The Duncker illusion: Intersubject variability, brief exposure, and the role of eye movements in its generation

Investigative Ophthalmology and Visual Science

Volumn 45, Issue 8, 2004, Pages 2867-2872

  Zivotofsky, Ari Z ^a,b  

^a BAR ILAN UNIVERSITY   (Israel)

^b NATIONAL EYE INSTITUTE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; DUNCKER ILLUSION; EXPOSURE; EYE MOVEMENT; HUMAN; HUMAN EXPERIMENT; MOTION; MOVEMENT PERCEPTION; NORMAL HUMAN; PRIORITY JOURNAL; VISUAL ILLUSION; VISUAL SYSTEM;

EYE MOVEMENTS; HUMANS; ILLUSIONS; MOTION PERCEPTION; OBSERVER VARIATION; PSYCHOMOTOR PERFORMANCE;

EID: 3242876554     PISSN: 01460404     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1167/iovs.04-0031     Document Type: Article

References (25)

1. Duncker K. Uber induzierts Bewegung. Psychologische Forschung, 1929;12:180-259 (Translated and condensed as: Induced motion. In: Ellis WD, ed. A Source Book on Gestalt Psychology, New York: Humanities Press; 1967.
2. Duncker K. Uber induzierts Bewegung. Psychologische Forschung, 1929;12:180-259 (Translated and condensed as: Induced motion. In: Ellis WD, ed. A Source Book on Gestalt Psychology, New York: Humanities Press; 1967.
3. Zivotofsky AZ, Averbuch-Heller L, Thomas CW, Das VE, Discenna AO, Leigh RJ. Tracking of illusory target motion: differences between gaze and head responses. Vision Res. 1995;35:3029-3035.
4. Fischer MH, Kornmüller AE. Optokinetic ausgeloste Bewegungswahrnehmungen und optokinetisher Nystagmus. J Psychol Neurol (Leipzig). 1930;41:273-308.
5. Brandt T, Dichgans J, Koenig E. Differential effects of central versus peripheral vision on egocentric and exocentric motion perception. Exp Brain Res. 1973;16:476-491.
6. Zivotofsky AZ, Rottach KG, Averbuch-Heller L, et al. Saccades to remembered targets: the effects of smooth pursuit and illusory stimulus motion. J Neurophysiol. 1996;76:3617-3632.
7. Post RB, Chaderjian M. The sum of induced and real motion is not a straight path. Percept Psychophys. 1988;43:121-124.
8. Post RB, Chi D, Heckmann T, Chaderjian M. A reevaluation of the effect of velocity on induced motion. Percept Psychophys. 1989;45:411-416.
9. Royden CS, Crowell JA, Banks MS. Estimating heading during eye movements. Vision Res. 1994;34:3197-3214.
10. van den Berg AV, Beintema JA, Frens MA. Heading and path percepts from visual flow and eye pursuit signals. Vision Res. 2001;41:3467-3486.
11. Nakamura S, Shimojo S, A slowly moving foreground can capture an observer's self-motion: a report of a new motion illusion: inverted vection. Vision Res. 2000;40:2915-2923.
12. Hays AV, Richmond BJ, Optican LM. A UNIX-based multiple process system for real-time data acquisition and control. WESCON Conference Proceedings. 1982;2:1-10.
13. Coren S, Girgus JS. A comparison of five methods of illusion measurement. Behav Res Methods Instrum. 1972;4:240-244.
14. McKelvie SJ. Effect of psychophysical method on measurement of the Müller-Lyer illusion. Percept Mot Skills. 1984;58:822.
15. Lown BA. Quantification of the Müller-Lyer illusion using signal detection theory. Percept Mot Skills. 1988;67:101-2.
16. Easton RD, Shor RE. Information processing analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 1975;1:231-236.
17. Easton RD, Shor RE. An experimental analysis of the Chevreul pendulum illusion. J Gen Psychol 1976;95:111-125.
18. Schrauf M, Wist ER, Ehrenstein WH. The scintillating grid illusion during smooth pursuit, stimulus motion, and brief exposure in humans. Neurosci Lett. 2000;284:126-128.
19. de Graaf B, Wertheim AH, Bles W. The Aubert-Fleischl paradox does appear in visually induced self-motion. Vision Res. 1991;31:845-849.
20. Gellman RS, Carl JR, Miles FA. Short latency ocular-following responses in man. Vis Neurosci. 1990;5:107-122.
21. Brosgole L, Cristal RM, Carpenter O. The role of eye movements in the perception of visually induced motion. Percept Psychophys. 1968;3:166-168.
22. Mateeff S, Hohnsbein J, Noack T. Dynamic visual capture: Apparent auditory motion induced by a moving visual target. Perception. 1985;14:721-727.
23. Kitajima N, Yamashita Y. Dynamic capture of sound motion by light stimuli moving in three-dimensional space. Percept Mot Skills. 1999;89:1139-1158.
24. Post RB. Induced motion considered as a visually induced oculogyral illusion. Perception. 1986;15:131-138.
25. Bridgeman B, Klassen H. On the origin of stroboscopic induced motion. Percept Psychophys. 1983;34:149-154.