Randomized studies in intrauterine insemination

Fertility and Sterility

Volumn 82, Issue 1, 2004, Pages 27-29

  Cooke, Ian D ^a  

^a UNIVERSITY OF SHEFFIELD   (United Kingdom)

Author keywords

[No Author keywords available]

Indexed keywords

ARTICLE; CLINICAL TRIAL; COST; EMBRYO TRANSFER; ENDOMETRIOSIS; FEMALE INFERTILITY; FERTILIZATION IN VITRO; HEALTH CARE SYSTEM; HUMAN; INTRACYTOPLASMIC SPERM INJECTION; INTRAUTERINE INSEMINATION; MALE INFERTILITY; OVARY FOLLICLE DEVELOPMENT; OVULATION INDUCTION; PRIORITY JOURNAL; RANDOMIZATION; SPERM; WORLD HEALTH ORGANIZATION;

FEMALE; HUMANS; INSEMINATION, ARTIFICIAL; META-ANALYSIS; PREGNANCY; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED TRIALS;

EID: 3242801353     PISSN: 00150282     EISSN: None     Source Type: Journal    
DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2004.02.102     Document Type: Article

References (16)

1. Claman P., Wilkie V., Collins D. Timing intrauterine insemination either 33 or 39 hours after administration of human chorionic gonadotropin yields the same pregnancy rates after superovulation therapy. Fertil Steril. 82:2004;13-16
2. Osuna C., Matorras R., Pijoan J.I., Rodriguez-Escudero F.J. One versus two inseminations per cycle in intrauterine insemination with sperm from patients' husbands a systematic review of the literature. Fertil Steril. 82:2004;17-24
3. National Institute for Clinical Excellence. Fertility - full guideline, second consultation. Available at: http://www.nice.org.uk/Docref.asp?d=83937. Accessed April 25, 2004
4. Department of Health. Reforming NHS financial flows: introducing payment by results. 3.7 Why introduce a standard price tariff? Available at: http://www.doh.gov.uk/nhsfinancialreforms/financialflowsoct02.htm
5. Baird D.T., Crosignani P.G., Evers J.L.H., Fanchin R., Fauser B.C., Filicori M., et al. Mono-ovulatory cycles a key goal in profertility programmes. Hum Reprod Update. 9:2003;263-274
6. Gerris J., De Neubourg D., Mangelschots K., Van Royen E., Vercruyssen M., Barudy-Vasquez J., et al. Elective single day 3 embryo transfer halves the twinning rate without decrease in the ongoing pregnancy rate of an IVF/ICSI programme. Hum Reprod. 17:2002;2626-2631
7. Martikainen H., Tiitinen A., Tomas C., Tapanainen J., Orava M., Tuomivaara L., et al. One versus two embryo transfer after IVF and ICSI a randomized study. Hum Reprod. 16:2001;1900-1903
8. Hamberger L., Hazekamp J. Towards single embryo transfer in IVF. J Reprod Immunol. 55:2002;141-148
9. Hazecamp J., Bergh C., Wennerholm U.-B., Hovatta O., Karlstrom P.O., Selbing A. Avoiding multiple pregnancies in ART consideration of new strategies. Hum Reprod. 15:2000;1217-1219
10. Fauser C.J.M., Devroey P., Yen S.S.C., Gosden R., Crowley W.F., Baird D.T., et al. Minimal ovarian stimulation for IVF appraisal of potential benefits and drawbacks. Hum Reprod. 14:1999;2681-2686
11. Sackett D.L., Richardson W.S., Rosenberg W., Haynes R.B. Evidence-based medicine: how to practice and teach EBM. 1997;95 Churchill Livingstone, London
12. Jefferson T., Demicheli V., Mugford M. Elementary economic evaluation in health care. 1996;BMJ Publishing Group, London
13. Armitage P., Berry G. Statistical methods in medical research. 3rd ed:1994;215-219 Blackwell, London
14. Collins J., Graves G. The economic consequences of multiple gestation in assisted conception cycles. Hum Fertil. 3:2000;275-283
15. Mann T. Clinical guidelines: using clinical guidelines to improve patient care within the NHS. Leeds: Health Care Directorate, NHS Executive, 1996
16. Pocock S.J. Clinical trials, a practical approach. 1983;John Wiley & Sons, Chichester, United Kingdom