Response of the difference-of-Gaussians model to circular drifting-grating patches

Visual Neuroscience

Volumn 22, Issue 4, 2005, Pages 437-446

  Einevoll, G T ^a   Plesser, H E ^a  

^a NORWEGIAN UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES   (Norway)

Author keywords

Circular patches; Difference of Gaussians model; Drifting gratings; Receptive field

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; COMPUTER PROGRAM; GEOMETRY; MATHEMATICAL MODEL; NORMAL DISTRIBUTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RECEPTIVE FIELD; STATISTICAL ANALYSIS;

ANIMALS; LINEAR MODELS; MODELS, NEUROLOGICAL; NEURONS; PHOTIC STIMULATION; RETINA; VISUAL FIELDS; VISUAL PATHWAYS; VISUAL PERCEPTION;

EID: 32544451615     PISSN: 09525238     EISSN: 14698714     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1017/S0952523805224057     Document Type: Article

References (26)

1. ABRAMOWITZ, M. & STEGUN, I.A. (1965). Handbook of Mathematical Functions. New York: Dover.
2. ALLITO, H.J. & USREY, W.M. (2004). Temporal evolution of extra-classical suppression in the LGN: Distinguishing feedforward and feedback mechanisms. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 409.5.
3. ANDOLINA, I.M., WANG, W., JONES, H.E., SALT, T.E. & SILLITO, A.M. (2002). Effects of feedback on cat LGN cell spatial summation parameters dissected with the difference of Gaussian model (DOGM). Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 352.17.
4. BRACEWELL, R.N. (1986). The Fourier Transform and its Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.
5. BUTKOV, E. (1968). Mathematical Physics. New York: Addison-Wesley.
6. CUDEIRO, J. & SILLITO, A.M. (1996). Spatial frequency tuning of orientation-discontinuity-sensitive corticofugal feedback to the cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology 490, 481-492.
7. DAWIS, S., SHAPLEY, R., KAPLAN, E. & TRANCHINA, D. (1984). The receptive field organization of X-cells in the cat: Spatiotemporal coupling and asymmetry. Vision Research 24, 549-564.
8. EINEVOLL, G.T. & HEGGELUND, P. (2000). Mathematical models for the spatial receptive-field organization of nonlagged X cells in dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of cat. Visual Neuroscience 17, 871-886.
9. EINEVOLL, G.T. & PLESSER, H.E. (2002). Linear mechanistic models for the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus of cat probed using drifting-grating stimuli. Network: Computation in Neural Systems 13, 503-530.
10. EINEVOLL, G.T. & PLESSER, H.E. (2003). Extended DOG receptive-field model for LGN relay cells incorporating cortical-feedback effects. Society for Neuroscience Abstracts 68.11.
11. ENROTH-CUGELL, C. & ROBSON, J.G. (1966). The contrast sensitivity of retinal ganglion cells of the cat. Journal of Physiology 187, 517-552.
12. ENROTH-CUGELL, C., ROBSON, J.G., SCHWEITZER-TONG, D.E. & WATSON, A.B. (1983). Spatio-temporal interactions in cat retinal ganglion cells showing linear spatial summation. Journal of Physiology 341, 279-307.
13. GRADSHTEYN, I.S., RYZHIK, I.M. & JEFFREY, A. (2000). Tables of Integrals, Series and Products. New York: Academic Press.
14. HEEGER, D.J. (1991). Nonlinear model of neural responses in cat visual cortex. In Computational Models of Visual Processing, ed. LANDY, M.S. & MOVSHON, J.A., pp. 119-134. Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press.
15. KAPLAN, E., MARCUS, S. & SO, Y.T. (1979). Effects of dark adaptation on spatial and temporal properties of receptive fields in cat lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology 294, 561-580.
16. MUKHERJEE, P. & KAPLAN, E. (1995). Dynamics of neurons in the cat lateral geniculate nucleus: In vivo electrophysiology and computational modeling. Journal of Neurophysiology 74, 1222-1243.
17. NORTON, T.T., HOLDEFER, R.N. & GODWIN, D.W. (1989). Effects of bicuculline on receptive field center sensitivity of relay cells in lateral geniculate nucleus. Brain Research 488, 348-352.
18. RODIECK, R.W. (1965). Quantitative analysis of cat retinal ganglion cell response to visual stimuli. Vision Research 5, 583-601.
19. SHAPLEY, R. & LENNIE, P. (1985). Spatial frequency analysis in the visual system. Annual Review of Neuroscience 8, 547-583.
20. SILLITO, A., CUDEIRO, J. & MURPHY, P. (1993). Orientation sensitive elements in the corticofugal influence on centre-surround interactions in the dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Experimental Brain Research 93, 6-16.
21. SILLITO, A. & JONES, H.E. (1997). Functional organization influencing neurotransmission in the lateral geniculate nucleus. In Thalamus, Vol. II, ed. STERIADE, M., JONES, E.G. & MCCORMICK, D.A., pp. 1-52. Amsterdam: Elsevier.
22. SILLITO, A.M. & JONES, H.E. (2002). Corticothalamic interactions in the transfer of visual information. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B (London) 357, 1739-52.
23. SO, Y.T. & SHAPLEY, R. (1981). Spatial tuning of cells in and around lateral geniculate nucleus of the cat: X and Y relay cells and perigeniculate interneurons. Journal of Neurophysiology 45, 107-120.
24. SOODAK, R.E. (1986). Two-dimensional modeling of visual receptive fields using Gaussian subunits. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the U.S.A. 83, 9259-9263.
25. TROY, J.B. (1983). Spatial contrast sensitivities of X and Y type neurones in the cat's dorsal lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Physiology 344, 399-417.
26. UHLRICH, D.J., TAMAMAKI, N., MURPHY, P.C. & SHERMAN, S.M (1995). Effects of brain stem parabrachial activation on receptive field properties of cells in the cat's lateral geniculate nucleus. Journal of Neurophysiology 73, 2428-2447.