Learning theory as applied to mechanical CAD training of novices

International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction

Volumn 19, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 305-322

  Hamade, Ramsey F ^a   Artail, Hassan A ^a   Jaber, Mohamad Y ^b  

^a AMERICAN UNIVERSITY OF BEIRUT   (Lebanon)

^b RYERSON UNIVERSITY   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

DESIGN MODELS; INVERSE RELATIONSHIP; LEARNING CURVES; LEARNING THEORY; MECHANICAL CAD; MECHANICAL COMPUTER-AIDED DESIGNS; PRODUCTION TIME; TIME-EFFICIENT;

PERSONNEL TRAINING;

COMPUTER AIDED DESIGN;

EID: 32644449989     PISSN: 10447318     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1207/s15327590ijhc1903_2     Document Type: Article

References (31)

1. Beitz, W., Langner, T., Luczak, H., Muller, T., & Springer, J. (1990). Evaluation of a compact CAD course in laboratory experiments. International Journal of Human-Computer Interface, 2, 111-135.
2. Bhavnani, S. K., John, B. E., & Flemming, U. (1999). Strategic use of CAD: An empirically inspired, theory-based course. Proceedings of the 1999 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, May 15-20, Pittsburgh, PA, 183-190.
3. Can you say "fun CAD training"? (2001). Design News, 56, 36.
4. Compton, P., & Jansen. R. (1990). A philosophical basis for knowledge acquisition. Knowledge Acquisition, 2, 241-257.
5. Coury, B. G., & Strauss, R.A. (1998). Cognitive models in user interface design. Proceedings of the 1998 42nd Annual Meeting of the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 325-329.
6. Dar-El, E. M., Ayas, K., & Gilad, I. (1995a). A dual-phase mode for the individual learning process in industrial tasks. IIE Transactions, 27, 265-271.
7. Dar-El, E. M., Ayas, K., & Gilad, I. (1995b). Predicting performance times for long cycle time tasks. IIE Transactions, 27, 272-281.
8. Dutton, J., & Thomas A. (1984). Treating progress functions as a managerial opportunity. Academy of Management Review, 9, 235-247.
9. Dvorak, P., & Teschler, L. (1993). Climbing CAD's learning curve. Machine Design, 65, 52-55.
10. Engelke, W. D. (1987). How to integrate CAD/CAM systems: Management and technology. New York: Decker.
11. Forslin, J., & Thulestedt, B. M. (1989). Computer-aided design: Acase strategy in implementing a new technology. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 36, 191-201.
12. Ghosal, S. (1995). Cognitive issues in interface design and product development. Proceedings of the 1st 1995 Regional Conference IEEE Engineering in Medicine & Biology Society and 14th Conference of the Biomedical Engineering Society of India, February 15-18, 1995, New Delhi, India, 1.77-1.78.
13. Hoffmann, A., & Thakar, S. (1991). Acquiring knowledge by efficient query learning. Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence (IJCAI91), August, 1991, Sydney, Australia, 783-788.
14. Johnson, D. G. (1990). Knowledge representation and manipulation for engineering design. GEC Review, 6, 47-59.
15. Klinger, D. W., & Gomes, M. E. (1993). Cognitive systems engineering application for interface design. Proceedings of the 37th Annual Meeting the Human Factors and Ergonomics Society, 1, 16-20.
16. Lang, G. T., Eberts, R. E., Gabel, M. G., & Barash, M. M. (1991). Extracting and using procedural knowledge in a CAD task. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 38, 257-268.
17. Learning CAD from TV. (1997). Design Engineering, p. 19.
18. Linster, M. (1993). Explicit and operational models as a basis for second generation knowledge-acquisition tools. In J. M. David, J. P. Krivine, & R. Simmons (Eds.), Second generation expert systems (pp. 477-506). New York: Springer-Verlag.
19. MacCormick, R. (1997). Conceptual and procedural knowledge. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 7, 141-159.
20. McDermott, C. M., & Marucheck, A. (1995). Training in CAD: An exploratory study of methods and benefits. IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 42, 410-418.
21. McDougal, T. F., & Hammond, K. J. (1993). Representing and using procedural knowledge to build geometry proofs. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 11-15, 1993, Washington, DC, 60-65.
22. Moczulski, W. (2002). Methodology of declarative and procedural knowledge acquisition for machinery diagnostics. Proceedings of SPIE, 4733, 204-215.
23. Moody, S. A. (1996). Incorporating procedural knowledge within a declarative modeling system. Journal of Intelligent Systems, 6, 45-62.
24. Rodriguez, J., Ridge, J., Dickinson, A., & Whitman, R. (1998). CAD training using interactive computer sessions emphasizing design intent. DETC98: ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, DECT98/CIE-5504.
25. Schmitz, B. (1999). Computer-based CAD training: The next step. Computer-Aided Engineering, 18, 32-34.
26. Watkins, A., Dimopoulos, N. J., Neville, S., & Li, K. F. (1993). Flowtool: A procedural-knowledge acquisition tool. Proceedings of the IEEE Pacific Rim Conference on Communications, Computer and Signal Processing, 31-34.
27. Wingo, W. (1995). Still got CAD fright? Software aims to boost learning curve. Design News, 50, 20-26.
28. Wright T. (1936). Factors affecting the cost of airplanes. Journal of Aeronautical Science, 3, 122-128.
29. You, I. C., Chu, C. N., & Kashyap, R. L. (1991). Knowledge representation and control structure based on three-dimensional symbolic skeletons for CAD/CAM integration. Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Industrial and Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence and Expert Systems, 90, 357-364.
30. Yule, R. (2002). How CAD training pays for itself. Machine Design, 74, 96.
31. Zito-Wolf, R., & Alterman, R. (1993). Framework and an analysis of current proposals for the case-based organization and representation of procedural knowledge. Proceedings of the National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, July 11-15, 1993, Washington, DC, 73-78.