What future for the global environment facility?

Journal of Environment and Development

Volumn 15, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 50-74

  Clémençon, Raymond ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Environment; Funding; Global Environment Facility; Resources

Indexed keywords

DEVELOPING WORLD; ENVIRONMENTAL POLICY; GLOBAL ENVIRONMENT FACILITY; INTERNATIONAL AGREEMENT;

EID: 32944455544     PISSN: 10704965     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/1070496506286438     Document Type: Article

References (55)

1. Executive Office of the President. (2005, June 28,) Statement of administration policy. Retrieved on March 15, 2005, from http://www.whitehouse.gov/omb/legislative/sap/109-1/hr3057sap-h.pdf
2. Addison, T., McGillivray, M., and Odedokun, M. (2003). Donor funding of multilateral aid agencies. Determining factors and revealed burden sharing. Discussion Paper No. 2003/17. United Nations University.
3. BBC News. (2005, May 15). EU ministers agree on tax on flying. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/ 4545123.stm
4. Bouton, M., and Page, B. (2002). American public opinion-foreign policy. Worldviews 2002, pp. 1 - 76. Chicago: Chicago Council on Foreign Relations.
5. Chatterjee, P., and Finger, M. (1994). The earth brokers. New York: Routledge.
6. Clémençon, R. (1994, August). The evolution of the global environment facility: The right institution for the wrong reasons. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.
7. Clémençon, R. (2000, July). Green planet contribution. (GEF working paper, 17, July 2000). Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from www.gefweb.org/Outreach/outreach-publications/ WP17-Financing_protection.pdf
8. Clémençon, R. (forthcoming a). Costs and benefits of global environmental public goods provision. Stockholm, Sweden: International Task Force on Global Public Goods. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from www.gpgtaskforce.org/show_file.aspx?file_id=122
9. Clémençon, R. (forthcoming b). Resource needs and availability for protecting global environmental public goods. Stockholm, Sweden: International Task Force on Global Public Goods. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from www.gpgtaskforce.org/ show_file.aspx?file_id=121
10. Dublin, H., Volonte, C., and Brann, J. (2004). GEF biodiversity program study. September 2004. Washington, DC: Monitoring and Evaluation Unit, Global Environment Facility Secretariat.
11. Eurobarometer. (2002). The attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Eurobarometer, 58. Brussels: The European Opinion Research Group.
12. Eurobarometer. (2005, April). The attitudes of European citizens towards the environment. Special Eurobarometer, 217/Wave 62.1 - TNS Opinion-Social. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from http://europa.eu.int/comm/environment/barometer/ report_ebenv_2005_04_22_en.pdf
13. European Union Press Releases. (2005, December 12). Council adoption of the EU Strategy for Africa marks new era in Euro-African relations. Retrieved on December 14, 2005, from europa.eu.int/press_room
14. Eberhard, A., Tokle, S. E., Viggh, A., Del Monaco, A., Winkler, H., and Danyo, S. (2004). GEF climate change program study: Monitoring and Evaluation Unit. Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility Secretariat.
15. Gerlak, A. (2004). The Global Environment Facility and transboundary water resource management: New institutional arrangements in the Danube River and Black Sea region. Jounrnal of Environment and Development, 13, 400 - 424.
16. Global Environment Facility. (1993). GEF replenishment paper: Financing needs for GEF II (GEF/RE.93/1, May 1993). Washington, DC: Author.
17. Global Environment Facility. (2001a). Meeting on the third replenishment of the GEF trust fund, May 7, 2001, Agenda Item 2, GEF2 pledges and funding situation (GEF/R.3/4/Rev.1. May 4, 2001: P. 1). Washington, DC: Author.
18. Global Environment Facility. (2001b). Summary of negotiations on the third replenishment of the GEF trust fund, annex C, para. 16 (GEF/C.20/ 4). Washington, DC: Author.
19. Global Environment Facility. (2003). Second overall performance study. Washington, DC: Author.
20. Global Environment Facility. (2004a). Annual report 2004. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from http://www.gefweb.org/Documents/ AnnualReport_2004.pdf
21. Global Environment Facility. (2004b). Instrument for the establishment of the restructured global environment facility. Washington, DC: Author. Retrieved on November 1, 2005, from www.thegef.org/GEF_Instrument3.pdf
22. Global Environment Facility. (2005a). Chair's summary of special meeting of the GEF Council, August 31, 2005. Annex A. Washington, DC: Author.
23. Global Environment Facility. (2005b). Report on the funding status of the GEF trust fund as of September 30, 2005 (GEF/R.4/13, September 30, 2005). Washington, DC: Author.
24. Global Environment Facility. (2005c). Secretariat note on work program submitted for GEF Council approval (GEF/C.25/6, May 2, 2005). Washington, DC: Author.
25. Global Environment Facility. (2005d). Technical paper on the GEF Resource Allocation Framework. (GEF/C.26/2/Rev.1, August 24, 2005). Washington, DC: Author.
26. Global Environment Facility. (2005e). Third overall performance study of the Global Environment Facility. Washington, DC: ICF Consulting.
27. Global Environment Facility News Release. (2005). Council adopts major reform program, September 2, 2005. Washington, DC: Author.
28. Guber, D. L. (2003). The grassroots of green revolution: Polling America on the environment. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
29. Hale, T., and Mauzerall, D. (2004). Thinking globally and acting locally: Can the Johannesburg partnerships coordinate action on sustainable development? Journal of Environment and Development, 13, 220 - 239.
30. Hannigan, J. A. (1995). Environmental sociology: A social constructionist perspective. New York: Routledge.
31. Hardin, R. (1982). Collective action. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
32. Hook, S. W. (2003). Domestic obstacles to international affairs: The state department underfire at home. PS: Political Science-Politics, 36, 23 - 29.
33. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, United Nations Environment Program, and World Meteorological Organization. (2001). Third assessment report, Working group̈III: Mitigation. Geneva: World Meteorological Organization. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from www.ipcc.ch
34. Koch-Weser, M. R. V. B. (2002). Sustaining global environmental governance: Innovation in environment and development finance. In D. Esty - M. Ivanova (Eds.), Global environmental governance (pp. 1 - 23). New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
35. Krull, S. (1996). American and foreign aid: A study of American public attitudes. College Park, MD: University of Maryland Press.
36. Lakoff, G. (2004). Don't think of an elephant! Know your values and frame the debate. White River Junction, VT: Chelsea Green.
37. Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and Human Well-Being. Five-volume set. New York: Island Press.
38. Najam, A. (2004). The view from the South. In D. Axelrod - N. Vig (Eds.), The global environment: Institutions, law and policy (pp. 225 - 243). Washington, DC: Congressional Quarterly.
39. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs. (2000). Taken for granted: An evaluation of Norway's special grant for the environment. Evaluation Report, 10, 1 - 112.
40. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (1995). Environmental taxes in OECD countries. Paris: Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development.
41. Olson, M. (1965). The logic of collective action. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
42. Porter, G., Clémençon, R., Ofosu-Amaah, W., and Philips, M. (1998). Study of the GEF's overall performance. Washington, DC: Global Environment Facility.
43. Pagiola, S., Bishop, J., and Landell-Mills, N. (2002). Selling forest environmental services. Sterling, VA: Earthscan.
44. Pierson, P. (2000). Increasing returns, path dependence, and the study of politics. American Political Science Review, 94, 251 - 267.
45. Reed, D. (1993). The Global Environment Facility. Sharing responsibility for the biosphere. WWF International Institutions Policy Program. Washington, DC: World Wildlife Fund for Nature.
46. Sachs, J. (2005, June 12). Africa's suffering is Bush's shame - Millions are dying because of American policy. Los Angeles Times, p. 23.
47. Schipper, E. Lisa F., and Boyd, Emily. (2006). UNFCCC COP11 and COP/MOP 1: At Last, Some Hope? The Journal of Environmental-Development, 15, 75 - 90.
48. Sjöberg, H. (1994). From idea to reality: The creation of the global environment facility. (Global Environment Facility Working Paper No. 10). Retrieved on November 1, 2005, from www.gefweb.org/Outreach/ outreach-publications/WP10.pdf
49. Sjöberg, H. (1999). Restructuring the global environment facility. (Global Environment Facility Working Paper No. 13). Retrieved on November 1, 2005, from www.gefweb.org/Outreach/outreach-publications/ WP13-Restructuring_the_GEF.pdf
50. Stevenson, R. W. (2005, July 9). 8 leaders hail steps on Africa and warming. New York Times.
51. Ten Kate, T., and Laird, S. A. (2000). Biodiversity and business: Coming to terms with the grand bargain. International Affairs, 76, 241 - 264.
52. UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. (2004). Range and effectiveness of capacity-building activities in developing countries aimed at implementing decision 2/CP.7. Technical Paper (FCCC/TP/2004/1. 14 ÿJune 2004). Bonn, Germany: Author.
53. U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. (2005). Inflation calculator. Retrieved on December 6, 2005, from http://data.bls.gov/cgi-bin/cpicalc.pl
54. Wapner, P. (1996). Environmental activism and world politics. New York: State University of New York Press.
55. World Bank. (2005). Governance matters IV: Governance Indicators for 1996-2004. Retrieved on December 22, 2005, from www.worldbank.org/wbi/ governance/pubs/govmatters4.html