Rehabilitation in limb deficiency. 1. Gait and motion analysis

Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation

Volumn 77, Issue 3 SUPPL., 1996, Pages

  Czerniecki, Joseph M ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL OF MEDICINE   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ABOVE KNEE AMPUTATION; ADAPTATION; BELOW KNEE AMPUTATION; BIOMECHANICS; DISABLED PERSON; GAIT; HUMAN; LIMB DEFECT; LIMB PROSTHESIS; REVIEW; TREATMENT PLANNING;

ADAPTATION, PHYSIOLOGICAL; AMPUTATION; ARTIFICIAL LIMBS; BIOMECHANICS; ENERGY METABOLISM; GAIT; HUMANS; PHYSICAL MEDICINE; PROSTHESIS FITTING;

EID: 3242830857     PISSN: 00039993     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/s0003-9993(96)90236-1     Document Type: Article

References (36)

1. Czerniecki JM. Foot and ankle biomechanics in walking and running: a review. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1988;67:246-52.
2. Dillingham TR, Lehmann JF, Price R: Effect of lower limb on body propulsion. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1992;73:647-51.
3. Inman VT. Conservation of energy in ambulation. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1967;48:484-8.
4. Lehmann JF. Gait analysis: diagnosis and management. In: Kottke FJ, Stillwell GK, Lehmann JF, editors. Krusen's handbook of physical medicine and rehabilitation. Philadelphia: Saunders 1982;86-101.
5. Kram R, Taylor CR. Energetics of running: a new perspective. Nature 1990;346:265-7.
6. Heglund NC, Fedak MA, Taylor CR, Cavagna GA. Energetics and mechanics of terrestrial locomotion: IV. Total mechanical energy changes as a function of speed and body size in birds and mammals. J Exp Biol 1982;97:57-66.
7. Winter DA. Biomechanics and motor control of human movement. New York: Wiley, 1990;115-9.
8. Winter DA, Sienko SE. Biomechanics of below-knee amputee gait. J Biomech 1988;21:361-7.
9. Gitter A, Czerniecki JM, DeGroot DM. Biomechanical analysis of the influence of prosthetic feet on below-knee amputee walking. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1991;70:142-8.
10. Colborne GR, Naumann S, Lonmuir PE, Berbrayer D. Analysis of mechanical and metabolic factors in the gait of congenital below knee amputees: a comparison of the SACH and Seattle Feet. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:272-8.
11. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A. Insights into amputee running: a muscle work analysis. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1992;71:209-18.
12. Czerniecki JM, Gitter AJ, Beck JC. Energy transfer mechanisms as a compensatory strategy in below knee amputee runners. J Biomech (in press).
13. Martin PE, Heise GD, Morgan DW. Interrelationships between mechanical power, energy transfers, and walking and running economy. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1993;25:508-15.
14. Williams KR, Cavanagh PR. A model for the calculation of mechanical power during distance running. J Biomech 1983;16:115-28.
15. Williams KR. The relationship between mechanical and physiological energy estimates. Med Sci Sports Exerc 1985;17:317-25.
16. Gitter AJ, Czerniecki JM. A reassessment of center of mass dynamics as a determinant of the metabolic inefficiency of above knee amputee ambulation. Am J Phys Med Rehabil (in press).
17. Macfarlane PA, Nielsen DH, Shurr DG, Meier K. Perception of walking difficulty by below-knee amputees using a conventional foot versus the Flex-Foot. J Prosthet Orthot 1991;3:114-9.
18. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A, Questad K. Comprehensive analysis of dynamic elastic response feet: Seattle Ankle/ Lite Foot versus SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:853-61.
19. Lehmann JF, Price R, Boswell-Bessette S, Dralle A Questad K, deLateur BJ. Conprehensive analysis of energy storing prosthetic feet: Flex Foot and Seattle foot versus standard SACH foot. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1993;74:1225-31.
20. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A, Munro C. Joint moment and muscle power output characteristics of below knee amputees during running: the influence of energy storing prosthetic feet. J Biomech 1991;24:63-75.
21. Torburn L, Schweiger GP, Perry J, Powers CM. Below-knee amputee gait in stair climbing: a comparison of stride characteristics using five different prosthetic feet. Clin Orthop 1994;303:185-92.
22. Lemaire ED, Fisher R. Osteoarthritis and elderly amputee gait. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:1094-9.
23. Engsberg JR, Lee AG, Tedford KG, Harder JA. Normative ground reaction force data for able-bodied and trans-tibial amputee children during running. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17:83-9.
24. Engsberg JR, Lee AG, Patterson JL, Harder JA. External loading comparisons between able-bodied and below-knee-amputee children during walking. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1991;72:657-61.
25. Barth DG, Schumacher L, Sienko-Thomas S. Gait analysis and energy cost of below knee amputees wearing six different prosthetic feet. J Prosthet Orthot 1992;4:63-75.
26. Powers CM, Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E. Influence of prosthetic foot design on sound limb loading in adults with unilateral below-knee amputations. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1994;75:825-9.
27. Flandry F, Beskin J, Chambers RB, Perry J, Waters RL, Chavez R. The effect of the CAT-CAM above-knee prosthetic on functional rehabilitation. Clin Orthop 1989;239:249-62.
28. Esquanazi A. Analysis of prosthetic gait. Phys Med Rehabil: State of the Art Rev 1994;8(1):201-20.
29. Fernie GR. Biomechanics of gait and prosthetic alignment. In: Kostuik JP, editor. Amputation surgery and rehabilitation, the Toronto experience. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 1981; 259-65.
30. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A: Cardiac rehabilitation in the lower-extremity amputee. Phys Med Rehabil Clin North Am 1995;6(2):311-30.
31. Molen NH. Energy/speed relation of below-knee amputees walking on a motor-driven treadmill. Int Z Angewandte Physiol 1973;31:173-85.
32. Waters RL, Perry J, Antonelli D, Hislop H. Energy cost of walking of amputees: the influence of level of amputation. J Bone Joint Surg 1976;58-A:42-6.
33. Torburn L, Perry J, Ayyappa E, Shanfield SL. Below-knee amputee gait with dynamic clastic response prosthetic feet: a pilot study. J Rehabil Res Devel 1990;27:369-84.
34. Nielsen DH, Shurr DG, Golden JC, Meier K. Comparison of energy cost and gait efficiency during ambulation in below-knee amputees using different prosthetic feet: a preliminary report J Prosthet Orthot 1988;1:24-31.
35. Czerniecki JM, Gitter A, Weaver K. Effect of alterations in prosthetic shank mass on the metabolic costs of ambulation in above-knee amputees. Am J Phys Med Rehabil 1994;73:348-52.
36. Gailey RS, Lawrence D, Burditt C, Spyropoulos P, Newell C, Nash MS. The CAT-CAM socket and quadrilateral socket: a comparison of energy cost during ambulation. Prosthet Orthot Int 1993;17:95-100.