Cone opsin mislocalization in Rpe65-/- mice: A defect that can be corrected by 11-cis retinal

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 46, Issue 10, 2005, Pages 3876-3882

  Rohrer, Baerbel ^a   Lohr, Heather R ^a   Humphries, Peter ^b   Redmond, T Michael ^c   Seeliger, Mathias W ^d   Crouch, Rosalie K ^a  

^a MEDICAL UNIVERSITY OF SOUTH CAROLINA   (United States)

^b TRINITY COLLEGE DUBLIN   (Ireland)

^c NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

^d UNIVERSITY OF TÜBINGEN   (Germany)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

11 CIS RETINAL; MESSENGER RNA; OPSIN; CARRIER PROTEIN; EYE PROTEIN; RETINAL; RHODOPSIN; RPE65 PROTEIN, BOS TAURUS; RPE65 PROTEIN, MOUSE;

ANIMAL EXPERIMENT; ANIMAL MODEL; ANIMAL TISSUE; ARTICLE; CONTROLLED STUDY; ELECTRORETINOGRAM; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MOUSE; NONHUMAN; NUCLEOTIDE SEQUENCE; PHOTORECEPTOR; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROTEIN LOCALIZATION; REAL TIME POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RETINA CONE; RETINA DEGENERATION; RETINA DISEASE; RETINA ROD; ANIMAL; C57BL MOUSE; CELL SURVIVAL; CONFOCAL MICROSCOPY; DRUG EFFECT; ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; GENETICS; METABOLISM; MOUSE MUTANT; PATHOPHYSIOLOGY; PHOTOSTIMULATION; PHYSIOLOGY; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTION POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; TRANSPORT AT THE CELLULAR LEVEL;

ANIMALS; BIOLOGICAL TRANSPORT; CARRIER PROTEINS; CELL SURVIVAL; CONES (RETINA); ELECTRORETINOGRAPHY; EYE PROTEINS; IMMUNOHISTOCHEMISTRY; MICE; MICE, INBRED C57BL; MICE, KNOCKOUT; MICROSCOPY, CONFOCAL; OPSIN; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINAL DEGENERATION; RETINALDEHYDE; REVERSE TRANSCRIPTASE POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION; RHODOPSIN; RNA, MESSENGER;

EID: 32944455040     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.05-0533     Document Type: Article

References (39)

1. Redmond TM, Yu S, Lee E, et al. Rpe65 is necessary for production of 11-cis-vitamin A in the retinal visual cycle. Nat Genet. 1998;20:344-351.
2. Znoiko SL, Crouch RK, Moiseyev G, et al. Identification of the RPE65 protein in mammalian cone photoreceptors. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2002;43:1604-1609.
3. Thumann G, Kociok N, Bartz-Schmidt KU, et al. Detection of mRNA for proteins involved in retinol metabolism in iris pigment epithelium. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 1999;237:1046-1051.
4. Van Hooser JP, Aleman TS, He YG, et al. Rapid restoration of visual pigment and function with oral retinoid in a mouse model of childhood blindness. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2000;97:8623-8628.
5. -/- mice during development and aging. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2003;44:310-315.
6. Woodruff ML, Wang Z, Chung HY, et al. Spontaneous activity of opsin apoprotein is a cause of Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Nat Genet. 2003;35:158-164.
7. Ablonczy Z, Crouch R, Goletz P, et al. 11-cis-Retinal reduces constitutive opsin phosphorylation and improves quantum catch in retinoid-deficient mouse rod photoreceptors. J Biol Chem. 2002;277:40491-40498.
8. -/- knockout mouse eye results in limited rescue. Genet Vaccines Ther. 2004; 2:3.
9. -/- mouse at early ages. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:1473-1479.
10. Curcio CA. Photoreceptor topography in ageing and age-related maculopathy. Eye. 2001;15:376-383.
11. Cremers FP, van den Hurk JA, den Hollander AI. Molecular genetics of Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Hum Mol Genet. 2002;11:1169-1176.
12. Bennett J. Gene therapy for retinitis pigmentosa. Curr Opin Mol Ther. 2000;2:420-425.
13. -/- dogs produces long-term visual improvement. J Hered. 2003;94:31-37.
14. Fan J, Rohrer B, Moiseyev G, et al. Isorhodopsin rather than rhodopsin mediates rod function in Rpe65 knock-out mice. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 2003;100:13662-13667.
15. Seeliger MW, Grimm C, Stahlberg F, et al. New views on Rpe65 deficiency: the rod system is the source of vision in a mouse model of Leber Congenital Amaurosis. Nat Genet. 2001;29:70-74.
16. Jaissle GB, May CA, Reinhard J, et al. Evaluation of the rhodopsin knockout mouse as a model of pure cone function. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2001;42:506-513.
17. Rohrer B, Korenbrot JI, LaVail MM, et al. Role of neurotrophin receptor TrkB in the maturation of rod photoreceptors and establishment of synaptic transmission to the inner retina. J Neurosci. 1999;19:8919-8930.
18. Lyubarsky AL, Falsini B, Pennesi ME, et al. UV- and midwave-sensitive cone-driven retinal responses of the mouse: a possible phenotype for coexpression of cone photopigments. J Neurosci. 1999;19:442-455.
19. Gresh J, Goletz PW, Crouch RK, et al. Structure-function analysis of rods and cones in juvenile, adult, and aged C57BL/6 and Balb/c mice. Vis Neurosci. 2003;20:211-220.
20. Wilder KC, Szel A, Jacobsen AL. Positional information and opsin identity in retinal cones. J Comp Neurol. 1996;374:96-107.
21. Jeon CJ, Strettoi E, Masland RH. The major cell populations of the mouse retina. J Neurosci. 1998;18:8936-8946.
22. Applebury ML, Antoch MP, Baxter LC, et al. The murine cone photoreceptor: a single cone type expresses both S and M opsins with retinal spatial patterning. Neuron. 2000;27:513-523.
23. Krishna VR, Alexander KR, Peachey NS. Temporal properties of the mouse cone electroretinogram. J Neurophysiol. 2002;87:42-48.
24. Cornwall MC, Fain GL. Bleached pigment activates transduction in isolated rods of the salamander retina. J Physiol. 1994;480:261-279.
25. Buczylko J, Saari JC, Crouch RK, et al. Mechanisms of opsin activation. J Biol Chem. 1996;271:20621-20630.
26. Melia TJ Jr, Cowan CW, Angleson JK, et al. A comparison of the efficiency of G-protein activation by ligand-free and light-activated forms of rhodopsin. Biophys J. 1997;73:3182-3191.
27. Mohand-Said S, Deudon-Combe A, Hicks D, et al. Normal retina releases a diffusible factor stimulating cone survival in the retinal degeneration mouse. Proc Nat Acad Sci USA. 1998;95:8357-8362.
28. Leveillard T, Mohand-Said S, Lorentz O, et al. Identification and characterization of rod-derived cone viability factor. Nat Genet. 2004;36:755-759.
29. Chapple JP, Grayson C, Hardcastle AJ, et al. Unfolding retinal dystrophies: a role for molecular chaperones? Trends Mol Med. 2001;7:414-421.
30. Saliba RS, Munro PM, Luthert PJ, et al. The cellular fate of mutant rhodopsin: quality control, degradation and aggresome formation. J Cell Sci. 2002;115:2907-2918.
31. Noorwez SM, Malhotra R, McDowell JH, et al. Retinoids assist the cellular folding of the autosomal dominant retinitis pigmentosa opsin mutant P23H. J Biol Chem. 2004;279:16278-16284.
32. Ostrer H, Pullarkat RK, Kazmi MA. Glycosylation and palmitoylation are not required for the formation of the X-linked cone opsin visual pigments. Mol Vis. 1998;4:28.
33. Goldberg AL. Protein degradation and protection against misfolded or damaged proteins. Nature. 2003;426:895-899.
34. Kopito RR, Sitia R. Aggresomes and Russell bodies: symptoms of cellular indigestion? EMBO Rep. 2000;1:225-231.
35. Garcia-Mata R, Bebok Z, Sorscher EJ, et al. Characterization and dynamics of aggresome formation by a cytosolic GFP-chimera. J Cell Biol. 1999;146:1239-1254.
36. Ganea E. Chaperone-like activity of alpha-crystallin and other small heat shock proteins. Curr Protein Pept Sci. 2001;2:205-225.
37. Sakaguchi H, Miyagi M, Darrow RM, et al. Intense light exposure changes the crystallin content in retina. Exp Eye Res. 2003;76:131-133.
38. Mata N, Radu R, Clemmons R, et al. Isomerization and oxidation of vitamin a in cone-dominant retinas: a novel pathway for visual-pigment regeneration in daylight. Neuron. 2002;36:69-80.
39. Jin J, Jones GJ, Cornwall MC. Movement of retinal along cone and rod photoreceptors. Vis Neurosci. 1994;11:389-399.