Hedging in scientific articles as a means of classifying citations

AAAI Spring Symposium - Technical Report

Volumn SS-04-07, Issue , 2005, Pages 50-54

  Di Marco, Chrysanne ^a   Mercer, Robert E ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

INFORMATION ANALYSIS;

ARGUMENTATION STRUCTURE; RHETORICAL RELATIONS; SCIENTIFIC ARTICLES;

TECHNICAL WRITING;

EID: 32944464039     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (26)

1. Cole, S. 1975. The growth of scientific knowledge: Theories of deviance as a case study. In The idea of social structure: Papers in honor of Robert K. Merton. New York: Harcourt, Brace Jovanovich. 175-220.
2. DiMarco, C., and Mercer, R. 2003. Toward a catalogue of citation-related rhetorical cues in scientific texts. In Proceedings of the Pacific Association for Computational Linguistics (PACLING) Conference.
3. Duncan, E.; Anderson, F.; and McAleese, R. 1981. Qualified citation indexing: Its relevance to educational technology. In Information Retrieval in Educational Technology: Proceedings of the First Symposium on Information Retrieval in Educational Technology, 70-79. University of Aberdeen.
4. Fahnestock, J. 1999. Rhetorical figures in science. Oxford University Press.
5. Finney, B. 1979. The reference characteristics of scientific texts. Master's thesis, The City University of London.
6. Frost, C. 1979. The use of citations in literary research: A preliminary classification of citation functions. Library Quarterly 49:399-414.
7. Garfield, E. 1965. Can citation indexing be automated? In Stevens, M., et al., eds., Statistical Association Methods for Mechanical Documentation (NBS Misc. Pub. 269). Washington, DC: National Bureau of Standards.
8. Garzone, M., and Mercer, R. 2000. Towards an automated citation classifier. In Proceedings of the 13th Biennial Conference of the CSCSI/SCEIO (AI'2000), 337-346.
9. Garzone, M. 1996. Automated classification of citations using linguistic semantic grammars. Master's thesis, The University of Western Ontario.
10. Gross, A.; Harmon, J.; and Reidy, M. 2002. Communicating science: The scientific article from the 17th century to the present. Oxford University Press.
11. Gross, A. 1996. The rhetoric of science. Harvard University Press.
12. Hyland, K. 1998. Hedging in scientific research articles. John Benjamins Publishing.
13. Lakoff, R. 1972. The pragmatics of modality. In Papers from the Eighth Regional Meeting, P. Peranteau, J. Levi, and G. Phares (eds.), 229-46. Chicago Linguistics Society.
14. Lipetz, B. 1965. Problems of citation analysis: Critical review. American Documentation 16:381-390.
15. Mercer, R., and DiMarco, C. 2003. The importance of finegrained cue phrases in scientific citations. In Proceedings of the 16th Conference of the CSCSI/SCEIO (AI'2003).
16. Mercer, R.; DiMarco, C.; and Kroon, F. 2004. The frequency of hedging cues in citation contexts in scientific writing. In submission to the 17th Conference of the CSCSI/SCEIO (AI'2004).
17. Moravscik, M., and Murugesan, P. 1975. Some results on the function and quality of citations. Social Studies of Science 5:86-92.
18. Myers, G. 1989. The pragmatics of politeness in scientific articles. Applied Linguistics 10(1): 1-35.
19. Myers, G. 1991. Writing biology. University of Wisconsin Press.
20. Nanba, H., and Okumura, M. 1999. Towards multi-paper summarization using reference information. In Proceedings of the 16th International Joint Conferences on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI-99), 926-931.
21. Nanba, H.; Kando, N.; and Okumura, M. 2000. Classification of research papers using citation links and citation types: Towards automatic review article generation. In Proceedings of the American Society for Information Science (ASIS)/The 11th SIG Classification Research Workshop, Classification for User Support and Learning, 117-134.
22. Peritz, B. 1983. A classification of citation roles for the social sciences and related fields. Scientometrics 5:303-312.
23. Small, H. 1982. Citation content analysis. Progress in Communication Sciences 3:287-310.
24. Spiegel-Rösing, I. 1977. Science studies: Bibliometric and content analysis. Social Studies of Science 7:97-113.
25. Teufel, S. 1999. Argumentative zoning: Information extraction from scientific articles. Ph.D. thesis, University of Edinburgh.
26. Weinstock, M. 1971. Citation indexes. In Encyclopaedia of Library and Information Science, volume 5. New York: Marcel Dekkar. 16-40.