|
|
|
Volumn 39, Issue 2, 2002, Pages 529-566
|
|
Infanticide or civil rights for women: did the Supreme Court go too far in Stenberg v. Carhart?
a
a
NONE
|
|
Author keywords
[No Author keywords available]
|
|
Indexed keywords
ARTICLE;
CARHART V. STENBERG;
DOE V. BOLTON;
FEMALE;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
GOVERNMENT;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HUMAN;
INDUCED ABORTION;
JURISPRUDENCE;
LEGAL APPROACH;
LEGAL ASPECT;
MEDICAL ETHICS;
MEDICOLEGAL ASPECT;
METHODOLOGY;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
PREGNANCY;
ROE V. WADE;
SECOND TRIMESTER PREGNANCY;
UNITED STATES;
WEBSTER V. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
CARHART V. STENBERG;
DOE V. BOLTON;
GENETICS AND REPRODUCTION;
LEGAL APPROACH;
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA V. CASEY;
ROE V. WADE;
WEBSTER V. REPRODUCTIVE HEALTH SERVICES;
ABORTION, INDUCED;
FEDERAL GOVERNMENT;
FEMALE;
GOVERNMENT REGULATION;
HIPPOCRATIC OATH;
HUMANS;
LEGISLATION, MEDICAL;
NEBRASKA;
PREGNANCY;
PREGNANCY TRIMESTER, SECOND;
STATE GOVERNMENT;
SUPREME COURT DECISIONS;
UNITED STATES;
WOMEN'S RIGHTS;
|
|
EID: 3242883795
PISSN: 00186694
EISSN: None
Source Type: Journal
DOI: None Document Type: Article |
|
Times cited : (2)
|
|
References (0)
|
