Toxicity reduction evaluation, toxicity identification evaluation and toxicity tracking in direct toxicity assessment

Ecotoxicology

Volumn 13, Issue 5, 2004, Pages 475-484

  Hutchings, Matt ^a   Johnson, Ian ^b   Hayes, Elaine ^b   Girling, Andrew E ^c   Thain, John ^d   Thomas, Kevin ^d   Benstead, Rachel ^e   Whale, Graham ^f   Wordon, Joy ^f   Maddox, Ruth ^e   Chown, Phillip ^c  

^a ASTRAZENECA   (United Kingdom)

^b Medmenham Marlow B   (United Kingdom)

^c N Ln S St Boughton under B ^*  (United Kingdom)

^d CENTRE FOR ENVIRONMENT   (United Kingdom)

^e ENVIRONMENT AGENCY   (United Kingdom)

^f SHELL GLOBAL SOLUTIONS INTERNATIONAL B V   (United States)

Author keywords

cyanide; OP insecticide; TIE; toxicity tracking; TRE

Indexed keywords

CYANIDE; DIMPYLATE; INDUSTRIAL EFFLUENT; ORGANOPHOSPHATE PESTICIDE; PESTICIDE; TOXIC SUBSTANCE;

CYANIDE; ECOTOXICOLOGY; EFFLUENT; IDENTIFICATION METHOD; TOXICITY TEST;

ARTICLE; CHEMICAL ANALYSIS; ECOTOXICITY; EFFLUENT; ESTUARY; EVALUATION; GAS CHROMATOGRAPHY; MASS SPECTROMETRY; NONHUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RIVER; TECHNIQUE; TOXICITY TESTING;

ANIMALS; CYANIDES; DAPHNIA; DIAZINON; ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING; INSECTICIDES; RISK ASSESSMENT; SCOTLAND; SEWAGE; TOXICITY TESTS; WASTE DISPOSAL, FLUID; WATER POLLUTANTS, CHEMICAL;

EID: 3242886084     PISSN: 09639292     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:ECTX.0000035297.90620.73     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Amato, J.R., Mount, D.I., Durhan, E.J., Lukasewycz, M.T., Ankley, G.T. and Robert, E.D. (1992). An example of the identification of diazinon as a primary toxicant in an effluent. Environ. Toxico. Chem. 11, 209-16.
2. Amodei, M. and Azzoni, R. (1991). Use of Daphnia magna in detecting drinking water emergencies. Quad. Ist. Ric. Acque. 93, 1-10.
3. APEM (1997). The Impact of Langholm Effluent Treatment Works Discharge on the Fish Populations of the River Border Esk. Aquatic Pollution and Environmental Management, Report 445/DC-H/esl. London, UK.
4. ENTEC (1996). UK DTA Demonstration Programme Phase 1: Project Plan - River Esk. ENTEC Report No. 98025. London, UK.
5. Environment Agency (1997). Study to Determine the Toxicity of Mixtures of Chlorfenviphos, Diazinon and Propetamphos to Juvenile (< 24 hour Old) Daphnia magna after a 48 hour Period. R&D Technical Report G14. Environment Agency, Bristol, UK.
6. Matthiessen, P., Thain, J.E., Law R. and Fileman, T.W. (1993). Attempts to assess the environmental hazard posed by complex mixtures of organic chemicals in UK estuaries. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 26, 90-5.
7. Mount, D.I. and Anderson-Carnahan, D.M. (1988). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations. Phase I. Toxicity Characterisation Procedures. EPA/600/3-88/034. US EPA, Duluth, MN, USA.
8. Schimmel, S.C., Garnas, R.L., Patrick, J.M. Jr. and Moore, J.C. (1983). Acute toxicity, bioconcentration, and persistence of AC 222,705, benthiocarb, chlorpyrifos, fenvalerate, methyl parathion, and permethrin in the estuarine environment. J. Agric. Food Chem. 31, 104-13.
9. UKWIR (2000a). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Lower Tees Estuary Project Part I. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/03. London, UK.
10. UKWIR (2000b). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Lower Tees Estuary Project Part II (2000). Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/04. London, UK.
11. UKWIR (2000c). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Review of Toxicity Reduction Evaluations at Sewage Treatment Works. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/05. London, UK.
12. UKWIR (2000d). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: River Esk Project. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/02. London, UK.
13. UKWIR (2000e). UK Direct Toxicity Assessment (DTA) Demonstration Programme: Technical Guidance. Report Reference No. 00/TX/02/07. London, UK.
14. US EPA (1991). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase I Toxicity Characterisation Procedures. EPA Report EPA-600/6-91/003. US EPA, Duluth, MN, USA.
15. US EPA (1993a). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase II Toxicity Characterisation Procedures for Acutely and Chronically Toxic Samples. EPA Report EPA-600/R-92/080. US Environmental Protection Agency, Duluth, MN, USA.
16. US EPA (1993b). Methods for Aquatic Toxicity Identification Evaluations: Phase III Toxicity Characterisation Procedures for Acutely and Chronically Toxic Samples. EPA Report EPA-600/R-92/081. US EPA, Duluth, MN,\ USA.
17. US EPA (1999). Toxicity Reduction Evaluation Guidance for Municipal Wastewater Treatment Plans. Office of Wastewater Management. US EPA, Washington, DC, USA.