A baseline perspective on disability subgroup reporting

Journal of Special Education

Volumn 39, Issue 4, 2006, Pages 246-254

  Thurlow, Martha L ^a,b   Wiley, Hilda Ives ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA   (United States)

^b 350 Elliott Hall ^*  (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32844465998     PISSN: 00224669     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1177/00224669060390040501     Document Type: Review

References (29)

1. Achieve. (2004a). Do graduation tests measure up? A closer look at state high school exit exams. Washington, DC: Author.
2. Achieve. (2004b). Ready or not: Creating a high school diploma that counts. Washington, DC: Author.
3. Bielinski, J., Thurlow, M. L., Callender, S., & Bolt, S. (2001). On the road to accountability: Reporting outcomes for students with disabilities (Technical Report 32). Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
4. Center on Education Policy. (2004). From the capital to the classroom: Year 2 of the No Child Left Behind Act. Washington, DC: Author.
5. Cibulka, J. G., & Derlin, R. L. (1995). State educational performance reporting policies in the V.S.: Accountability's many faces. (ERIC Abstract ED 401 613)
6. Erickson, R. N., Thurlow, M. L., & Thor, K. (1995). 1994 state special education outcomes. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
7. Erickson, R., Ysseldyke, J., & Thurlow, M. (1997). Neglected numerators, drifting denominators, and fractured fractions: Determining participation rates for students with disabilities. Diagnostique, 23(2), 105-115.
8. Fast, E. F., Blank, R. K., Potts, A., & Williams, A. (2002). A guide to effective accountability reporting. Washington. DC: Council of Chief State School Officers.
9. Koenig, J. A. (2002). Reporting test results for students with disabilities and English-language learners: Summary of a workshop. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
10. Koretz, D., & Hamilton, L. (2001). The performance of students with disabilities of New York's revised Regents Comprehensive Examination in English (CSE Technical Report 540). Los Angeles: University of California, National Center for Research on Evaluation, Standards, and Student Testing.
11. McGrew, K. S., Thurlow, M. L., Shriner, J. G., & Spiegel, A. N. (1992). Inclusion of students with disabilities in national and state data collection programs (Technical Report 2). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
12. McGrew, K. S., Thurlow, M. L., & Spiegel, A. N. (1993). An investigation of the exclusion of students with disabilities in national data collection programs. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 15, 339-352.
13. National Research Council. (1999). Testing, teaching, and learning: A guide for states and school districts. Washington, DC: National Academy Press.
14. Shriner, J. G., & Thurlow, M. L. (1992). State special education outcomes 1991. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
15. Thompson, S. J., Thurlow, M. L., & Lazarus, S. (2001). Reporting on the state assessment performance of students with disabilities (Topical Review No. 3). College Park: University of Maryland, Education Policy Reform Research Institute.
16. Thurlow, M., Elliott, J., & Ysseldyke, J. (1998). Testing students with disabilities: Practical strategies for complying with district and state requirements. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
17. Thurlow, M. L., House, A., Boys, C., Scott, D., & Ysseldyke, J. (2000). State participation and accommodations policies for students with disabilities: 1999 update (Synthesis Report 33). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
18. Thurlow, M. L., Langenfeld, K. L., Nelson, J. R., Shin, H., & Coleman, J. E. (1998). State accountability reports: What are states saying about students with disabilities? (Technical Report 20). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
19. Thurlow, M. L., Nelson, J. R., Teelucksingh, E., & Ysseldyke, J. E. (2000). Where's Waldo? A third search for students with disabilities in state accountability reports (Technical Report 25). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
20. Thurlow, M., Quenemoen, R., Thompson, S., & Lehr, C. (2001). Principles and characteristics of inclusive assessment and accountability systems (Synthesis Report 40). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
21. Thurlow, M. L., & Thompson, S. J. (1999). District and state standards and assessments: Building an inclusive accountability system. Journal of Special Education Leadership, 12, 3-10.
22. Thurlow, M. L., & Wiley, H. I. (2004). Almost there in public reporting of assessment results for students with disabilities (Technical Report 39). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
23. Thurlow, M., Wiley, H. I., & Bielinski, J. (2003). Going public: What 2000-2001 reports tell us about the performance of students with disabilities (Technical Report 35). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
24. Thurlow, M. L., Ysseldyke, J. E., & Silverstein, B. (1995). Testing accommodations for students with disabilities. Journal of Remedial and Special Education, 16, 260-270.
25. U.S. Department of Education. (1999). Peer reviewer guidance for evaluating evidence of final assessments under Title I of the Elementary and Secondary Education Act. Washington, DC: Author.
26. U.S. Department of Education. (2003). Report cards: Title I. Part A: Nonregulatory guidance. Washington, DC: Author.
27. Ysseldyke, J., & Bielinski, J. (2002). Effect of different methods of reporting and reclassification on trends in test scores for students with disabilities. Exceptional Children, 68, 189-200.
28. Ysseldyke, J. E., Thurlow, M. L., Langenfeld, K., Nelson, J. R., Teelucksingh, E., & Seyfarth, A. (1998). Educational results for students with disabilities: What do the data tell us? (Technical Report 23). Minneapolis: University of Minnesota, National Center on Educational Outcomes.
29. Zlatos, B. (1994). Don't test, don't tell: Is "academic red-shirting" skewing the way we rank our schools? The American School Board Journal, 181, 24-28.