Participation behavior of bladder cancer survivors in a medical follow-up survey on quality of life in France

European Journal of Epidemiology

Volumn 19, Issue 4, 2004, Pages 313-321

  Matsuda, Tomohiro ^a,d   Marche, Hélène ^b   Grosclaude, Pascale ^c   Clement, Serge ^b  

^a UNIVERSITÉ PAUL SABATIER   (France)

^b école des Hautes Etudes en Sciences Sociales   (France)

^c Registre des Cancers du Tarn   (France)

^d NATIONAL INSTITUTE OF PUBLIC HEALTH   (Japan)

Author keywords

Bladder neoplasma; France; Patient participation; Quality of life (QOL); Questionnaire

Indexed keywords

ADULT; AGED; BLADDER CANCER; CANCER PATIENT; CANCER SURGERY; CANCER SURVIVAL; CYSTECTOMY; DEMOGRAPHY; FAMILY; FEMALE; FOLLOW UP; FRANCE; HUMAN; MALE; MOTIVATION; PATIENT ATTITUDE; PHYSICAL ACTIVITY; POPULATION RESEARCH; PSYCHOLOGICAL ASPECT; QUESTIONNAIRE; REVIEW; SEX DIFFERENCE; SOCIAL ASPECT; TREATMENT OUTCOME; WELLBEING; ARTICLE; BLADDER TUMOR; FACTORIAL ANALYSIS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; PATIENT CARE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; STATISTICAL MODEL; SURVIVOR;

AGED; CONTINUITY OF PATIENT CARE; CYSTECTOMY; FACTOR ANALYSIS, STATISTICAL; FEMALE; FRANCE; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HUMANS; LOGISTIC MODELS; MALE; PATIENT PARTICIPATION; QUALITY OF LIFE; QUESTIONNAIRES; SURVIVORS; URINARY BLADDER NEOPLASMS;

EID: 3242875718     PISSN: 03932990     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1023/B:EJEP.0000024703.54660.e5     Document Type: Review

References (31)

1. Dillman DA. Mail and internet surveys - The tailored design method, 2nd edn. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 2000.
2. Sitzia J, Wood N. Response rate in patient satisfaction research: An analysis of 210 published studies. Int J Qual Health Care 1998; 10: 311-317.
3. Hayashi M, Iwanaga T, Mitoku K, Minowa M. Getting a high response rate of sexual behavior survey among the general population in Japan: Three different methods of survey on sexual behavior. J Epidemiol 1999; 9: 107-113.
4. Olschewski M, Schulgen G, Schumacher M, Altman DG. Quality of life assessment in clinical cancer research. Br J Cancer 1994; 70: 1-5.
5. Cella DF, Tulsky DS, Gray G, et al. The functional assessment of cancer therapy scale: Development and validation of the general measure. J Clin Oncol 1993; 11: 570-579.
6. Hart S, Skinner EC, Meyerowitz BE, Boyd S, Lieskovsky G, Skinner DG. Quality of life after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer in patients with an ileal conduit, cutaneous or urethral kock pouch. J Urol 1999; 162: 77-81.
7. Ferrell BR, Dow KH, Grant M. Measurement of the quality of life in cancer survivors. Qual Life Res 1995; 4: 523-531.
8. De Melker HE, Nagelkerde NJ, Conyn-van Spaendonck MA. Non-participation in a population-based seroprevalence study of vaccine-preventable diseases. Epidemiol Infect 2000; 124: 255-262.
9. Benfante R, Reed D, MacLean C, Kagan A. Response bias in the Honolulu Heart Program. Am J Epidemiol 1989; 130: 1088-1100.
10. Hoffman SC, Burke AE, Helzlsouer KJ, Comstock GW. Controlled trial of the effect of length, incentives, and follow-up techniques on response to a mailed questionnaire. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 148: 1007-1011.
11. Chou P, Kuo HS, Chen CH, Lin HC. Characteristics of non-participants and reasons for non-participation in a population survey in Kin-Hu, Kinmen. Eur J Epidemiol 1997; 13: 195-200.
12. Mallinson S. The short-form 36 and older people: Some problems encountered when using postal administration. J Epidemiol Community Health 1998; 52: 324-328.
13. IGEO Patient compliance with quality of life questionnaires. Italian group for evaluation of outcomes in oncology (IGEO). Tumori 1999; 85: 92-95.
14. Profeta ML, Ferrante P, Porro De' Somenzi C. A survey on factors affecting acceptance of measles vaccine. Eur J Epidemiol 1986; 2: 128-133.
15. Ronmark E, Lundqvist A, Lundback B, Nystrom L. Non-responders to a postal questionnaire on respiratory symptoms and diseases. Eur J Epidemiol 1999; 15: 293-299.
16. Thorogood M, Coulter A, Jones L, Yudkin P, Muir J, Mant D. Factors affecting response to an invitation to attend for a health check. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1993; 47: 224-228.
17. Gordon DR. Embodying illness, embodying cancer. Cult Med Psychiatry 1990; 14: 275-297.
18. Berthier F, Grosclaude P, Bocquet H, Faliu B, Cayla F, Machelard-Roumagnac M. Prevalence of cancer in the elderly: Discrepancies between self-reported and registry data. Br J Cancer 1997; 75: 445-447.
19. Muzzin LJ, Anderson NJ, Figueredo AT, Gudelis SO. The experience of cancer. Soc Sci Med 1994; 38: 1201-1208.
20. Benbassat J, Pilpel D, Tidhar M. Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys. Behav Med 1998; 24: 81-88.
21. Faliu B, Berthier F, Grosclaude P, et al. Prevalence of cancer, health care and daily life assistance in people aged 75 or over living in the Tarn area (France). Bull Cancer 1997; 84: 169-174.
22. Roberts H, Pearson JC, Dengler R. Impact of a postcard versus a questionnaire as a first reminder in a postal lifestyle survey. J Epidemiol Commun Health 1993; 47: 334-335.
23. Kalantar JS, Talley NJ. The effects of lottery incentive and length of questionnaire on health survey response rates: A randomized study. J Clin Epidemiol 1999; 52: 1117-1122.
24. Rodary C, Leplege A, Hill C. Evaluation of the quality of life in clinical research in cancerology. Bull Cancer 1998; 85: 140-148.
25. Hinotsu A, Niimi M, Akaza H, et al. Development of Japanese version of QOL questionnaire for bladder and prostate cancer patients using FACT-B1 and P: Pilot study. Gan To Kagaku Ryoho 1999; 26: 657-666.
26. Fayers PM, Curran D, Machin D. Incomplete quality of life data in randomized trials: Missing items. Stat Med 1998; 17: 679-696.
27. Fairclough DL, Cella DF. Functional assessment of cancer therapy (FACT-G): Non-response to individual questions. Qual Life Res 1996; 5: 321-329.
28. The ASCF group. Analysis of sexual behaviour in France (ACSF). A comparison between two modes of investigation: Telephone survey and face-to-face survey. ASCF principal investigators and their associates. Aids 1992; 6: 315-323.
29. Eaker S, Bergstrom R, Bergstrom A, Adami HO, Nyren O. Response rate to mailed epidemiologic questionnaires: A population-based randomized trial of variations in design and mailing routines. Am J Epidemiol 1998; 147: 74-82.
30. Lund E, Gram IT. Response rate according to title and length of questionnaire. Scand J Soc Med 1998; 26: 154-160.
31. Steineck G, Bergmark K, Henningsohn L, al-Abany M, Dickman PW, Helgason A. Symptom documentation in cancer survivors as a basis for therapy modifications. Acta Oncol 2002; 41: 244-252.