The divergent worlds of new media: How policy s hapes work in the creative economy

Review of Policy Research

Volumn 21, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 543-558

  Christopherson, Susan ^a  

^a Department of Obstetrics Gynecology   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

CULTURE; MEDIA INDUSTRY; POLICY ANALYSIS; SERVICE SECTOR;

NORTH AMERICA; UNITED STATES;

EID: 3242879151     PISSN: 1541132X     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-1338.2004.00093.x     Document Type: Article

References (43)

1. Amman, J. (2002). Union and the new economy: Motion picture and television "Unions offer a model for new media professionals." Working USA (Fall), 112-130.
2. Augusstson, F., & Sandberg, A. (2004). Interactive media, work and organisation in Sweden. Paper presented at an International Workshop: Studying New Forms of Work: Concepts and Practices in Cultural Industries and Beyond, Freie Universitat Berlin, March 26-27.
3. Batt, R., Christopherson, S., Rightor, N., & Van Jaarsveld, D. (2001 . Net working: Work patterns and workforce policies for the new media industry. Washington, DC: Economic Policy Institute.
4. Betzelt, S., & Gottschall, K. (2004). Publishing and the new media professions as forerunners of pioneer work and life patterns. In J. Z. Giele & E. Holst (Eds.). Changing life patterns in Western Industrial societies (pp. 257-280). London: Elsevier.
5. Brail, S. (1998). New media in old urban areas: The emergence and evolution of Toronto's multimedia cluster. PhD dissertation, University of Toronto, Canada.
6. Christopherson, S. (1996). Industrial relations in an international industry, film production. In L. Gray & R. Seeber (Eds.). Under the stars, industrial relations in the entertainment media industries. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
7. Christopherson, S. (2002a). Project work in context: Regulatory change and the new geography of media." Environment and Planning A, 34, 2003-2015.
8. Christopherson, S. (2002b). Why do national labor market practices continue to diverge in a global economy. Economic Geography, 48, 1-20.
9. Croteau, D., & Hoynes, W. (2001). The business of media, corporate media and the public interest. Thousand Oaks: Pine Forge Press.
10. DeFillippi, R. J., & Arthur, M. (1998). Paradox in project-based enterprise: The case of film-making. California Management Review, 40, 125-139.
11. du Gay, P. (1996). Consumption and identity at work. London: Sage.
12. du Gay, P. (1997). Organizing identity: Making up people at work. In P. du Gay (Ed.) Production of culture/Cultures of production (pp. 2-20). London: Sage.
13. European Commission. (1997). Youth in the European Union. Brussels: Author.
14. Feigenbaum, H. B. (1998). Regulating the media in the United States and France. Journal of Arts Management, and Society, 27(4), 283-285.
15. Gill, R. (2002). Cool, creative and egalitarian? Exploring gender in project-based new media work in Europe. Information, Communication & Society, 5(l), 70-89.
16. Grabber, G. (2002). Cool project, boring institutions: Temporary collaboration in social context. Regional Studies, 36(3), 205-214.
17. Hall, P., & Soskice, D. (2001). Varieties of capitalism, the institutional foundations of comparative advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
18. Indergaard, M. (2002). The bullriders of Silicon Alley: New media circuits of innovation, speculation, and urban development. In J. Eade & C. Mele (Eds.). Understanding the city: Contemporary and future perspectives (pp. 339-362). Oxford: Blackwell.
19. Katz, H., & Darbishire, O. (2000). Converging divergences, worldwide changes in employment systems. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.
20. Kotamraju, N. (2002). Keeping up: Web design skill and the reinvented worker. Information, Communication & Society, 5(1), 1-26.
21. Laepple, D., Thiel, J., Wixforth, J., Menze, A., & Rathjen, J. (2002). Chancen und risken in neuen arbeitsfeldern der informations-gesellchaft: das beispiel der multimediabranche. [Chance and risk in new work fields in the information society: the case of multi-media: Zwischenbericht: Hamburg.
22. Lash, S., & Wittel, A. (2002). Shifting new media: From content to consultancy, from heterarchy to hierarchy. Environment and Planning A, 34(11), 1985-2002.
23. Leicht, K., & Fennel, M. (2001). Professional work, A sociological approach. Oxford: Blackwell.
24. Mayer-Ahuja, N., & Wolf, H. (2004). Work and knowledge in the Internet industry: The German case. Paper presented at an International Workshop: Studying New Forms of Work: Concepts and Practices in Cultural Industries and Beyond, Freie Universitat, Berlin, March 26-27.
25. McChesney, R. (1999). Rich media, poor democracy. New York: New Press.
26. McRobbie, A. (1998). British fashion design: Rag trade or image industry? London: Routledge.
27. McRobbie, A. (2002). From Holloway to Hollywood: Happiness at work in the new cultural economy. In P. DuGay & M. Pryke (Eds.). Cultural economy (pp. 97-114). London: Sage.
28. Powell, W. W. (1990). Neither market nor hierarchy: Network forms of organization. In B. M. Staw & L. L. Cummings (Eds.). Research in organizational Behavior 12 (l295-336). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
29. Pratt, A. (2000). New media, the new economy and new spaces. Geoforum, 31.
30. Rantisi, N. (2002). The local innovation system as a source of variety: Openness and adaptability in New York City's garment industry. Regional, Studies, 36, 587-602.
31. Ross, A. (1998). Jobs in cyberspace. In Real love, in pursuit of cultural justice. New York: New York University Press.
32. Sandberg, A. (1998). New media in Sweden. Stockholm:l National Institute for Working Life.
33. Sandberg, A. (2002) Interactive media in Sweden: The second interactive media, Internet and multimedia industry survey. Stockholm: National Institute for Working Life.
34. Scott, A. (1998, March). Multimedia and digital effects: An emerging local labor market. Monthly Labor Review, 30-37.
35. Scaott, A. (2000). The cultural economy of cities. London: Sage.
36. Staber, U. H., & Sydow, J. (2002). Organizational adaptive capacity: A structuration perspective. Journal of Management Inquiry, 11(4), 408-424.
37. Stone, K. V. W. (1992). The legacy of industrial pluralism: The tension between individual employment rights and the new deal collective bargaining system, The University of Chicago Law Review.
38. Stone, K. V. W. (2001).The new psychological contract: Implications of the changing workplace for labor and employment law. UCLA Law Review, 48(2), 519-659.
39. Sydow, J., & Staber, U. (2002). The institutional embeddedness of project networks: The case of content production in German television. Regional Studies, 36(3), 215-227.
40. Sydow, J., & Windeler, A. (1998). Organizing and evaluating interfirm networks: A structurationist perspective on network processes and effectiveness. Organization Science, 9(3), 265-284.
41. Urey, G. (2002). Labour and new media. In L. Lievrouw & S. Livingstone (Eds.). The handbook of new media. London: Sage.
42. Van Jaarsveld, D. (2003). Labor policy and new media. Dissertation, Cornell University School of Industrial and Labor Relations, Ithaca, New York.
43. Windeler, A., & Sydow, J. (2001). Project networks and changing industry practices: Collaborative content production in the German television industry. Organization Studies, 22, 1035-1060.