Is there a simple correction factor for comparing adolescent tobacco-use estimates from school - And home-based surveys?

Nicotine and Tobacco Research

Volumn 6, Issue 3, 2004, Pages 427-437

  Biglan, Michael ^a   Gilpin, Elizabeth A ^a   Rohrbach, Louise A ^b   Pierce, John P ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA   (United States)

^b UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA   (United States)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENCE; ADOLESCENT; AGE DISTRIBUTION; ARTICLE; CIGARETTE SMOKING; CONTROLLED STUDY; FEASIBILITY STUDY; FREQUENCY ANALYSIS; HEALTH BEHAVIOR; HEALTH SURVEY; HIGH SCHOOL; HOME; HUMAN; INTERMETHOD COMPARISON; MONITORING; PREVALENCE; PRIORITY JOURNAL; SCHOOL CHILD; SELF REPORT; SMOKELESS TOBACCO; SOCIAL ASPECT;

ADOLESCENT; ADOLESCENT BEHAVIOR; AGE FACTORS; CHILD; FEMALE; HEALTH SURVEYS; HUMANS; MALE; PREVALENCE; REPRODUCIBILITY OF RESULTS; SCHOOLS; SEX FACTORS; SMOKING; SOCIAL BEHAVIOR; TOBACCO, SMOKELESS; TRUTH DISCLOSURE;

EID: 3242810511     PISSN: 14622203     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1080/14622200410001696592     Document Type: Article

References (50)

1. Aquilino, W. S. (1992). Telephone versus face-to-face interviewing for household drug use surveys. International Journal of Addictions, 27, 71-91.
2. Aquilino, W. S. (1994). Interview mode effects in surveys of drug and alcohol use: A field experiment. Public Opinion Quarterly, 58, 210-240.
3. Bauman, K. E., Koch, G. G., & Bryan, E. S. (1982). Validity of self-reports of adolescent cigarette smoking. International Journal of Addictions, 17, 1131-1136.
4. Bernert, J. T., Turner, W. E., Pirkle, J. L., Sosnoff, C. S., Akins, J. R., Waldrep, M. K., Ann, Q., Covey, T. R., Whitfield, W. E., Gunter, E. W., Miller, B. B., Patterson, D. G., Needham, L. L., Hannon, W. H., & Sampson, E. J. (1997). Development and validation of sensitive methods for determination of serum cotinine in smokers and nonsmokers by liquid chromatography atmospheric pressure ionization tandem mass spectrometry. Clinical Chemistry, 43, 2281-2291.
5. Biener, L., Harris, J. E., & Hamilton, W. (2000). Impact of the Massachusetts tobacco control programme: Population based trend analysis. British Medical Journal, 321, 351-354.
6. Biglan, A., Duncan, T. E., Ary, D. V., & Smolkowski, K. (1995). Peer and parental influences on adolescent tobacco use. Behavioral Medicine, 18, 315-330.
7. Caraballo, R. S., Giovino, G. A., & Pechacek, T. F. (2004). Self-reported cigarette smoking vs. serum cotinine among U.S. adolescents. Nicotine & Tobacco Research, 6, 19-25.
8. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (1998). Tobacco use among high school students - United States, 1997. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 47, 223-233.
9. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. (2001). Youth tobacco surveillance - United States, 2000. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report, 50(SS-4), 1-84.
10. Dent, C. W., Sussman, S. Y., & Stacy, A. W. (1997). The impact of a written parental consent policy on estimates from a school-based drug use survey. Evaluation Review, 21, 698-712.
11. Dolcini, M. M., Adler, N. E., & Ginsberg, D. (1996). Factors influencing agreement between self-reports and biological measures of smoking among adolescents. Journal of Research on Adolescents, 6, 515-542.
12. Glynn, T. J. (1989). Essential elements of school-based smoking prevention programs. Journal of School Health, 59, 181-188.
13. Gfroerer, J. C., & Hughes, A. L. (1991). The feasibility of collecting drug abuse data by telephone. Public Health Reports, 106, 384-393.
14. Haenszel, W., Shimkin, M. B., & Miller, H. P. (1956). Tobacco smoking patterns in the United States. Public Health Monograph No. 45 (PHS Publication No. 463). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare, Public Health Service, Office on Smoking and Health.
15. Horm, J., Cynamon, M., & Thomberry, O. (1995). The influence of parental presence on the reporting of sensitive behaviors by youth. In R. Warnecke (Ed.), Health survey research methods: Conference proceedings (pp. 141-145). Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics.
16. Independent Evaluation Consortium. (1997). Final report of the independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Prevention and Education Program: Wave 1 Data, 1996-1997. Rockville, MD: The Gallup Organization. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/TCSFinal798Gallup.pdf
17. Independent Evaluation Consortium. (1998). Interim report of the independent evaluation of the California Tobacco Control Prevention and Education Program: Wave 2 data, 1998, Wave 1 and Wave 2 data comparisons, 1996-1998. Rockville, MD: The Gallup Organization. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.dhs.ca.gov/tobacco/documents/wave2iereport.pdf
18. Jackson, C., Bee-Gates, D. J., & Henriksen, L. (1994). Authoritative parenting, child competencies, and initiation of cigarette smoking. Health Education Quarterly, 21, 103-116.
19. Johnson, T. P., Hougland, J. G., & Clayton, R. R. (1989). Obtaining reports of sensitive behavior: A comparison of substance use reports from telephone and face-to-face interviews. Social Science Quarterly, 70, 174-183.
20. Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., & O'Malley, P. M. (1993). Monitoring the Future questionnaire responses from the nation's high school seniors (p. 7). Ann Arbor, MI: Institute for Social Research, University of Michigan.
21. Johnston, L. D., O'Malley, P. M., & Bachman, J. G. (2001). Monitoring the Future: National Survey Results on Drug Use, 1975-2000. Volume I: Secondary students (NIH Publication No. 01-4924). Bethesda, MD: National Institute on Drug Abuse.
22. Kann, L., Brener, N. D., Warren, C. W., Collins, J. L., & Giovino, G. A. (2002). An assessment of the effect of data collection setting on the prevalence of health-risk behaviors among adolescents. Journal of Adolescent Health, 31, 327-335.
23. LoSciuto, L., Aquilino, W. S., & Licari, F. C. (1993). Interviewing minority youth about drug use: Telephone vs. in-person surveys. In M. R. De La Rosas & J-L. R. Adrados (Eds.), Drug abuse among minority youth: Methodological issues and recent research advances (pp. 201-223). Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.
24. Luepker, R. V., Pallonen, U. E., Murray, D. M., & Pirie, P. L. (1989). Validity of telephone surveys in assessing cigarette smoking in young adults. American Journal of Public Health, 79, 202-204.
25. McAuliffe, W. E., Geller, S., LaBrie, R. A., Paletz, S. B. F., & Fournier, E. A. (1998). Are telephone surveys suitable for studying substance abuse? Cost, administration, coverage, and response rate issues. Journal of Drug Issues, 28, 455-582.
26. Murray, D. M., & Perry, C. L. (1987). The measurement of substance use among adolescents: When is the 'bogus pipeline' method needed? Addictive Behaviors, 12, 225-233.
27. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (1993). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Dataset documentation for YRBS 1993. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/yrbs/index/
28. National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. (1997). Youth Risk Behavior Surveillance System. Dataset documentation for YRBS 1997. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.cdc.gov/nccdphp/dash/yrbs/index/
29. Noll, R. B., Zeller, M. H., Vannatta, K., Bukowski, W. M., & Davies, W. H. (1997). Potential bias in classroom research: Comparison of children with permission and those who do not receive permission to participate. Journal of Clinical Child Psychology, 26, 36-42.
30. O'Malley, P. M., Johnston, L. D., Bachman, J. G., & Schulenberg, J. (2000). A comparison of confidential versus anonymous survey procedures: Effects on reporting of drug use and related attitudes and beliefs in a national study of students. Journal of Drug Issues, 30, 35-54.
31. O'Reilly, J. M., Hubbard, M. L., Lessler, J. T., Bienner, P. P., & Turner, C. F. (1994). Audio and video computer assisted self-interviewing: Preliminary tests of new technologies for data collection. Journal of Official Statistics, 10, 197-214.
32. Pierce, J. P., Berry, C. C., Gilpin, E. A., Rosbrook, B., & White, M. M. (1998a). Technical report on analytic methods and approaches used in the 1996 California Tobacco Survey Analysis. Volume 1: Data collection methodology. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://ssdc.ucsd.edu/ssdc/pub/cpc00001.html
33. Pierce, J. P., Berry, C. C., Gilpin, E. A., Rosbrook, B., & White, M. M. (1998b). (Technical report on analytic methods and approaches used in the 1996 California Tobacco Survey Analysis. Volume 2: Statistical methodology, public use datafile documentation, individual item responses. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://ssdc.ucsd.edu/ssdc/pub/cpc00001.html
34. Pierce, J. P., Gilpin, E. A., Emery, S. L., Farkas, A. J., Zhu, S. H., Choi, W. S., Berry, C. C., Distefan, J. M., White, M. M., Soroko, S., & Navarro, A. (1998c). Tobacco control in California; Who's winning the war? An evaluation of the tobacco control program. 1989-1996. La Jolla, CA: University of California, San Diego. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://ssdc,ucsd.edu/ssdc/pub/cpc00001.html
35. Pirie, P. L., Murray, D. M., & Luepker, R. V. (1988). Smoking prevalence in a cohort of adolescents, including absentees, dropouts, and transfers. American Journal of Public Health, 78, 176-178.
36. Pojer, R., Whitfield, J. B., Poulos, V., Eckhardt, I. F., Richmond, R. T., & Hensley, W. J. (1984). Carboxyhaemoglobin, cotinine, and thiocyanate compared for distinguishing between smokers and nonsmokers. Clinical Chemistry, 30, 1377-1380.
37. Rohrbach, L. A., Howard-Pitney, B., Unger, J. B., Dent, C. W., Howard, K. A., Cruz, T. B., Ribisl, K. M., Norman, G. J., Fishbein, H., & Johnson, C. A. (2002). Independent evaluation of the California tobacco control program: Relationship between program exposure and outcomes, 1996-1998. American Journal of Public Health, 92, 975-984.
38. Severson, H., & Biglan, A. (1989). Rationale for the use of passive consent in smoking prevention research: Politics, policy and pragmatics. Preventive Medicine, 18, 267-279.
39. Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration. (1997). National Household Survey on Drug Abuse (NHSDA). Data and documentation. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.samhsa.gov/oas/nhsda/1997main/table%20of%20contents.htm
40. Tourangeau, R., & Smith, T. W. (1996). Asking sensitive questions: The impact of data collection mode, question format, and question context. Public Opinion Quarterly, 60, 275-304.
41. Turner, C. F., Ku, L., Rogers, S. M., Lindberg, L. D., Pleck, J. H., & Sonenstein, F. L. (1998). Adolescent sexual behavior, drug use, and violence: Increased reporting with computer survey technology. Science, 280, 867-873.
42. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994a). Preventing tobacco use among young people: A report of the surgeon general. Atlanta, GA: Author, Public Health Service, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, Office on Smoking and Health.
43. U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. (1994b). Teenage Attitudes and Practices Survey II, 1993: [United States] [Computer file]. Hyattsville, MD: Author, National Center for Health Statistics [producer]. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor]. Retrieved January 29, 2004, from http://www.sscnet.ucla.edu/issr/da/index/techinfo/m5821.htm
44. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1970). Changes in cigarette smoking habits between 1955 and 1966 (PHS Publication No. 1000, Series 10, No. 59). Rockville, MD: Author, Public Health Service, Mental Health Administration.
45. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1972). Teenage smoking: National patterns of cigarette smoking, ages 12 through 18, in 1968 and 1970 (DHEW Publication No. HSM 72-7508). Rockville, MD: Author, Health Services and Mental Health Administration, National Clearinghouse for Smoking and Health.
46. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1976). Teenage smoking: National patterns of cigarette smoking, ages 12 through 18, in 1972 and 1974 (DHEW Publication No. NIH 76-931. Rockville, MD: Author, Public Health Service, National Institutes of Health.
47. U.S. Department of Health, Education, and Welfare. (1979). Teenage smoking: Immediate and long-term patterns. Rockville, MD: Author, National Institute of Education.
48. Wills, T. A., & Cleary, S. D. (1997). The validity of self-reports of smoking: Analysis in a school sample of urban adolescents. American Journal of Public Health, 87, 56-61.
49. Wright, D. L., Aquilino, W. S., & Supple, A. J. (1998). A comparison of computer-assisted and paper-and-pencil self-administered questionnaires in a survey on smoking, alcohol, and drug use. Public Opinion Quarterly, 62, 331-353.
50. Zanes, A., & Matsoukas, E. (1979). Different settings, different results? A comparison of school and home responses. Public Opinion Quarterly, 43, 550-557.