Argumentativeness and the theory of reasoned action

Communication Quarterly

Volumn 46, Issue 2, 1998, Pages 177-193

  Stewart, Robert A ^a   Roach, K David ^a  

^a TEXAS TECH UNIVERSITY   (United States)

Author keywords

Argumentativeness; Religious orientation; Theory of reasoned action

Indexed keywords

EID: 32744458214     PISSN: 01463373     EISSN: 17464102     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/01463379809370094     Document Type: Article

References (27)

1. Ajzen, I., 1985. “ From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior ”. In Action‐control: From cognition to behavior, Edited by: Kuhn, J., and Beckman, J., 11–39. Heidelberg: Springer.
2. Ajzen, I., and Fishbein, M., 1980. Understanding attitudes and predicting social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice‐Hall.
3. Allport, G. W., and Ross, J. M., 1967. Personal religious orientation and prejudice. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 5: 432–433.
4. Atkinson, J. W., 1966. “ The mainsprings of achievement‐oriented activity ”. In Motivation & achievement, Edited by: Atkinson, J. W., and Raynor, J. O., 13–41. Washington, DC: V. H. Winston & Sons.
5. Boster, F. J., Levine, T., and Kazoleas, D., 1993. The impact of argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness on strategic diversity and persistence in compliance‐gaining behavior. Communication Quarterly, 41: 405–414.
6. Boyd, B., and Wandersman, A., 1991. Predicting undergraduate condom use with the Fishbein and Ajzen and the Triandis Attitude‐behavior models: Implications for public health interventions. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 21: 1810–1830.
7. Chan, D. K‐S., and Fishbein, M., 1993. Determinants of college women's intentions to tell their partners to use condoms. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 23: 1455–1470.
8. DeBono, K. G., and Omoto, A. M., 1994. Individual differences in predicting behavioral intentions from attitude and subjective norm. The Journal of Social Psychology, 133: 825–831.
9. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I., 1975. Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior, Reading, MA: Addison‐Wesley.
10. Fishbein, M., Bandura, A., Triandis, H. C., Kanfer, F. H., Becker, M. H., and Middlestadt, S. E., 1992. Factors influencing behavior and behavior change, Report prepared for the National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) Bethesda, MD: NIMH.
11. Gorsuch, R. L., and Wakeman, E. P., 1991. A test and expansion of the Fishbein model on religious attitudes and behavior in Thailand. The International Journal for the Psychology of Religion, 1: 33–40.
12. Infante, D. A., 1981. Trait argumentativeness as a predictor of communicative behavior in situations requiring argument. Central States Speech Journal, 32: 266–272.
13. Infante, D. A., 1987. “ Aggressiveness ”. In Personality and interpersonal communication, Edited by: McCroskey, J. C., and Daly, J. A., 157–192. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publications.
14. Infante, D. A., 1988. Arguing constructively, Prospect Heights, IL: Waveland Press.
15. Infante, D. A., Anderson, C. M., Martin, M. M., Herington, A. D., and Kim, J., 1993. Subordinates’ satisfaction and perceptions of superiors’ compliance‐gaining tactics, argumentativeness, verbal aggressiveness, and style. Management Communication Quarterly, 6: 307–326.
16. Infante, D. A., and Gorden, W. I., 1985. Superiors’ argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness as predictors of subordinates’ satisfaction. Human Communication Research, 12: 117–125.
17. Infante, D. A., and Gorden, W. I., 1991. How employees see the boss: Test of an argumentative and affirming model of supervisors’ communicative behavior. Western Journal of Speech Communication, 55: 294–304.
18. Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S., 1982. A conceptualization and measure of argumentativeness. Journal of Personality Assessment, 46: 72–80.
19. Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S., 1993. Relations between argumentative motivation, and advocacy and refutation on controversial issues. Communication Quarterly, 41: 415–426.
20. Infante, D. A., and Rancer, A. S., 1996. “ Argumentativeness and verbal aggressiveness: A review of recent theory and research ”. In Communication Yearbook, Edited by: Burleson, B. R., Vol. 19, 319–351. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
21. Onyekwere, E. O., Rubin, R. B., and Infante, D. A., 1991. Interpersonal perception and communication satisfaction as a function of argumentativeness and ego‐involvement. Communication Quarterly, 39: 35–47.
22. Rancer, A. S., Baukus, R. A., and Infante, D. A., 1985. Relations between argumentativeness and belief structures about arguing. Communication Education, 34: 37–47.
23. Richmond, B. P., McCroskey, J. C., and McCroskey, L. L., 1989. An investigation of self‐perceived communication competence and personality orientations. Communication Research Reports, 6: 28–36.
24. Roach, K. D., 1992. Teacher demographic characteristics and levels of teacher argumentativeness. Communication Research Reports, 9: 65–71.
25. Roach, K. D., 1995. Teaching assistant argumentativeness and perceptions of power use in the classroom. Communication Research Reports, 12: 94–103.
26. Stewart, R. A., and Roach, K. D., 1993. Argumentativeness, religious orientation, and reactions to argument situations involving religious versus nonreligious issues. Communication Quarterly, 41: 26–39.
27. Triandis, H. C., 1977. Interpersonal behavior, CA: Brooks/Cole Publishing company.