Open and obvious under what conditions?

American Journal of Forensic Psychology

Volumn 24, Issue 1, 2006, Pages 23-32

  Campbell, Terence W ^a  

^a NONE

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

AWARENESS; COGNITION; FALL RISK; FALL RISK ASSESSMENT; FALLING; HUMAN; INTELLIGENCE; LAW SUIT; LEGAL EVIDENCE; REVIEW; RISK FACTOR; SELECTIVE ATTENTION; VISUAL DISCRIMINATION;

EID: 32544449976     PISSN: 07331290     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Review

References (17)

1. Ingram LP: Woman who fell in snowy lot gets her claim to jury. Michigan Lawyers Weekly, October 25, 2004; 18:1, 8
2. Neiser U: The control of information pickup in selective looking, in Perception and its Development. Edited by Pick AD. Hillsdale, New Jersey, Erlbaum, 1979
3. Simons DJ, Chabris CF: Gorillas in our midst: sustained inattentional blindness for dynamic events. Perception 1999; 28:1059-1074
4. Haines RF: A breakdown in simultaneous information processing, in Presbyopia Research. Edited by Obrecht G, Stark LW. New York, Plenum Press, 1991
5. Mack A: Inattentional blindness: looking without seeing. Current Directions in Psychological Science 2003; 12:180-184
6. Folk CL, Remington RW, Wright JH: The structure of attentional control: contingent capture by apparent motion, abrupt onset, and color. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1994; 20:317-329
7. Most SB, Simons DJ, Scholl BJ, Jimenez R, Clifford E, Charbris C: How not to be seen: the contribution of similarity and selective ignoring to sustained inattentional blindness. Psychological Science 2001; 12:9-17
8. Folk CL, Remington RW, Johnston JC: Involuntary covert orienting is contingent on attentional control settings. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1992; 18:1030-1044
9. Kahneman D, Treisman A: Changing view of attention and automaticity, in Varieties of Attention. Edited by Davies DR. New York, Academic Press, 1984
10. Lavie N: Perceptual load as a necessary condition for selective attention. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1995; 21:451-468
11. Hawkins SA, Hastie R: Hindsight: biased judgments of past events after the outcomes are known. Psychological Bulletin 1990; 107:311-327
12. Fischoff B: Hindsight is not equal to foresight: the effect of outcome knowledge on judgment under uncertainty. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1975; 1:288-299
13. Wood G: The knew-it-all-along effect. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 1978; 4:345-353
14. Walster E: "Second guessing" important events. Human Relations 1967; 20:239-249
15. Muhm JR, Miller WE, Fontana RS, Sanderson DR, Uhlenhopp MA: Lung cancer detected during a screening program using four-month chest radiographs. Radiology 1983; 148:609-615
16. Harley EM, Carlsen KA, Loftus GR: The "saw-it-all-along" effect: demonstrations of visual hindsight bias. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 2004; 30:960-968
17. Bodenhausen GV: Second-guessing the jury: stereotypic and hindsight biases in perceptions of court cases. Journal of Applied Social Psychology 1990; 20:1112-1121