Endorectal magnetic resonance imaging for staging of prostatic cancer

Acta Urologica Japonica

Volumn 42, Issue 10, 1996, Pages 767-773

  Hayashi, Norio ^a   Kawamura, Juichi ^a   Sugimura, Yoshiki ^b  

^a MIE UNIVERSITY   (Japan)

^b AICHI CANCER CENTER HOSPITAL   (Japan)

Author keywords

Endorectal MRI; Localized prostatic carcinoma

Indexed keywords

DIAGNOSTIC AGENT; DRUG DERIVATIVE; GADOLINIUM PENTETATE; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUND; PENTETIC ACID;

ARTICLE; CANCER INVASION; CANCER STAGING; HUMAN; MALE; METHODOLOGY; NUCLEAR MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; PATHOLOGY; PREDICTION AND FORECASTING; PROSTATE TUMOR; PROSTATECTOMY; RETROSPECTIVE STUDY; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

GADOLINIUM DTPA; HUMANS; MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING; MALE; NEOPLASM INVASIVENESS; NEOPLASM STAGING; ORGANOMETALLIC COMPOUNDS; PENTETIC ACID; PREDICTIVE VALUE OF TESTS; PROSTATECTOMY; PROSTATIC NEOPLASMS; RETROSPECTIVE STUDIES; SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY;

EID: 3242818204     PISSN: 00181994     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: None     Document Type: Article

References (21)

1. Catalona WJ and Stein AJ: Staging errors in clinically localized prostatic cancer. J Urol 127: 452-456, 1982
2. Walsh PC and Lepor H: The role of radical prostatectomy in the management of prostatic cancer. Cancer 60: 526-537, 1987
3. 1. Radiology 169: 339-346, 1988
4. Scardino PT, Shinohara K, Wheeler TM, et al.: Staging of prostate cancer: value of ultrasonography. Urol Clin North Am 16: 713-734, 1989
5. Rifkin MD, Zerhouni EA, Gatsonis CA, et al.: Comparison of magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasonography in staging early prostate cancer. N Engl J Med 323: 621-626, 1990
6. Andriole GL, Coplen DE, Mikkelsen DJ, et al.: Staging of prostate cancer : value of ultrasonography. Urol Clin North Am 16: 713-734, 1989
7. Presti JC Jr, Hricak H, Narayan PA, et al. : Local staging of prostatic carcinoma : Comparison of transrectal sonography and endorectal MR imaging. AJR 166: 103-108, 1996
8. Schiebler ML, Schnall MD, Pollack HM, et al.: Current role of MR imaging in the staging of adenocarcinoma of the prostate. Radiology 189: 339-352, 1993
9. Schnall MD, Imai Y, Tomaszewski J, et al.: Prostate cancer : Local staging with endorectal surface coil MR imaging. Radiology 178: 797-802, 1991
10. Krebs TL and Silverman JM: Clinical utility of endorectal surface coil MR imaging of the prostate gland (abstr). Radiology 185 (P): 275, 1992
11. D'Amico AV, Whittington R, Malkowicz SB, et al. : A multivariable analysis of clinical factors predicting for pathological features associated with local failure after radical prostatectomy for prostate cancer. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys 30: 293-302, 1994
12. Tempany CM, Zhou X, Zerhouni EA, et al. : Staging of prostate cancer : Results of Radiology diagnostic oncology group project comparison of Three imaging techniques. Radiology 192: 47-54, 1994
13. Chelsky MJ, Schnall MD, Seidmon EJ, et al. : Use of endorectal surface coil magnetic resonance imaging for local staging of prostate cancer. J Urol 150: 391-395, 1993
14. Outwater EK, Petersen RO, Siegelman ES, et al. : Prostate carcinoma : Assessment of diagnostic criteria for capsular penetration on endorectal coil MR images. Radiology 193 : 333-339, 1994
15. Hricak H : Editorial on imaging prostate carcinoma. Radiology 169: 569-571, 1988
16. Quint LE, Van Erp JS, Bland PH, et al. : Prostate cancer: correlation of MR images with tissue optical density at pathologic examination. Radiology 179: 837-842, 1991
17. Häggman M, Hellstrom M, Aus G, et al.: Neoadjuvant GnRH-agonist treatment (triptorelin and cyproterone acetate for flare protection) and total prostatectomy. Eur Urol 24: 456-460, 1993
18. Armas OA, Aprikian AG, Melamed J, et al.: Clinical and pathobiological effects of neoadjuvant total androgen ablation therapy on clinical localized prostatic adenocarcinoma. Am J Surg Pathol 18: 979-991, 1994