Understanding when location-hiding using overlay networks is feasible

Computer Networks

Volumn 50, Issue 6, 2006, Pages 763-780

  Wang, Ju ^a,b   Chien, Andrew A ^a,c,d  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b Ask Jeeves Inc   (United States)

^c Department of Computer Science and Engineering ^*

^d UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

Correlated vulnerabilities; Location hiding; Overlay network; Penetration attack; Proxy network; Security

Indexed keywords

CORRELATED VULNERABILITIES; LOCATION-HIDING; OVERLAY NETWORKS; PENETRATION ATTACK; PROXY NETWORKS;

COMPUTER SYSTEMS; CORRELATION METHODS; NETWORK PROTOCOLS; SECURITY OF DATA; USER INTERFACES;

COMPUTER NETWORKS;

EID: 32544431722     PISSN: 13891286     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.comnet.2005.07.022     Document Type: Article

References (24)

1. D. Adkins et al., Towards a More Functional and Secure Network Infrastructure, Computer Science Division, UC Berkeley, Berkeley, 2003.
2. D. Adkins et al., Taming IP packet flooding attacks, in: HotNets-II, 2003.
3. D.G. Andersen, Mayday: distributed filtering for Internet services, in: 4th Usenix Symposium on Internet Technologies and Systems, Seattle, WA, 2003.
4. A.D. Keromytis, V. Misra, and D. Rubenstein SOS: secure overlay services ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communications (SIGCOMM) 2002 ACM Pittsburgh, PA
5. Akamai, Akamai Technology Overview, Available from: .
6. T. Hinrikus, Skype application programming interface, 2004, Available from: .
7. B. Cohen, Incentives build robustness in BitTorrent, 2003, Available from: .
8. W.A. Arbaugh, W.L. Fithen, and J. McHugh Windows of vulnerability: a case study analysis IEEE Comput. 33 2000 52 59
9. H.K. Browne et al., A trend analysis of exploitations, in: Proceedings of the 2001 IEEE Symposium on Security and Privacy, 2001.
10. B. Littlewood Predicting software reliability Phil. Trans. R. Soc. 327 1989 513 527
11. E.N. Adams Optimizing preventive service of software products IBM J. Res. Develop. 28 1 1984 2 14
12. Microsoft, Microsoft Security Bulletin, 2004, Microsoft Corporation, Available from: .
13. R. Lippmann The 1999 DARPA Off-Line Intrusion Detection Evaluation 2000 MIT Lincoln Lab
14. R.P. Lippmann et al., Evaluating intrusion detection systems: the 1998 DARPA off-line intrusion detection evaluation, in: Proceedings of the 2000 DARPA Information Survivability Conference and Exposition, 2000.
15. J. Wang, X. Liu, A.A. Chien, Empirical study of tolerating Denial-of-Service attacks with a proxy network, in: USENIX Security Symposium'05, 2005.
16. A. Sherman et al., ACMS: the Akamai configuration management system, in: The 2nd Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation (USENIX NSDI05), 2005.
17. HP Open View-Computer and Network Management, Available from: .
18. J. Wang, L. Lu, and A.A. Chien Tolerating Denial-of-Service attacks using overlay networks-impact of topology 2003 ACM Workshop on Survivable and Self-Regenerative Systems 2003 ACM Washington, DC
19. I. Stoica et al., Chord: a scalable Peer-to-Peer lookup service for Internet applications, in: ACM Special Interest Group on Data Communications (SIGCOMM), 2001.
20. D.M. Nicol, M. Liljenstam, Models of Internet worm defense, Coordinated Science Laboratory, Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign, 2004.
21. D.L. Chaum Untraceable electronic mail, return addresses, and digital pseudonyms Commun. ACM 24 2 1981 84 90
22. M.G. Reed, P.F. Syverson, D.M. Goldschlag, Anonymous connections and Onion Routing, IEEE J. Select. Areas Commun., Special Issue on Copyright and Privacy Protection, 1998.
23. M.J. Freedman et al., Introducing Tarzan, a Peer-to-Peer anonymizing network layer, in: 1st International Workshop in Peer-to-Peer Systems (IPTPS'02), Cambridge, MA, 2002.
24. S. Elnikety Pasta: Anonymous Peer-to-Peer Email System 2002 Rice University