Positive assortative mating with family size as a function of predicted parental breeding values

Genetics

Volumn 171, Issue 3, 2005, Pages 1311-1320

  Lstiburek M ^a,c   Mullin, T J ^a   Mackay, T F C ^a   Huber, D ^b   Li, B ^a  

^a NORTH CAROLINA STATE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF FLORIDA   (United States)

^c CZECH UNIVERSITY OF LIFE SCIENCES PRAGUE   (Czech Republic)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; ASSORTATIVE MATING; FAMILY SIZE; FOREST; GENETIC MODEL; GENETIC VARIABILITY; GENOTYPE; HERITABILITY; INBREEDING; MULTIFACTORIAL INHERITANCE; NONHUMAN; PLANT BREEDING; PLANTATION; POPULATION; PREDICTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; PROGENY; QUANTITATIVE TRAIT; SIMULATION; STANDARDIZATION;

ANALYSIS OF VARIANCE; COMPUTER SIMULATION; GENETICS, POPULATION; INBREEDING; MODELS, GENETIC; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; TREES;

EID: 32544444710     PISSN: 00166731     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1534/genetics.105.041723     Document Type: Article

References (40)

1. BAKER, R. J., 1973 Assortative mating and artificial selection. Heredity 31: 231-238.
2. BULMER, M. G., 1985 The Mathematical Theory of Quantitative Genetics. Clarendon Press, Oxford.
3. COCKERHAM, C. C., 1967 Group inbreeding and coancestry. Genetics 56: 89-104.
4. CROW, J. F., 1986 Basic Concepts in Population, Quantitative, and Evolutionary Genetics. W. H. Freeman, New York.
5. DANELL, Ö., 1995 Breeding programs in Sweden. 1. General approach. SkogForsk. Arbetsrapport 302: 1-4.
6. DANUSEVICIUS, D., and D. LINDGREN, 2002 Efficiency of selection based on phenotype, clone and progeny testing in long-term breeding. Silvae Genet. 51: 19-26.
7. DE LANGE, A. O., 1974 A simulation study of the effects of assortative mating on the response to selection. Proceedings of the 1st World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Vol. III, pp. 421-425. Editorial Garsi, Madrid.
8. FALCONER, D. S., and T. F. C. MACKAY, 1996 Introduction to Quantitative Genetics. Longman, Harlow, UK.
9. GILMOUR, A. R., B. J. GOGEL, B. R. CULLIS, S. J. WELHAM and R. THOMPSON, 2002 ASReml User Guide Release 1.0. VSN International, Hemel Hempstead, UK.
10. GOMEZ-RAYA, L., and G. KLEMETSDAL, 1999 Two-stage selection strategies utilizing marker-quantitative trait locus information and individual performance. J. Anim. Sci. 77: 2008-2018.
11. GRUNDY, B., B. VILLANUEVA and J. A. WOOLLIAMS, 1998 Dynamic selection procedures for constrained inbreeding and their consequences for pedigree development. Genet. Res. 72: 159-168.
12. ISIK, F., B. LI, J. FRAMPTON and B. GOLDFARB, 2003 Efficiency of seedlings and rooted cuttings for testing and selection in Pinus taeda. For. Sci. 50: 44-53.
13. JORJANI, H., 1995 Genetic studies of assortative mating in selected and unselected populations. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Uppsala, Sweden.
14. KANG, H., 1989 Inbreeding effective population size under some artificial selection schemes. II. Normal distribution of breeding values. For. Sci. 35: 303-318.
15. KANG, H., and G. NAMKOONG, 1988 Inbreeding effective population size under some artificial selection schemes. I. Linear distribution of breeding values. Theor. Appl. Genet. 75: 333-339.
16. KARLSON, B., and O. ROSVALL, 1993 Breeding programmes in Sweden 3. Norway spruce, pp. 135-141 in Progeny Testing and Breeding Strategies: Proceedings of the Nordic Group of Tree Breeding, edited by S. J. Lee. Forestry Commission, Edinburgh.
17. L'ECUYER, P., R. SIMARD, E. J. CHEN and W. D. KELTON, 2002 An objected-oriented random-number package with many long streams and substreams. Oper. Res. 50: 1073-1075.
18. LINDGREN, D., 1986 How should breeders respond to breeding values? Proceedings of the IUFRO Conference Joint Meeting: Working Parties on Breeding Theory, Progeny Testing, Seed Orchards, North Carolina State University-Industry Cooperative Tree Improvement Program, Raleigh, NC, pp. 361-371.
19. LINDGREN, D., and T. J. MULLIN, 1997 Balancing gain and relatedness in selection. Silvae Genet. 46: 124-129.
20. LSTIBŮREK, M., T. J. MULLIN, D. LINDGREN and O. ROSVALL, 2004 Open-nucleus breeding strategies compared to population-wide positive assortative mating. II. Unequal distribution of testing effort. Theor. Appl. Genet. 109: 1169-1177.
21. LYNCH, M., and B. WALSH, 1998 Genetics and Analysis of Quantitative Traits. Sinauer Associates, Sunderland, MA.
22. MAHALOVICH, M. F., 1990 Modelling positive assortative mating and elite populations in recurrent selection programs for general combining ability. Ph.D. Thesis, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, NC.
23. MCKEAND, S., and F. BEINEKE, 1980 Sublining for half-sib breeding populations of forest trees. Silvae Genet. 29: 14-17.
24. MEUWISSEN, T. H. E., 1997 Maximizing the response of selection with a predefined rate of inbreeding. J. Anim. Sci. 75: 934-940.
25. MRODE, R. A., 1996 Linear Models for the Prediction of Animal Breeding Values. CAB International, Wallingford, Oxon, UK.
26. MULLIN, T. J., and Y. S. PARK, 1994 Genetic parameters and age to age correlations in clonally replicated test of black spruce. Can. J. For. Res. 24: 2330-2341.
27. MULLIN, T. J., and Y. S. PARK, 1995 Stochastic simulation of population management strategies for tree breeding: a new decisionsupport tool for personal computers. Silvae Genet. 44: 132-141.
28. NAMKOONG, G., H. C. KANG and J. S. BROUARD, 1988 Tree Breeding: Principles and Strategies (Monographs on Theoretical and Applied Genetics 11). Springer-Verlag, New York.
29. RODRÍGUEZ, L. S., 2000 Balanced vs. slightly unbalanced selection. Heredity 84: 685-691.
30. ROSVALL, O., 1999 Enhancing gain from long-term forest tree breeding while conserving genetic diversity. Ph.D. Thesis, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, Umeå, Sweden.
31. ROSVALL, O., and T. J. MULLIN, 2003 Positive assortative mating with selection restrictions on group coancestry enhances gain while conserving genetic diversity in long-term forest tree breeding. Theor. Appl. Genet. 107: 629-642.
32. ROSVALL, O., D. LINDGREN and T. J. MULLIN, 1999 Sustainability robustness and efficiency of a multi-generation breeding strategy based on within-family clonal selection. Silvae Genet. 47: 307-321.
33. ROSVALL, O., T. J. MULLIN and D. LINDGREN, 2003 Controlling parent contributions during positive assortative mating and selection increases gain in long-term forest tree breeding. For. Genet. 10: 35-53.
34. RUOTSALAINEN, S., and D. LINDGREN, 2000 Stratified sublining: a new option for structuring breeding populations. Can. J. For. Res. 30: 596-604.
35. RUSSELL, J. H., and J. A. LOO-DINKINS, 1993 Distribution of testing effort in cloned genetic tests. Silvae Genet. 42: 98-104.
36. SHAW, D. V., and J. V. HOOD, 1985 Maximizing gain per effort by using clonal replicates in genetic tests. Theor. Appl. Genet. 71: 392-399.
37. SHEPHERD, R. K., and B. P. KINGHORN, 1998 A tactical approach to the design of crossbreeding programs. Proceedings of the 6th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Armidale, Australia, Vol. 25, pp. 431-438.
38. WEI, R.-P., and D. LINDGREN, 1995 Optimal family contributions and a linear approximation. Theor. Popul. Biol. 48: 318-332.
39. WILLIAMS, C. G., and O. SAVOLAINEN, 1996 Inbreeding depression in conifers: implications for breeding strategy. For. Sci. 42: 102-117.
40. WOOLLIAMS, J. A., and R. Thompson, 1994 A theory of genetic contributions. Proceedings of the 5th World Congress on Genetics Applied to Livestock Production, Guelph, Ontario, Canada, Vol. 19, pp. 127-134.