Step and pulse response methods for identification of Wiener processes

AIChE Journal

Volumn 52, Issue 2, 2006, Pages 668-677

  Park, Ho Cheol ^a   Lee, Jietae ^a  

^a Kyungpook National University   (South Korea)

Author keywords

Identification; Pulse response; Relay feedback; Step response; Wiener type nonlinear process

Indexed keywords

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; SQUARE WAVE GENERATORS; STEP RESPONSE;

IDENTIFICATION; PULSE RESPONSE; RELAY FEEDBACK; WIENER-TYPE NONLINEAR PROCESS;

LINEARIZATION;

COMPUTER SIMULATION; GRAPHIC METHODS; LEAST SQUARES APPROXIMATIONS; LINEARIZATION; NONLINEAR CONTROL SYSTEMS; SQUARE WAVE GENERATORS; STEP RESPONSE;

EID: 32444449394     PISSN: 00011541     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1002/aic.10690     Document Type: Article

References (22)

1. Haber R, Unbehauen H. Structure identification of nonlinear dynamic systems - a survey on input/output approaches. Automatica. 1990;26: 651-677.
2. Zhu Y. Estimation of an N-L-N Hammerstein-Wiener model. Automatica. 2002;38:1607-1614.
3. Kalafatis A, Arifin N, Wang L, Cluett WR. A new approach to the identification of pH process based on the Wiener model. Chem Eng Sci. 1995;50:3693-3701.
4. Vörös J. Parameter identification of Wiener systems with discontinuous nonlinearities. Systems & Control Letters. 2001;44:363-372.
5. Pottmann M, Unbehauen H, Seborg DE. Application of a general multi-model approach for identification of highly nonlinear processes - a case study. Int J Control. 1993;57:97-120.
6. Bai E. An optimal two-step identification algorithm for HammersteinWiener nonlinear systems. Automatica. 1998;34:333-338.
7. Sung SW. System identification method for Hammerstein processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2002;41:4295-4302.
8. Balestrino A, Landi A, Ould-Zmirli M, Sani L. Automatic nonlinear auto-tuning method for Hammerstein modeling of electrical drives. IEEE Trans Ind Electron. 2001;48:645-655.
9. Park HC, Koo DG, Youn JH, Lee J, Sung SW. Relay feedback approaches for the identification of Hammerstein-type nonlinear processes. Ind Eng Chem Res. 2004;43:735-740.
10. Luyben WL, Eskinat E. Nonlinear auto-tune identification. Int J Control. 1994;59:595-626.
11. Henson MA, Seborg DE. Nonlinear Process Control. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1997.
12. Huang H, Lee M, Tang Y. Identification of Wiener model using relay feedback test. J Chem Eng of Japan. 1998;31:604-612.
13. th IFAC Symposium on Dynamics and Control of Process Systems, Jejudo Island, Korea, 2001:748-753.
14. Sung SW, Lee J. Modeling and control of Wiener-type processes. Chem Eng Sci. 2004;59:1515-1521.
15. Bai E. Frequency domain identification of Wiener models. Automatica. 2003;39:1521-1530.
16. Ljung L. System Identification-Theory for the User. 2nd ed. New Jersey: Prentice-Hall; 1999.
17. Mills PM, Zomaya AY, Tade MO. Neuro-Adaptive Process Control: A Practical Approach. New York: Wiley; 1993.
18. Åström KJ, Hägglund T. PID Controllers. 2nd ed. Research Triangle Park, NC: ISA; 1998.
19. Seborg DE, Edgar TF, Mellichamp DA. Process Dynamics and Control. 2nd ed. New York: Wiley; 2004.
20. Park HC. Simple Approaches for the Identification of Wiener and Hammerstein-Wiener Nonlinear Processes. PhD Thesis, Kyungpook National University, Daegu, Korea, 2004.
21. Wright RA, Kravaris C. Nonlinear control of pH process using the strong acid equivalent. Ind Eng Chem Res. 1991;30:1561-1572.
22. Lee J, Lee SD, Kwon YS, Park S. Relay feedback method for tuning of nonlinear pH control system. AIChE J. 1993;30:1093-1096.