Reconciling transportation corridor preservation and national environmental policy act process: Evaluation of North Carolina phased environmental approach

Transportation Research Record

Volumn , Issue 1601, 1997, Pages 21-28

  Lackey, Ann E ^a,b  

^a DUKE UNIVERSITY   (United States)

^b Chesapeake Research Consortium   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

EID: 3242844106     PISSN: 03611981     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.3141/1601-04     Document Type: Article

References (17)

1. Cohn, L. F. Environmental Action Planning for Transportation Project Development. Transportation Quarterly, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1982, pp. 503-525.
2. Deakin, E. Policy Responses in the USA. In Transport, the Environment, and Sustainable Development (D. Banister and K. Button, eds.), Chapman and Hall, London, England, 1993, pp. 79-101.
3. Maiorana, J. J. NCHRP Synthesis of Highway Practice 197: Corridor Preservation. TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1994.
4. Federal Highway Administration's Environmental Policy Statement. FHWA-RE-90-005. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1990.
5. Report of the AASHTO Task Force on Corridor Preservation. AASHTO, Washington, D.C., 1990.
6. Koch, P. Corridor Preservation Pilot Projects in North Carolina. Presented at TRB 4th National Conference of Small and Medium Communities, Duluth, Minn., May 1994.
7. Thoroughfare Plan for the Town of Wilkesboro and Town of North Wilkesboro. Statewide Planning Branch, Small Urban Planning Unit, North Carolina Department of Transportation, NCDOT, Raleigh, 1995.
8. Phase I Environmental Analysis - Asheville Urban Area. Statewide Planning Branch, Small Urban Planning Unit, Raleigh, 1993.
9. Rivkin Associates. Corridor Preservation: Techniques and Applications. Pilot Training Course 15130. Prepared for National Highway Institute and FHWA, Bethesda, Md., 1992.
10. Corridor Preservation: A Draft Status Report. North Carolina Division Office, FHWA, Raleigh, 1991.
11. Mandelker, D. R. NEPA Law and Litigation. Callaghan and Company, Willamette, Ill., 1984, updated through 1991.
12. Kussy, E. V. A. Environmental Considerations in Highway Planning. In National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), Ecosystem Analysis, and Environmental Impact Assessment, ALI-ABA Course of Study, cosponsored by the Environmental Law Institute, Washington, D.C., April 1994, pp. 257-270.
13. Guidance for Preparing and Processing Environmental and Section 4(f) Documents. FHWA Technical Advisory T6640.8A. FHWA, U.S. Department of Transportation, 1987.
14. Council on Environmental Quality. Forty Most Asked Questions Concerning CEQ's National Environmental Policy Act Regulations. Federal Register, Vol. 46, pp. 18026-18037, 1981; as amended, Federal Register, Vol. 51, p. 15618, 1986.
15. Council on Environmental Quality. Forty Most Asked Questions Concerning CEQ's National Environmental Policy Act Regulations. Federal Register, Vol. 46, pp. 18026-18037, 1981; as amended, Federal Register, Vol. 51, p. 15618, 1986.
16. Hess, K. J., and L. E. Pesesky. Integrating Major Metropolitan Transportation Investment Study Process with National Environmental Policy Act Process. In Transportation Research Record 1475, TRB, National Research Council, Washington, D.C., 1995, pp. 50-56.
17. Conley, M. R., and G. J. Odegard. NEPA, the FERC, and Tiering: Lessons from the Process Gone Astray. In Changing and Innovative Strategies for Environmental Protection: Proc., 1992 Conference of the National Association of Environmental Professionals, Seattle, Wash. May 1992, pp. 71-78.