices. NBER Working Paper 2756. July 1999
29. Siegel DS, Waldman D, Link AN (2003) Assessing the impact of organizational practices on the relative productivity of university technology transfer offices: an exploratory study. Res Policy 32:27-48
30. Swann GMP, Prevezer M, Stout D (1998) The dynamics of industrial clustering. Oxford University Press, Oxford
31. Wallsten S (2001) An empirical test of geographic knowledge spillovers using geographic information systems and firm-level data. Reg Sci Urban Econ 31:571-599