The functionality and reliability of an Internet interface for assessments of endoscopic still images and video clips: Distributed research in gastroenterology

Gastrointestinal Endoscopy

Volumn 63, Issue 3, 2006, Pages 445-452

  De Lange, T ^a   Svensen, A M ^b   Larsen, S ^c   Aabakken, L ^d  

^a ULLEVÅL UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

^b Oppland Central Hospital   (Norway)

^c NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

^d OSLO UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL   (Norway)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DISEASE SEVERITY; ENDOSCOPY; GASTROENTEROLOGY; HUMAN; INTERNET; MEDICAL ASSESSMENT; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MULTICENTER STUDY; PRIORITY JOURNAL; QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; RELIABILITY; ULCERATIVE COLITIS; VIDEORECORDING;

EID: 32944461245     PISSN: 00165107     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.gie.2005.11.053     Document Type: Article

References (30)

1. M.M. Delvaux, M. Crespi, J.R. Armengol-Miro, F. Hagenmuller, and W. Teuffel The GASTER Project: building a computer network in digestive endoscopy: the experience of the European Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy. Gastrointestinal Endoscopy Application for Standards in Telecommunication, Education and Research J Clin Gastroenterol 29 1999 118 126
2. J.F. Rey, and R. Lambert ESGE recommendations for quality control in gastrointestinal endoscopy: guidelines for image documentation in upper and lower GI endoscopy Endoscopy 33 2001 901 903
3. J.A. Knottnerus The Evidence Base of Clinical Diagnosis 2002 BMJ Books London
4. C.C. Blackmore, M.L. Richardson, and K.F. Linnau Web-based image review and data acquisition for multi-institutional research AJR Am J Roentgenol 180 2003 1243 1246
5. A.G. Roseth, E. Aadland, J. Jahnsen, and N. Raknerud Assessment of disease activity in ulcerative colitis by faecal calprotectin, a novel granulocyte marker protein Digestion 58 1997 176 180
6. J.H. Baron, A.M. Connell, and J.E. Lennard-Jones Variation between observers in describing mucosal appearances in proctocolitis BMJ 1 1964 89 92
7. D.G. Altman Relation Between Two Continuous Variables: Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1st ed. 1991 Chapman and Hall London 277-321
8. T. de Lange, S. Larsen, and L. Aabakken Image documentation of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis: photographs or video clips? Gastrointest Endosc 61 2005 715 720
9. P. Armitage, and G. Berry Statistical Inference, Comparison of Two Proportions. Statistical Methods in Medical Research 2nd ed. 1987 Blackwell Oxford p. 93-140
10. A. Agresti Categorical Data Analysis 1990 Wiley New York
11. D.G. Altman Practical Statistics for Medical Research 1991 Chapman and Hall London
12. T. de Lange, S. Larsen, and L. Aabakken Inter-observer agreement in the assessment of endoscopic findings in ulcerative colitis BMC Gastroenterol 4 2004 May 18 9
13. J.A. Morris Information and observer disagreement in histopathology Histopathology 25 1994 123 128
14. S. Larsen, L. Aabakken, P.E. Lillevold, and M. Osnes Assessing soft data in clinical trials Pharm Med 5 1991 29 36
15. C.Y. Kim Compression of color medical images in gastrointestinal endoscopy: a review Medinfo 9 Pt 2 1998 1046 1050
16. B.S. Pritt, P.C. Gibson, and K. Cooper Digital imaging guidelines for pathology: a proposal for general and academic use Adv Anat Pathol 10 2003 96 100
17. A.M. Oakley Teledermatology in New Zealand J Cutan Med Surg 5 2001 111 116
18. R. Nowakowski, and G. Hammack Ophthalmic telemedicine at the Alabama Institute for Deaf and Blind Optometry 72 2001 8 12
19. M. Napoli, M. Nanni, S. Cimarra, L. Crisafulli, P. Campioni, and P. Marano Picture archiving and communication in radiology Rays 28 2003 73 81
20. R.L. Arenson, K.P. Andriole, D.E. Avrin, and R.G. Gould Computers in imaging and health care: now and in the future J Digit Imaging 13 2000 145 156
21. C.Y. Kim, B. Etemad, and T.F. Glenn Remote clinical assessment of gastrointestinal endoscopy (tele-endoscopy): an initial experience Proc AMIA Symp 2000 423 427
22. S.M. Wildi, C.Y. Kim, and T.F. Glenn Tele-endoscopy: a way to provide diagnostic quality for remote populations Gastrointest Endosc 59 2004 38 43
23. D.M. Siegel Resolution in digital imaging: enough already? Semin Cutan Med Surg 21 2002 209 215
24. A. Meining, T. Rosch, R. Kiesslich, M. Muders, F. Sax, and W. Heldwein Inter- and intra-observer variability of magnification chromoendoscopy for detecting specialized intestinal metaplasia at the gastroesophageal junction Endoscopy 36 2004 160 164
25. J.A. Cafazzo, J.J. Theal, I. Medad, and P.G. Rossos Digital video for the documentation of colonoscopy Gastrointest Endosc 60 2004 580 584
26. J.B. Marshall, and D.N. Brown Photodocumentation of total colonoscopy: how successful are endoscopists? do reviewers agree? Gastrointest Endosc 44 1996 243 248
27. D.K. Rex Still photography versus videotaping for documentation of cecal intubation: a prospective study Gastrointest Endosc 51 2000 451 459
28. T.H. Le, and N. Malhi Thin client (web browser)-based collaboration for medical imaging and web-enabled data J Digit Imaging 15 Suppl 1 2002 261 263
29. R. Lambert, M. Jeannerod, and J.F. Rey Eyes wide shut Endoscopy 36 2004 723 725
30. J.D. Kronz, M.A. Silberman, W.C. Allsbrook, and J.I. Epstein A web-based tutorial improves practicing pathologists' Gleason grading of images of prostate carcinoma specimens obtained by needle biopsy: validation of a new medical education paradigm Cancer 89 2000 1818 1823