Digital mammography: 2005

Canadian Association of Radiologists Journal

Volumn 56, Issue 5, 2005, Pages 319-323

  Jong, Roberta A ^a   Yaffe, Martin J ^b  

^a SUNNYBROOK RESEARCH INSTITUTE   (Canada)

^b UNIVERSITY OF TORONTO   (Canada)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; BREAST CANCER; CONTRAST ENHANCEMENT; DIGITAL IMAGING; HUMAN; IMAGE DISPLAY; MAMMOGRAPHY; RADIOLOGY;

BREAST NEOPLASMS; CLINICAL TRIALS; CONTRAST MEDIA; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; FEMALE; HUMANS; MAMMOGRAPHY; MIDDLE AGED; QUALITY OF LIFE; RADIOGRAPHIC IMAGE ENHANCEMENT; TELERADIOLOGY;

EID: 32544448064     PISSN: 08465371     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (8)

1. Pisano ED, Yaffe MJ. Digital mammography. Radiology 2005;234:353-62.
2. Andriole KP. Display monitors for digital medical imaging. Journal of the American College of Radiology 2005;2:543-6.
3. Thurfjell E, Lernewall KA, Taube AAS. Benefit of independent double reading in population-based mammography screening program. Radiology 1994;191:241-4.
4. Birdwell RL, Bandodkar P, Ikeda DM. Computer-aided detection with screening mammography in a university hospital setting. Radiology 2005;236:451-7.
5. Jong RA, Yaffe MJ, Skarpathiotakis M, Shumak R, Danjoux NM, Gunesekara A, et al. Contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial experience. Radiology 2003;228:842-50.
6. Lewin JM, Isaacs PK, Vance V, Larke FJ. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital subtraction mammography: feasibility. Radiology 2003;229:261-8.
7. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Yaffe MJ, Hendrick RE, Tosteson AN, Fryback DG, et al. Radiology 2005;236:404-12.
8. Pisano ED, Gatsonis C, Hendrick E, Yaffe M, Baum JK, Acharyya S, et al. Diagnostic performance of digital versus film mammography for breast-cancer screening. N Engl J Med 2005;353:1773-83.