Top 10 tips for successful qualitative grantsmanship

Research in Nursing and Health

Volumn 28, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 441-443

  Knafl, Kathleen A ^a   Deatrick, Janet A ^b  

^a OREGON HEALTH AND SCIENCE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL OF NURSING   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EDITORIAL; FINANCIAL MANAGEMENT; HUMAN; NURSING RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; UNITED STATES;

HUMANS; NURSING RESEARCH; QUALITATIVE RESEARCH; RESEARCH SUPPORT; UNITED STATES;

EID: 32944457642     PISSN: 01606891     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/nur.20099     Document Type: Editorial

References (6)

1. Grey, M. (2000). Editorial. Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 91-92.
2. Morse, J. (1994). Going in 'blind.' Qualitative Health Research, 4, 3-5.
3. Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative research and evaluation methods (3rd ed.). Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
4. Sandelowski, M. (2000). Whatever happened to qualitative description? Research in Nursing & Health, 23, 334-340.
5. Sandelowski, M., Davis, D., & Harris, B. (1989). Artful design: Writing the proposal for research in the naturalistic paradigm. Research in Nursing & Health, 12, 77-84.
6. Thorne, S., Kirkham, S., & MacDonald-Emes, J. (1997). Interpretive description: A non-categorical qualitative alternative for developing nursing knowledge. Research in Nursing & Health, 20, 169-177.