Cytological versus histopathological diagnosis in canine osteosarcoma [7]

Veterinary Record

Volumn 157, Issue 24, 2005, Pages 784-

  Loukopoulos, P ^a   Rozmanec, M ^a   Sutton, R H ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF QUEENSLAND   (Australia)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CONTROLLED STUDY; CYTODIAGNOSIS; DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY; DIAGNOSTIC PROCEDURE; DIAGNOSTIC TEST; DIAGNOSTIC VALUE; DOG; HISTOPATHOLOGY; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; LABORATORY DIAGNOSIS; LETTER; NONHUMAN; OSTEOSARCOMA; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY; TUMOR DIFFERENTIATION;

CANIS FAMILIARIS;

EID: 32444432750     PISSN: 00424900     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1136/vr.157.24.784     Document Type: Letter

References (4)

1. COHEN, M., BOHLING, M. W., WRIGHT, J. C., WELLES, E. A. & SPANO, J. S. (2003) Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of cytologic examination: 269 cases (1999-2000). Journal of the American Veterinary Medical Association 222, 964-967
2. DE LORENZI, D., BONFANTI, U., MASSERDOTTI, C. & TRANQUILLO, M. (2005) Fine-needle biopsy of external ear canal masses in the cat: cytologic results and histologic correlations in 27 cases. Veterinary Clinical Pathology 34, 100-105
3. DODD, L. G., SCULLY, S. P., COTHRAN, R. L. & HARRELSON, J. M. (2002) Utility of fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of primary osteosarcoma. Diagnostic Cytopathology 27, 350-353
4. MILLS, J. N. & GRIFFITHS, G. L. (1984) The accuracy of clinical diagnoses by fine-needle aspiration cytology. Australian Veterinary Journal 61, 269-271