Practical design and implementation considerations in pay-for-performance programs

American Journal of Managed Care

Volumn 12, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 77-80

  Williams, Thomas R ^a  

^a Integrated Healthcare Association   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONSENSUS; HEALTH CARE PLANNING; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HEALTH PROGRAM; MANAGED CARE ORGANIZATION; MEDICAL FEE; PAY FOR PERFORMANCE; PERFORMANCE MEASUREMENT SYSTEM; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RELIABILITY; REVIEW; UNITED STATES;

GUIDELINES; MANAGED CARE PROGRAMS; PHYSICIAN INCENTIVE PLANS; QUALITY ASSURANCE, HEALTH CARE; UNITED STATES;

EID: 32844461401     PISSN: 10880224     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (7)

1. Baker G. Pay for Performance Issues and Trends: Key Findings from the Med-Vantage 2005 National Pay for Performance Survey. San Francisco, Calif: Med-Vantage, Inc; November 17, 2005.
2. American Medical Association. Principles for pay-for-performance programs. June 21, 2005. Available at: http://www.ama-assn.org/ama1/pub/upload/ mm/368/principles4pay62705.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2006.
3. American Academy of Family Physicians. Pay for performance. Available at: http://www.aafp.org/x30307.xml. Accessed January 10, 2006.
4. American College of Cardiology. ACCF principles to guide physician pay-for-performance programs: for delivery of cardiology care. May 28, 2003. Available at: http://www.acc.org/advocacy/pdfs/ACCFP4PPrinciplesFinal.pdf. Accessed January 10, 2006.
5. Damberg CL, Raube K, Williams T, Shortell SM. Paying for performance: implementing a statewide project in California. Qual Manag Health Care. 2005;14(2):66-79.
6. Forrest CB, Villagra VG, Pope JE. Managing the metric versus managing the patient: the physician's view of pay for performance. Am J Manag Care. 2006;12(1):85-87.
7. Robinson JC. The end of managed care. JAMA. 2001;285(20):2622-2628.