Randomized controlled trial of LigaSure with submucosal dissection versus ferguson hemorrhoidectomy for prolapsed hemorrhoids

World Journal of Surgery

Volumn 30, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 462-466

  Wang, Jaw Yuan ^a   Lu, Chien Yu ^a   Tsai, Hsiang Lin ^b   Chen, Fang Ming ^a   Huang, Che Jen ^a   Huang, Yu Sheng ^a   Huang, Tsung Jen ^a   Hsieh, Jan Sing ^a  

^a KAOHSIUNG MEDICAL UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

^b I SHOU UNIVERSITY   (Taiwan)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ANALGESIC AGENT;

ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; BLEEDING; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DEMOGRAPHY; DIATHERMY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; HEMORRHOID; HEMORRHOIDECTOMY; HOSPITALIZATION; HUMAN; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MALE; OPERATION DURATION; PAIN ASSESSMENT; POSTOPERATIVE COMPLICATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; STATISTICAL SIGNIFICANCE; SUBMUCOSA; SURGICAL TECHNIQUE; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

ADULT; AGED; DISSECTION; FEMALE; HEMORRHOIDS; HUMANS; LIGATION; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PAIN MEASUREMENT; PAIN, POSTOPERATIVE; PROSPECTIVE STUDIES; TREATMENT OUTCOME;

EID: 32944473441     PISSN: 03642313     EISSN: 14322323     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1007/s00268-005-0297-1     Document Type: Article

References (18)

1. MacRae HM, McLeod RS. Comparison of hemorrhoidal treatment modalities: a meta-analysis. Dis Colon Rectum 1995;38:687-694.
2. Ho YH, Seow-Choen F, Tan M, et al. Randomized controlled trial of open and closed haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 1997;84:1729-1730.
3. Milligan ET, Morgan CN, Jones LE, et al. Surgical anatomy of the anal canal, and the operative treatment of haemorrhoids. Lancet 1937;2:119-124.
4. Ferguson JA, Heaton JR. Closed hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 1959;2:176-179.
5. Sayfan J, Becker A, Koltun L. Sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy: a new technique. Ann Surg 2001;234:21-24.
6. Rowsell M, Bello M, Hemingway DM. Circumferential mucosectomy (stapled haemorrhoidectomy) versus conventional haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled trial. Lancet 2000;355:779-781.
7. Armstrong DN, Ambroze WL, Schertzer ME, et al. Harmonic Scalpel vs. electrocautery hemorrhoidectomy: a prospective evaluation. Dis Colon Rectum 2001;44:558-564.
8. Palazzo FF, Francis DL, Clifton MA. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure™ versus open haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:154-157.
9. Jayne DG, Botterill I, Ambrose NS, et al. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure™ versus conventional diathermy for day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Br J Surg 2002;89:428-432.
10. Thorbeck CV, Montes MF. Haemorrhoidectomy: randomised controlled clinical trial of Ligasure® compared with Milligan-Morgan operation. Eur J Surg 2002;168:482-484.
11. Chung YC, Wu HJ. Clinical experience of sutureless closed hemorrhoidectomy. with Ligasure™. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:87-92.
12. Franklin EJ, Seetharam S, Lowney J, et al. Randomized clinical trial of Ligasure™ vs. conventional diathermy in hemorrhoidectomy. Dis Colon Rectum 2003;46:1380-1383.
13. Andrews BT, Layer GT, Jackson BT, et al. Randomized trial comparing diathermy hemorrhoidectomy with the scissor dissection Milligan-Morgan operation. Dis Colon Rectum 1993;36:580-583.
14. London NJ, Bramley PD, Windle R. Effect of four days of preoperative lactulose on posthaemorrhoidectomy pain: results of placebo controlled trial. BMJ 1987;295:363-364.
15. Carapeti EA, Kamm MA, McDonald PJ, et al. Double-blind randomised controlled trial of effect of metronidazole on pain after day-case haemorrhoidectomy. Lancet 1998;351:169-172.
16. Galizia G, Lieto E, Castellano P, et al. Lateral internal sphincterotomy together with haemorrhoidectomy for treatment of haemorrhoids: a randomised prospective study. Eur J Surg 2000;166:223-228.
17. Basdanis G, Papadopoulos VN, Michalopoulos A, et al. Randomized clinical trial of stapled hemorrhoidectomy vs open with Ligasure for prolapsed piles. Surg Endosc 2005;19:235-239.
18. Oughriss M, Yver R, Faucheron JL. Complications of stapled hemorrhoidectomy: a French multicentric study. Gastroenterol Clin Biol 2005;29:429-433.