Repeat urethrotomy and dilation for the treatment of urethral stricture are neither clinically effective nor cost-effective.

The Journal of urology

Volumn 172, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 275-277

  Greenwell, T J ^a   Castle, C ^a   Andrich, D E ^a   MacDonald, J T ^a   Nicol, D L ^a   Mundy, A R ^a  

^a Charles Bell House   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; ARTICLE; CLASSIFICATION; COST BENEFIT ANALYSIS; COST OF ILLNESS; ECONOMICS; GENERAL AND MISCELLANEOUS PROCEDURES AND TECHNIQUES; HEALTH CARE COST; HUMAN; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; PATHOLOGY; RECURRENT DISEASE; STATISTICS; TREATMENT OUTCOME; UNITED KINGDOM; URETHRA; URETHRA STRICTURE; UROLOGIC SURGERY;

ADOLESCENT; ADULT; AGED; COST OF ILLNESS; COST-BENEFIT ANALYSIS; DILATATION; GREAT BRITAIN; HEALTH CARE COSTS; HUMANS; MALE; MIDDLE AGED; RECURRENCE; TREATMENT OUTCOME; URETHRA; URETHRAL STRICTURE; UROLOGIC SURGICAL PROCEDURES;

EID: 3242801369     PISSN: 00225347     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1097/01.ju.0000132156.76403.8f     Document Type: Article

References (0)