Towards a Quantitative, Platform-Independent Analysis of Knowledge Systems

Principles of Knowledge Representation and Reasoning: Proceedings of the 9th International Conference, KR 2004

Volumn , Issue , 2004, Pages 507-514

  Friedland, Noah S ^a   Allen, Paul G ^a   Witbrock, Michael ^b   Matthews, Gavin ^b   Salay, Nancy ^b   Miraglia, Pierluigi ^b   Angele, Jurgen ^c   Staab, Steffen ^c   Israel, David ^d   Chaudhri, Vinay ^d   Porter, Bruce ^e   Barker, Ken ^e   Clark, Peter ^f  

^a VULCAN INC   (United States)

^b CYCORP INC   (United States)

^c Ontoprise GmbH   (Germany)

^d SRI INTERNATIONAL   (United States)

^e UNIVERSITY OF TEXAS AT AUSTIN   (United States)

^f BOEING COMPANY   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION;

FAILURE CHARACTERISTICS; FAILURE TYPES; INDEPENDENT ANALYSIS; KNOWLEDGE APPLICATION; KNOWLEDGE REPRESENTATION AND REASONING; KNOWLEDGE SYSTEM; PLATFORM INDEPENDENT; REASONING SYSTEM; STATE OF THE ART; SYSTEM FAILURES;

TAXONOMIES;

EID: 32944459924     PISSN: None     EISSN: None     Source Type: Conference Proceeding    
DOI: None     Document Type: Conference Paper

References (16)

1. Clark, P., et al., Knowledge Entry as the Graphical Assembly of Components, in Proc 1st Int Conf on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap'01). 2001. p. 22-29.
2. Clark, P. and B. Porter, KM - The Knowledge Machine: Users Manual. 1999.
3. Barker, K., B. Porter, and P. Clark, A Library of Generic Concepts for Composing Knowledge Bases, in Proc. 1st Int Conf on Knowledge Capture (K-Cap'01). 2001. p. 14-21.
4. Guha, R.V. and D.B. Lenat, Cyc: A Mid-term report. AI Magazine, 1990. 11(3).
5. Angele, J., Operationalisierung des Modells der Expertise mit KARL., 1993, DISKI, Infix Verlag.
6. Decker, S., et al., eds. Ontobroker: Ontology-based Access to Distributed and Semi-Structured Information. Database Semantics: Semantic Issues in Multi-media Systems, ed. R. Meersmann. 1999, Kluwer Academics.
7. Kifer, M., G. Lausen, and J. Wu, Logical Foundations of Object Oriented and Frame Based Languages. Journal of the ACM, 1995. 42: p. 741-843.
8. Levesque, H.J. and R.J. Brachman, Expressiveness and Tractability in Knowledge Representation and Reasoning. Computational Intelligence, 1987. 3(2): p. 78-93.
9. Davis, R. and J. King, The Origin of Rule-based Systems in AI, in Rule-Based Expert Systems: The Mycin Experiments of the Stanford Heuristic Programming Project, B.G. Buchanon and E.H. Shortliffe, Editors. 1984, Addison-Wesley: Reading, MA. 10. Lenat, D.B. and R.V. Guha, Building Large Knowledge-Based Systems: Representation and Inference in the CYC Project. 1990: p. 336.
10. Young, M. and R.N. Taylor. Rehinking the Taxonomy of Falult Detection Techniques. in 11th International Conference on Software Engineering. 1989. Pittsburgh.
11. Perry, D.E., An Empirical Study of Software Interface Faults, 1985, AT&T Bell Laboratories: Murray Hill.
12. Brachman, R.J., et al., Reducing CLASSIC to ``Practice'': Knowledge Representation Theory Meets Reality. Artificial Intelligence Journal, 1999. 114: p. 203-237.
13. Keyes, J., Why Expert Systems Fail? IEEE Expert, 1989. 4: p. 50-53.
14. Batanov, D. and P. Brezillon, eds. First International Conference on Successes and Failures of Knowledge-based Systems in Real World Applications. 1996, Asian Institute of Technology: Bangkok, Thailand.
15. Cohen, P., et al., The DARPA High Performance Knowledge Bases Project. AI Magazine, 1998. 19(4): p. 25-49.
16. Cohen, P., et al., Does Prior Knowledge Facilitate the Development of Knowledge-based Systems, in Proceedings of the AAAI-99. 1999. p. 221-226.