Energy use pattern analyses of greenhouse vegetable production

Energy

Volumn 31, Issue 8-9, 2006, Pages 1243-1256

  Canakci, M ^a   Akinci, I ^a  

^a AKDENIZ UNIVERSITY   (Turkey)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CROPS; DATA ACQUISITION; ENERGY RESOURCES; POLYNOMIALS; VEGETATION;

CROP PLANNING; GREENHOUSE VEGETABLE PRODUCTION; OUTPUT-INPUT RATIO; TOTAL ENERGY INPUTS;

GREENHOUSE EFFECT;

CROPS; DATA ACQUISITION; ENERGY RESOURCES; GREENHOUSE EFFECT; POLYNOMIALS; VEGETATION;

CROP PRODUCTION; ENERGY USE; VEGETABLE;

CULTIVATION; DATA PROCESSING; ENERGY;

ANTALYA [TURKEY]; EURASIA; TURKEY;

CUCUMIS SATIVUS; LYCOPERSICON ESCULENTUM; SOLANUM MELONGENA;

EID: 32844470056     PISSN: 03605442     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2005.05.021     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. E.J. Hetz Energy utilization in Chilean agriculture Agric Mech Asia Africa Latin America (AMA) 23 2 1992 52 56
2. C.J.S. Pannu, S. Singh, M.D. Singh, and S. Singh Energy use pattern for a selected village in the cotton-belt of Punjab Energy 18 11 1993 1113 1117
3. Triolo L, Unmole H, Mariani A, Tomarchio L. Energy analyses of agriculture: the Italian case study and general situation in developing countries. In: Third international symposium on mechanization and energy in agriculture, İzmir-Turkey; 1987. p. 172-84.
4. P.K. Mohapatra, D. Satpathy, and P.C. Senapati Energy studies in cropping systems in lateric soil of Orissa, India Agri Mech Asia Africa Latin America (AMA) 22 1 1991 49 52 see also p. 58
5. Yaldiz O, Ozturk HH, Zeren Y, Bascetincelik A. Energy usage in production of field crops in Turkey. 5. In: International congress on mechanization and energy in agriculture, İzmir-Turkey; 1993. p. 527-36 (in Turkish).
6. S. Singh, S. Singh, C.J. Pannu, and J. Singh Energy input and yield relations for wheat in different agro-climatic zones of the Punjab Appl Energy 63 1999 287 298
7. S. Singh, S. Singh, C.J.S. Pannu, and J. Singh Optimization of energy input for raising cotton crop in Punjab, 2000 Energy Convers Manage 41 2000 1851 1861
8. K.G. Mandal, K.P. Saha, P.L. Gosh, K.M. Hati, and K.K. Bandyopadhyay Bioenergy and economic analyses of soybean-based crop production systems in central India Biomass Bioenergy 23 2002 337 345
9. H. Singh, D. Mishra, and N.M. Nahar Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India-part-I Energy Convers Manage 43 2002 2275 2286
10. Singh JM. On farm use pattern in different cropping systems in Haryana, India. Master Thesis (unpublished). International Institute of Management, University of Flensburg, Germnay; 2002.
11. H. Singh, D. Mishra, N.M. Nahar, and M. Ranjan Energy use pattern in production agriculture of a typical village in arid zone, India-part-II Energy Convers Manage 43 2003 1053 1067
12. E.J. Hetz Energy utilization in fruit production in Chile Agric Mech Asia Africa Latin America (AMA) 298 2 1998 17 20
13. I. Gezer, M. Acaroglu, and H. Haciseferogullari Use of energy and labour in apricot agriculture in Turkey Biomass Bioenergy 24 2003 215 219
14. I. Onal, and M. Tozan Energy budget and work requirements of the alternative production systems in the processing tomato production 10. National Agricultural Mechanization Congress, Adana, Turkey 1986 p. 216-28 (in Turkish)
15. Agriculture Province Directorship. Annual study report of 2000, Antalya, Turkey; 2001 (in Turkish).
16. Publications of Agriculture Ministry. The lands of Antalya Province, Ankara, Turkey; 1993 (in Turkish).
17. Restrictions (1986-1997) of Meteorology General Directorship, Ankara, Turkey; 1998 (in Turkish).
18. T. Yamane Elementary sampling theory 1967 Prentice Hall, Inc. Englewood Cliffs, NJ
19. D. De, S. Singh, and H. Chandra Technological impact an energy consumption in rainfed soybean cultivation in Madhya Pradesh Appl Energy 70 2001 193 213
20. Kaltcshmitt M, Reinhardt GA. Ecological energy balance sheets in renewable energy source. Friedr. Vieweg, Sohn Verlagsgesellschaft mbH, Braunschweig, Weisbaden, Germany; 1997 (in German).
21. M. Acaroglu Energy balance sheets in agricultural production-I Online J Selcuk Tech 2 2 2002 1 18 Konya, Turkey (in Turkish)
22. Shresta DS. Energy input-output and their cost analysis in Nepalese agriculture. See also: http://www.public.iastate.edu/∼dev/pdfdocs/Energy. PDF.
23. Embodied energy. See also: http://www.greenhouse.gov.au/yourhome/ technical/pdf/fs31.pdf.
24. Embodied energy coefficients. See also: http://www.arch.vuw.ac.nz/cbpr/ embodied_energy/files/ee-coefficients.pdf.
25. Embodied energy in New Zealand materials. See also: http://www.converge. org.nz/atla/new-11-98-p4.html.
26. G.N. Tiwari Greenhouse technology for controlled environment 2003 Alpha Science International Ltd Pangbourne, England
27. Isik A, Sabanci A, Aganoglu V. Evaluation of the efficient factors for purchasing and rental cost of the agricultural machinery in the Cukurova region. In: 11th National agricultural mechanization congress, Erzurum, Turkey; 1988. p. 114-24 (in Turkish).
28. I. Yilmaz Input use and production costs of tomatoes, green pepper and eggplant under greenhouse in the Antalya region, Cukurova University J Agric Faculty 11 4 1996 155 164 Adana, Turkey (in Turkish)
29. Sindir KO. Machinery choosing and models of multi-farm use in agriculture. Publications of General Directorate of Rural Services, No: 110, Ankara, Turkey (in Turkish).
30. Budget for Greenhouse Tomatoes. Mississippi State University, Extention Services. See also: http://msucares.com/pubs/publications/p2257.pdf.
31. S. Singh, S. Singh, J.P. Mittal, J.S. Pannu, and B.S. Bhangoo Energy inputs and crop yield relationships for rice in Punjab Energy 19 10 1994 1061 1065