Double target comparison of blood-side methods for measuring the hemodialysis dose

Kidney International

Volumn 68, Issue 6, 2005, Pages 2863-2876

  Prado, Manuel ^a   Roa, Laura M ^b   Palma, Alfonso ^b   Milán, José A ^b  

^a UNIVERSIDAD DE SEVILLA   (Spain)

^b NONE

Author keywords

Blood side measuring methods; Comparative analysis; Dialysis dose measurement sensitivity; Dialysis system kt v; Equilibrated kt v; Hemodialysis dose; Urea kinetic modelling

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; ARTIFICIAL KIDNEY; BLOOD; CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIAL; CONTROLLED STUDY; DOSE CALCULATION; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS; HEMODIALYSIS PATIENT; HUMAN; HYPOTHESIS; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; KIDNEY FAILURE; MAJOR CLINICAL STUDY; MATHEMATICAL COMPUTING; MEASUREMENT; OUTCOMES RESEARCH; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIAL; REVIEW;

EID: 32844474944     PISSN: 00852538     EISSN: 15231755     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1523-1755.2005.00760.x     Document Type: Article

References (69)

1. LOWRIE EG, LAIRD NM, PARKER TF, SARGENT JA: Effect of the hemodialysis prescription of patient morbidity: Report from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. N Engl J Med 305:1176-1181, 1981
2. LOWRIE EG, LAIRD NM: The National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int Suppl:S1-122, 1983
3. GOTCH FA, SARGENT JA: A mechanistic analysis of the National Cooperative Dialysis Study (NCDS). Kidney Int 28:526-534, 1985
4. LOWRIE EG: The normalized treatment ratio (Kt/V) is not the best dialysis dose parameter. Blood Purif 18:286-294, 2000
5. CHARRA B, DEPNER TA, VANHOLDER R, et al: Is Kt/V urea a satisfactory measure for dosing the newer dialysis regimens? Semin Dial 14:8-9, 2001
6. KEEN M, SCHULMAN G: Current standards for dialysis adequacy. Adv Ren Replace Ther 2:287-294, 1995
7. LOCATELLI F, ANDRULLI S, D'AMICO M: Evaluation of dialysis outcomes: Experimental versus observational evidence. J Nephrol 14(Suppl 4):S101-108, 2001
8. EKNOYAN G, BECK GJ, CHEUNG AK, et al: Effect of dialysis dose and membrane flux in maintenance hemodialysis. N Engl J Med 347:2010-2019, 2002
9. ROA LM, PRADO M: The role of urea kinetic modelling in assessing the adequacy of dialysis. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 32:461-539, 2004
10. GOTCH FA, SARGENT JA, KEEN ML: Whither goest Kt/V? Kidney Int 58:S3-S18, 2000
11. NATIONAL KIDNEY FOUNDATION: NKF-K/DOQI Clinical Practice Guidelines for Hemodialysis Adequacy: Update 2000. Am J Kidney Dis 37:S7-S64, 2001
12. DAUGIRDAS JT: Second generation logarithmic estimates of single-pool variable volume Kt/V: An analysis of error. J Am Soc Nephrol 4:1205-1213, 1993
13. COVIC A, GOLDSMITH DJ, HILL K, et al: Urea kinetic modelling-are any of the 'bedside' Kt/V formulae reliable enough? Nephrol Dial Transplant 13:3138-3146, 1998
14. GOLDSTEIN SL, SOROF JM, BREWER ED: Natural logarithmic estimates of Kt/V in the pediatric hemodialysis population. Am J Kidney Dis 33:518-522, 1999
15. CANAUD B, BOSC JY, CABROL L, et al: Urea as a marker of adequacy in hemodialysis: Lesson from in vivo urea dynamics monitoring. Kidney Int 58(Suppl 76):S28-40, 2000
16. ZIÓLKO M, PIETRZYK JA, GRABSKA-CHRZASTOWSKA J: Accuracy of hemodialysis modeling. Kidney Int 57:1152-1163, 2000
17. DEPNER TA: Assessing adequacy of hemodialysis: Urea modeling. Kidney Int 45:1522-1535, 1994
18. ELLIS PW, MALCHESKY PS, MAGNUSSON MO, et al: Comparison of two methods of kinetic modeling. Trans Am Soc Artif Intern Organs 30:60-64, 1984
19. FELLAY G, GABRIEL JP: A comparative approach to models of urea kinetics in hemodialysis treatment. Nephrologie 9:233-236, 1988
20. RAJ DS, TOBE S, SAIPHOO C, MANUEL MA: Quantitating dialysis using two dialysate samples: A simple, practical and accurate approach for evaluating urea kinetics. Int J Artif Organs 20:422-427, 1997
21. ARGILES A, FICHEUX A, THOMAS M, et al: Precise quantification of dialysis using continuous sampling of spent dialysate and total dialysate volume measurement. Kidney Int 52:530-537, 1997
22. BOSTICARDO G, ALLOATTI S: Agreement between the classical urea kinetic model and direct dialysis quantification: Importance of urea rebound. Nephron 74:674-679, 1996
23. SMYE SW, DUNDERDALE E, BROWNRIDGE G, WILL E: Estimation of treatment dose in high-efficiency haemodialysis. Nephron 67:24-29, 1994
24. SMYE SW, EVANS JHC, WILL EJ, BROCKLEBANK JT: Paediatric haemodialysis: Estimation of treatment efficiency in the presence of urea rebound. Clin Phys Physiol Meas 13:51-62, 1992
25. BHASKARAN S, TOBE S, SAIPHOO C, et al: Blood urea levels 30 minutes before the end of dialysis are equivalent to equilibrated blood urea. ASAIO J 43:M759-762, 1997
26. MADUELL F, GARCIA-VALDECASAS J, GARCIA H, et al: Urea reduction ratio considering urea rebound. Nephron 78:143-147, 1998
27. DAUGIRDAS JT, SCHNEDITZ D: Overestimation of hemodialysis dose depends on dialysis efficiency by regional blood flow but not by conventional two pool urea kinetic analysis. ASAIO J 41:M719-724, 1995
28. MADUELL F, GARCÍA H, HERNÁNDEZ-JARAS J, et al: Valoración de métodos para el cálculo del Kt/V corregido para el rebote [Assessment of methods for calculation of Kt/V corrected to account for rebound]. Nefrología XVII:55-61, 1997
29. TATTERSALL J, DETAKATS D, CHAMNEY P, et al: The post-hemodialysis rebound: Predicting and quantifying its effect on Kt/V. Kidney Int 50:2094-2102, 1996
30. DAUGIRDAS JT, BLAKE PG, ING TS: Handbook of Dialysis, 3rd ed., Philadelphia, Lippincot Williams & Wilkins, 2001
31. PRADO M, ROA L, PALMA A, MILÁN JA: A novel mathematical method based on urea kinetic modelling for computing the dialysis dose. Computer methods and programs in biomedicine 74:109-128, 2004
32. PRADO M, ROA L, PALMA A, MILÁN JA: Urea kinetic modelling: Hemodialysis prescription procedure and membrane material, in IFMBE IX Mediterr Conf on Med and Biol Eng and Comp (vol 2), Pula, Croatia, 2001, pp 947-950
33. HESTER RL, CURRY E, BOWER J: The determination of hemodialysis blood recirculation using blood urea nitrogen measurements. Am J Kidney Dis 20:598-602, 1992
34. CHUMLEA WC, GUO SS, ZELLER CM, et al: Total body water reference values and prediction equations for adults. Kidney Int 59:2250-2258, 2001
35. CHERTOW GM, LAZARUS JM, LEW NL, et al: Development of a population-specific regression equation to estimate total body water in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 51:1578-1582, 1997
36. MILUTINOVIC J, CUTLER RE, HOOVER P, et al: Measurement of residual glomerular filtration rate in the patient receiving repetitive hemodialysis. Kidney Int 8:185-190, 1975
37. GOTCH FA: The current place of urea kinetic modelling with respect to different dialysis modalities. Nephrol Dial Transplant 13(Suppl 6):10-14, 1998
38. WATSON PE, WATSON ID, BATT RD: Total body water volumes for adult males and females estimated from simple anthropometric measurements. J Clin Nutr 33:27-39, 1980
39. BANKHEAD MM, TOTO RD, STAR RA: Accuracy of urea removal estimated by kinetic models. Kidney Int 48:785-793, 1995
40. MOVILLI E: Simpified approaches to calculate Kt/V. It's time for agreement. Nephrol Dial Transplant 11:24-27, 1996
41. SARGENT J, GOTCH F: Mathematic modeling of dialysis therapy. Kidney Int (Suppl 10):S2-10, 1980
42. PRADO M, ROA L, PALMA A, MILÁN JA: Kinetic indices and dialysis outcomes, in Proceedings of the 25th Annual International Conference of the IEEE (vol 3), Cancun, Mexico, 2003, pp 2746-2749
43. CASTRO MC, ROMAO JE, MARCONDES M: Measurement of blood urea concentration during haemodialysis is not an accurate method to determine equilibrated post-dialysis urea concentration. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:1814-1817, 2001
44. FERNANDEZ EA, VALTUILLE R, WILLSHAW P, PERAZZO CA: Using artificial intelligence to predict the equilibrated postdialysis blood urea concentration. Blood Purif 19:271-285, 2001
45. MARSENIC O, PECO-ANTIC A, JOVANOVIC O: Comparison of two methods for predicting equilibrated Kt/V (eKt/V) using true eKt/V value. Pediatr Nephrol 13:418-422, 1999
46. DAUGIRDAS JT, DEPNER TA, GOTCH FA, et al: Comparison of methods to predict equilibrated Kt/V in the HEMO Pilot Study. Kidney Int 52:1395-1405, 1997
47. SMYE SW, TATTERSALL JE, WILL EJ: Modeling the postdialysis rebound: The reconciliation of current formulas. ASAIO J 45:562-567, 1999
48. BLAND JM, ALTMAN DG: Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet 1:307-310, 1986
49. DEPNER T, BECK G, DAUGIRDAS J, et al: Lessons from the Hemodialysis (HEMO) study: An improved measure of the actual hemodialysis dose. Am J Kidney Dis 33:142-149, 1999
50. CAPPELLO A, GRANDI F, LAMBERTI C, SANTORO A: Comparative evaluation of different methods to estimate urea distribution volume and generation rate. Int J Artif Organs 17:322-330, 1994
51. DE FIJTER WM, DE FIJTER CW, OE PL, et al: Assessment of total body water and lean body mass from anthropometry. Watson formula, creatinine kinetics, and body electrical impedance compared with antipyrine kinetics in peritoneal dialysis patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant 12:151-156, 1997
52. KLOPPENBURG WD, STEGEMAN CA, DE JONG PE, HUISMAN RM: Anthropometry-based equations overestimate the urea distribution volume in hemodialysis patients. Kidney Int 59:1165-1174, 2001
53. LEE SW, SONG JH, KIM GA, et al: Assessment of total body water from anthropometry-based equations using bioelectrical impedance as reference in Korean adult control and haemodialysis subjects. Nephrol Dial Transplant 16:91-97, 2001
54. BERROZPE JD, LANAO JM, DELFINA JMP: Biofarmacia y Farmacocinética (Biopharmacy and Pharmacokinetic), (Vol 1), 1st ed., Madrid, Spain, Editorial Sintesis, 1997, pp 446
55. DAUGIRDAS J, GREENE T, DEPNER T, et al: Anthropometrically estimated total body water volumes are larger than modeled urea volume in chronic hemodialysis patients: Effects of age, race, and gender. Kidney Int 64:1108-1119, 2003
56. HIMMELFARB J, EVANSON J, HAKIM RM, et al: Urea volume of distribution exceeds total body water in patients with acute renal failure. Kidney Int 61:317-323, 2002
57. BOSTICARDO GM, AVALLE U, SERRA A, et al: Proposal of new formulas for three-point urea kinetics, compared with traditional kinetics and direct dialysis quantification. Minerva Urol Nefrol 48:59-66, 1996
58. DAUGIRDAS JT, SMYE SW: Effect of a two compartment distribution on apparent urea distribution volume. Kidney Int 51:1270-1273, 1997
59. DAUGIRDAS J, SCHNEDITZ D, LEEHEY D: Effect of access recirculation on the modeled urea distribution volume. Am J Kidney Dis 27:512-518, 1996
60. VANHOLDER R, BURGELMAN M, DE SMET R, et al: Two-pool versus single-pool models in the determination of urea kinetic parameters. Blood Purif 14:437-450, 1996
61. DEPNER TA, CHEER A: Modeling urea kinetics with two vs. three BUN measurements. ASAIO J 135:499-502, 1989
62. LOWRIE EG, TEEHAN BP: Principles of prescribing dialysis therapy: Implementing recommendations from the National Cooperative Dialysis Study. Kidney Int Suppl 13:S113-122, 1983
63. JINDAL KK, MANUEL A, GOLDSTEIN MB: Percent reduction in blood urea concentration during hemodialysis (PRU). A simple and accurate method to estimate Kt/V urea. ASAIO Trans 33:286-288, 1987
64. BARTH R: Direct calculation of KT/V. A simplified approach to monitoring of hemodialysis. Nephron 50:191-195, 1988
65. CALZAVARA P, VIANELLO A, DA PORTO A, et al: Comparison between three mathematical models of KT/V. Int J Artif Organs 11:107-110, 1988
66. KESHAVIAH P, HANSON G, BERKSETH R, COLLINS A: A simplified approach to monitoring in vivo therapy prescription. ASAIO Trans 34:620-622, 1988
67. BASILE C, CASINO F, LOPEZ T: Percent reduction in blood urea concentration during dialysis estimates Kt/V in a simple and accurate way. Am J Kidney Dis 15:40-45, 1990
68. IJELY GK, RAJA RM: Simplified calculation of per and Kt/V, in 24th Annual JASN Meeting, 1991, pp 329
69. KERR P, ARGILES A, CANAUD B, et al: Accuracy of Kt/V estimations in high-flux haemodiafiltration using per cent reduction of urea: Incorporation of urea rebound. Nephrol Dial Transplant 8:149-153, 1993