Historical studies of rhetorical women here and there: Methodological challenges to dominant interpretive frameworks

Rhetoric Society Quarterly

Volumn 32, Issue 1, 2002, Pages 81-97

  Wu, Hui ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CENTRAL ARKANSAS   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 32544457006     PISSN: 02773945     EISSN: 1930322X     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/02773940209391222     Document Type: Article

References (49)

1. Alcoff, Linda. “Cultural Feminism versus Post-Structuralism: The Identity Crisis in Feminist Theory”. Signs 13 (1988): 405-436.
2. Arndt, Susan. “African Gender Trouble and African Womanism: An Interview with Chikwenye Ogunyemi and Wanjira Muthoni”. Signs 25 (2000): 709-726.
3. bell, hooks. Ain’t J a Woman?: Black Women and Feminism. Boston: South End, 1981.
4. bell, hooks. Yearning: Race, Gender, and Cultural Politics. Boston: South End, 1990.
5. Bizzell, Patricia. “Feminist Methods of Research in the History of Rhetoric: What Difference Do They Make?” Rhetoric Society Quarterly 30 (Fall 2000): 5-17.
6. Bock, Gisela. “Challenging Dichotomies: Perspectives on Women’s History”. Writing Women’s History: International Perspectives. Eds. Karen Offen, Ruth Roach Pierson, and Jane Rendall. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991. 124.
7. Bunzl, Martin. Real History: Reflections on Historical Practice. New York: Routledge, 1998.
8. Campbell, Karlyn. Man Cannot Speak for Her: A Critical Study of Early Feminist Rhetoric. Vol. 1. Westport, CT: Praeger, 1989.
9. Campbell, Karlyn. Ed. Man Cannot Speak for Her: Key Texts of the Early Feminists. Vol. 2. New York: Greenwood, 1989.
10. Canning, Kathleen. ‘Teminist History after the Linguistic Turn: Historicizing Discourse and Experience”. History and Theory: Feminist Research, Debates, and Contestations. Eds. Barbara Laslett, et al. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1997. 416-452.
11. Cavendish, Margaret. Orations of Divers Sorts Accommodated to Divers Places: Written by the Thrice Noble, Illustrious and Excellent Princess, the Lady of Marchioness of Newcastle. London: Anno Dom, 1662.
12. Chow, Ray. Writing Diaspora: Tactics of Intervention in the Contemporary Cultural Studies. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1993.
13. de Certeau, Michel. Heterologies: Discourse on the Other. Trans. Brian Massumi. Minneapolis: University of Minneapolis, 1986.
14. de Oliveira, Rosiska Darcy. In Praise of Difference: The Emergence of a Global Feminism. Trans. Peggy Sharpe. Rutgers University Press, 1999.
15. Elton, G.R. The Practice of History. New York: Thomas Y. Crowell, 1967.
16. Enos, Richard. “Recovering the Lost Art of Researching the History of Rhetoric”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 29 (Fall 1999): 7-20.
17. Evans, Judith. Feminist Theory Today. London: Sage, 1995.
18. Ferreira-Buckley, Linda. “Rescuing the Archives from Foucault”. College English 61 (May 1999): 577-583.
19. Gale, Xin Liu, “Historical Studies and Postmodernism: Re-reading Aspasia of Miletus”. College English 62 (January 2000): 361-386.
20. Gale, Xin Liu,. “Xin Liu Gale Responds”. College English 63 (September 2000): 105-107.
21. Glenn, Cheryl. Rhetoric Retold: Regendering the Tradition from Antiquity through the Renaissance. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1997.
22. Glenn, Cheryl. “Comment: Truth, Lies, and Method: Revisiting Feminist Historiography”. College English 62 (January 2000): 387-389.
23. Harding, Sandra, ed. Feminism and Methodology. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
24. Hartsock, Nancy C. “The Feminist Standpoint: Developing the Ground for a Specifically Feminist Historical Materialism”. Feminism and Methodology. Ed. Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.
25. Jarratt, Susan C. Rereading the Sophists: Classical Rhetoric Refigured. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1991.
26. Jarratt, Susan C. “Comment: Rhetoric and Feminism: Together Again”. College English 62 (January 2000): 390-393.
27. Kelly-Gadol, Joan. “The Social Relation of the Sexes: Methodological Implications of Women’s History”. Feminism and Methodology. Ed. Sandra Harding. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1987.15-28.
28. Lee, Wen Shu. “In the Name of Chinese Women”. Quarterly Journal of Speech 84 (1998): 283-302.
29. Logan, Shirley W. Ed. With Pen and Voice: A Critical Anthology of Nineteenth-Cen- Logan, Shirley W. Ed tury African-American Women. Carbondale: Southern Illinois UniversityPress, 1995.
30. Logan, Shirley W. Ed. We Are Coming: The Persuasive Discourse of Nineteenth-Century Black Women. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1999.
31. Lunsford, Andrea, ed. Reclaiming Rhetorica: Women in the Rhetorical Tradition. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995.
32. Miller, Thomas, and Melody Bowdon. “A Rhetorical Stance on the Archives of Civic Action”. College English 61 (May 1999): 591-98.
33. Mohanty, Chandra Talpade, Ann Russo, and Lourdes Torres, eds. Third World Women and the Politics of Feminism. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
34. Offen, Karen, Ruth Roach Pierson, and Jane Rendall, eds. Writing Women \s History: International Perspectives. Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1991.
35. Ratcliffe, Krista. Anglo-American Feminist Challenges to the Rhetorical Tradition: Virginia Woolf, Mary Daly, Adrienne Rich. Carbondale: Southern Illinois University Press, 1995.
36. Roen, Duane, H. Stuart C. Brown, and Theresa Enos, eds. Living Rhetoric and Composition: Stories of the Discipline. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1999.
37. Rorty, Richard. “Feminism and Pragmatism”. Truth and Progress. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1998. 202-227.
38. Royster, Jacqueline Jones. Traces of a Stream: Literacy and Social Change among African American Women. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 2000.
39. Ryan, Kathleen, and Elizabeth J. Natalie. “Fusing Horizons: Standpoint Hermeneutics and Invitational Rhetoric”. Rhetoric Society Quarterly 31 (Spring 2001): 69-90.
40. Scott, Joan. “Women’s History”. New Perspectives on Historical Writing. Ed. Peter Burke. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press, 1991.42-66.
41. Scott, Joan, Cora Kaplan, and Debra Keates, eds. Transitions, Environments, Translations: Feminists in International Politics. New York: Routledge, 1997.
42. Sutherland, Christine M. “Aspiring to the Rhetorical Tradition: A Study of Margaret Cavendish”. Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women. Ed. Molly Meijer Wertheimer. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1997. 255-271.
43. Swearingen, C. Jan. “A Lover’s Discourse: Diotima, Logos, and Desire”. Reclaiming Rhetorica. Ed. Andrea Lunsford. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1995.25-51.
44. Tanesini, Alessandra. An Introduction to Feminist Epistemologies. Malden, Mass: Blackwell, 1999.
45. Thumer, Manuela. “Subject to Change: Theories and Paradigms of U.S. Feminist History”. Journal of Women s History 9 (Summer 1997): 122-146.
46. Wertheimer, Molly Meijer, ed. Listening to Their Voices: The Rhetorical Activities of Historical Women. Columbia: University of South Carolina Press, 1997.
47. Wu, Hui. “A Comment on ‘Historical Studies and Postmodernism: Rereading Aspasia of Miletus’”. College English 63 (September 2000): 102-105.
48. Zhang, Kangkang. ni dui ming yun shuo “bu" (Say "No” to Your Fate). Shanghai: Shanghai Knowledge Press, 1994.
49. Zinsser, Judith, P. ‘“Much More is at Stake Here: A Response to ‘The Construction of History’”. Journal of Women’s History 9.3 (1997): 132-139.