Mental disorder ethics: Theory and empirical investigation

Journal of Medical Ethics

Volumn 32, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 94-99

  Eastman, N ^a   Starling, B ^b  

^a ST GEORGE'S UNIVERSITY OF LONDON   (United Kingdom)

^b WELLCOME TRUST SANGER INSTITUTE   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ATTITUDE; CLINICAL PROTOCOL; HEALTH CARE POLICY; HUMAN; LAW; LEGAL ASPECT; MEDICAL ETHICS; MEDICAL RESEARCH; MENTAL DISEASE; MENTAL HEALTH CARE; PHYSICAL DISEASE; POLITICS; PSYCHIATRIST; PSYCHOLOGIST; RISK ASSESSMENT; THEORY;

ATTITUDE TO HEALTH; BIOETHICAL ISSUES; EMPIRICISM; ETHICS, MEDICAL; ETHICS, RESEARCH; HEALTH POLICY; HUMANS; MENTAL COMPETENCY; MENTAL DISORDERS; MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES; RISK ASSESSMENT;

EID: 32544445412     PISSN: 03066800     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/jme.2005.013276     Document Type: Article

References (20)

1. Szasz T. The myth of mental illness: foundations of a theory of personal conduct [rev ed]. New York: Harper and Row, 1974.
2. Szasz TS. Law, liberty and psychiatry. New York: Macmillan, 1963.
3. Fulford KWM. Moral theory and medical practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1989.
4. Fulford KWM. Analytic philosophy, brain science and the concept of disorder. In: Bloch C, Chodoff P, Green SA, eds. Psychiatric ethics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
5. Eastman NLG, Peay J. Law without enforcement: theory and practice. Law without enforcement: integrating mental health and justice. Oxford: Hart Publications, 1999.
6. Department of Health. National service framework for mental health: modern standards and service models for mental health. London: The Stationery Office, 1999, HSC 1999/223.
7. Mental Health Alliance. Submission to the joint parliamentary scrutiny committee for the draft mental health bill. London: The Stationery Office, 2005, HL paper 79-II, HC 95-II, Ev 155.
8. Mental Health Act Commission. Submission to the joint parliamentary scrutiny committee for the draft mental health bill. London: The Stationery Office, 2005, Ev 39.
9. Eastman N. Evidence to the joint parliamentary scrutiny committee for the draft mental health bill. London: The Stationery Office, 2005, HL paper 79-II, HC 95-II, Ev 339.
10. Bartlett A, Phillips L. Decision making and mental health law. In: Eastman NLG, Peay J, eds. Law without enforcement: integrating mental health and justice. Oxford: Hart Publications, 1999.
11. Grisso T, Applebaum PS, Hill-Fotouhi C. The MacCAT-T: a clinical tool to assess patients' capacities to make treatment decisions. Psychiatr Serv 1997;48:1415-19.
12. Raymont V, Bingley W, Buchanan A, et al. The prevalence and associations of mental incapacity in medical in-patients. Lancet 2004;364:1421-7.
13. Tan J, Hope T, Stewart A. Competence to refuse treatment in anorexia nervosa. Int J Law Psychiatry 2003;26:697-707.
14. Campbell AV. Mental health practice: can philosophy help? Aust N Z J Psychiatry (in press).
15. Peay J. Decisions and dilemmas: working with mental health law. Oxford: Hart, Publications, 2003.
16. Szmukler G, Holloway F. Mental health law is now a harmful anachronism. Psychiatr Bull 1998;22:662-5.
17. Gardner W, Hoge SK, Bennett NS, et al. Two scales for measuring patients' perceptions of coercion during mental hospital admission. Behav Sci Law 1993;11:307-21.
18. Breggin PR. Coercion of voluntary patients in an open hospital. In: Edwards RB, eds. Ethics of Psychiatry. New York: Prometheus Books, 1997.
19. Bindman J, Reid Y, Szmukler G, et al. Perceived coercion at admission to psychiatric hospital and engagement with follow up. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 2005;40:160-6.
20. Eastman NLG, Peay J. Afterword: integrating mental health and justice. Law without enforcement: integrating mental health and justice. Oxford: Hart Publications, 1999.